한일·일한 소설 번역의 인식 양태 고찰 <우리들의 행복한 시간>, <流しの下の骨>를 중심으로
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Thoughts over how to deliver overall meanings properly in translation have been made a lot as it is witnessed in such issues as cultureme translation, idiom translation, and equivalence matter, etc. Translators in reality, however, face problems that are frequently related to detailed grammar. The translators struggle to make the best decision at the micro level, such as selecting specific kinds of postpositional words and how to translate passive forms, which requires the translators to be equipped with grammatical knowledge of each language. Modality translation is a case in point. Japanese and Korean languages are similar in terms of syntactic structures and the modality that expresses the psychological status of speakers/writers is realized at the end of sentences. Yet, the modal expressions are not literally translated in real translation. Similar kinds of modal expressions exist in each language and they have been analyzed and categorized in a diverse manner. The outcomes of the analysis and categorization need to be applied to real translation. To this end, this paper analyzes literary works (novels) that have various kinds of modal expressions. The categories of modal expressions, epistemic modality in particular, are made to compare and contrast Korean and Japanese translations. The epistemic modal expressions are extracted from TT, and the meanings of each expression are analyzed under the category of literal translation,translation that uses different forms of modality, and translation that doesn't use modal expressions. The values of modality in Korean and Japanese languages are also examined with reference to the categorizing and value setting done by Halliday (2004) who applied systemic functional grammar, which ultimately makes it possible in this paper to look into the modality value difference between ST and TT.
Abstract
Thoughts over how to deliver overall meanings properly in translation have been made a lot as it is witnessed in such issues as cultureme translation, idiom translation, and equivalence matter, etc. Translators in reality, however, face problems that are frequently related to detailed grammar. The translators struggle to make the best decision at the micro level, such as selecting specific kinds of postpositional words and how to translate passive forms, which requires the translators to be equipped with grammatical knowledge of each language. Modality translation is a case in point. Japanese and Korean languages are similar in terms of syntactic structures and the modality that expresses the psychological status of speakers/writers is realized at the end of sentences. Yet, the modal expressions are not literally translated in real translation. Similar kinds of modal expressions exist in each language and they have been analyzed and categorized in a diverse manner. The outcomes of the analysis and categorization need to be applied to real translation. To this end, this paper analyzes literary works (novels) that have various kinds of modal expressions. The categories of modal expressions, epistemic modality in particular, are made to compare and contrast Korean and Japanese translations. The epistemic modal expressions are extracted from TT, and the meanings of each expression are analyzed under the category of literal translation,translation that uses different forms of modality, and translation that doesn't use modal expressions. The values of modality in Korean and Japanese languages are also examined with reference to the categorizing and value setting done by Halliday (2004) who applied systemic functional grammar, which ultimately makes it possible in this paper to look into the modality value difference between ST and TT.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강소영, "양태 표지 ‘-ㄹ 터이-’의 의미", 한국어 의미학, 9, pp.179~119 (2001)
- 의 양태표지 연구, "한국어학", 2002, 1~236, pp.한국어학회
- 강현주, "추측과 의지의 양태 표현 '-겠'과 '-(으)ㄹ 것이다'의 교육 방안 연구", 이중언어학, (43), pp.29~53 (2010), 이중언어학회
- 金東郁, "단독형식화 모달리티의 유무를 통해서 살펴 본 한・일 문말구조의 차이점", 일어일문학연구, 26, pp.149~177 (1995)
- 김지은, "우리말 양태용언 구문 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- 박선옥, "言語類型論の観点から見た日本語のモダリティ", 일본문화연구, (28), pp.47~70 (2008), 동아시아일본학회
- 박재연, "한국어와 영어의 양태 표현에 대한 대조적 고찰: 부정과 관련한 문법 현상을 중심으로", 이중언어학, (22), pp.201~224 (2003), 이중언어학회
- 박재연, "연결어미와 양태 : 이유, 조건, 양보의 연결어미를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.119~141 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 안정아, "‘것’, ‘터’, ‘모양’의 양태 의미 연구", 어문논집, 47, pp.4~128 (2003), 민족어문학회
- 안주호, "-는 법이다'류의 양태표현 연구", 國語學, (44), pp.185~210 (2004), 국어학회
- 엄녀, "한국어 양태표현 교육연구" (2007), 한국문화사
- 이기갑, "한국어의 양태(modality) 표현-언어 유형론의 관점에서", 담화인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집 (2006)
- 이윤진, "한국어교육에서의 양태 표현 연구", 한국어교육, 14(1), pp.8~210 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이주리애, "한일 번역의 양태 표현(modality) 연구 — 신문 사설의 코퍼스 분석을 통하여 —", 번역학연구, 13(5), pp.175~196 (2012), 한국번역학회
- 이필영, "서술부 양태 표현의 부정 양상 -보조용언적 구성을 중심으로", 國語學, (48), pp.175~201 (2006), 국어학회
- 이혜용, "［짐작］·［추측］양태 표현의 의미와 화용적 기능", 대학원연구논집, (2005), pp.77~118 (2005)
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 장경희, "현대국어의 양태범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 沢田治美, "モダリティ" (2006), 開拓社
- 沢田治美, "ひつじ意味論講座-モダリティⅡ : 事例研究" (2012), ひつじ書房
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称" (1991), ひつじ書房
- 仁田義雄, "仁田義雄日本語文法著作選2 日本語のモダリティとその周辺" (2009), ひつじ書房
- 仁田義雄, "日本語類議表現の文法(上)" (1995), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "モダリティの文法" (1991), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "基礎日本語文法" (1992), くろしお出版
- 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書4 モダリティ" (2002), くろしお出版
- Baker, M., "In other words" (1992), Routledge
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction To Functional Grammar" (2004), Hodder Arnold
- Kranich, S., "Epistemic Modality in English Popular Scientific Texts and Their German Translations", trans-kom, 2(1), pp.26~41 (2009)
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 공지영, "우리들의 행복한 시간" (2005), 푸른숲
- 孔枝泳, "私たちの幸せな時間" (2007), 新潮社
- 江國香織, "流しの下の骨" (2010), 新潮文庫
- 에쿠니 가오리, "소란한 보통날" (2011), 소담출판사
- 夏目漱石, "こころ" (1995), 集英社
- 박유하, "마음" (2002), 웅진닷컴
- 나쓰메 소세키, "마음" (2008), 도서출판 이레