인간과 기계번역의 공존을 위한 담론:행위자 네트워크 이론을 중심으로
Discourse for the Coexistence of Human and Machine Translation. Focusing on ANT
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this research is to look at the relationship between human and machine translation based on the actor-network theory and how it can be applied in the futhure. As part of the verification, we examine newspaper articles related to transgender. The first stage can be seen of pre-NMT stage, which took place from 2009 to 2015. The second stage can be described as the stage after the emergence of the NMT, which took place from 2016 to 2019. The last stage, which took place from 2020 to 2021, emphasized the role of human and machine translation by investigating post-editing beyond the simple comparison of human and machine translation. Park(2020) suggested that machines can also be regarded as actors according to the actor-network theory. This is because it is possible to verify and analyze how both humans and machines translate. Therefore, not only human post-editing work is required, but if the machine does not recognize these socially sensitive words and translate them in large quantities, it may cause social problems and main actor may be overturned. In this regard, it is a stage to consider what prerequisites must be met in translation to lead the machine to the good direction desired by humans.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to look at the relationship between human and machine translation based on the actor-network theory and how it can be applied in the futhure. As part of the verification, we examine newspaper articles related to transgender. The first stage can be seen of pre-NMT stage, which took place from 2009 to 2015. The second stage can be described as the stage after the emergence of the NMT, which took place from 2016 to 2019. The last stage, which took place from 2020 to 2021, emphasized the role of human and machine translation by investigating post-editing beyond the simple comparison of human and machine translation. Park(2020) suggested that machines can also be regarded as actors according to the actor-network theory. This is because it is possible to verify and analyze how both humans and machines translate. Therefore, not only human post-editing work is required, but if the machine does not recognize these socially sensitive words and translate them in large quantities, it may cause social problems and main actor may be overturned. In this regard, it is a stage to consider what prerequisites must be met in translation to lead the machine to the good direction desired by humans.
참고문헌 (11)
- 김동미, "중재자로서의 번역가 역할에 대한 재고: 트랜스젠더 신문 기사를 중심으로", 인문사회 21, 12(6), pp.93~108 (2021), 인문사회 21
- 김동미, "영한 신문 기사의 ‘트랜스젠더’ 지칭어 번역 양상 연구", 인문사회 21, 13(2), pp.2385~2400 (2022), 인문사회 21
- 김환석, "STS 사회학의 혁신", 과학기술연구, 1(1), pp.201~234 (2001)
- 박옥수, "한영 기계 번역에서 ST의 유형적 특징에 따른 번역 오류 분석", 동아인문학, (41), pp.155~183 (2017), 동아인문학회
- 박은주, "기계도 행위할 수 있는가? : 브루노 라투르의 행위자네트워크 이론(actor-network theory)을 중심으로", 교육철학연구, 42(4), pp.1~26 (2020), 한국교육철학학회
- 최문선, "국내 번역학 기계번역 연구 동향:내용 분석과 키워드 분석을 중심으로", 언어학연구, 24(1), pp.275~297 (2019), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]
- 최수연, "영상번역의 사회학적 연구 : 행위자 네트워크 이론을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2016
- 홍성욱, "인간ㆍ사물ㆍ동맹; 행위자네트워크 이론과 테크노 사이언스" (2010), 이름
- Callon, Michel, "Technology and the Wealth of Nations: Dynamics of Constructed Advantage", pp.232~268 (1993), Printer
- Latour, Bruno, "A Note on Socio-Technological Graphs", Social Studies of Science, 22, pp.33~57 (1992)
- Latour, Bruno, "Reasembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory" (2005), Oxford UP