일한·한일 소설 번역의 행위요구 모달리티 분석 -의뢰·권유·허가·희망 표현을 중심으로-
Deontic Modality Analysis On Japanese-Korean And Korean-Japanese Novel Translations - Focused On Requesting, Suggesting, Wishing And Conceding Expressions -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
行為要求モダリティとは話し手が行為の実行を聞き手に求める表現のモダリティである。認識モダリティの場合は日本語のほうが韓国語に比べて婉曲な表現を使う傾向があることが議論されている。本論文では行為要求モダリティにおける日本語と韓国語の使用の違いを分析することを目的とする。行為要求モダリティのうち、聞き手に判断の余地を与えない命令と禁止の表現を除いた依頼·勧め·許可·希望の表現は聞き手の受け止める印象に差がある。本研究では非翻訳小説と翻訳小説に表れる行為要求モダリティの出現の頻度を調べた結果、日本語の非翻訳小説のほうが韓日翻訳小説に比べ間接的な表現が使われる割合が高く、日韓翻訳小説でも日本語の間接的行為要求表現が韓国語の翻訳で直接的表現として表れる傾向にあることが分かった。日本語は韓国語に比べ依頼疑問型や希望のモダリティが多く使われているため、韓日翻訳の際には韓国語式の直接的行為要求よりは「~てくれる?·~てもらえる?」などの疑問型の依頼表現や「てほしい·てもらいたい」などの希望のモダリティで翻訳する割合を高めることでさらに日本語のテキストに近い自然な日本語の文章が可能になると思われる。
Abstract
Requesting, suggesting, wishing and conceding are some of the most typicalforms of expression that relate to deontic modality. With the exception ofcommanding or prohibiting expressions, where the listener is not allowed any choice,these forms of expression vary in their degree of forcibleness and freedom of choiceupon the listener. Regarding epistemic modality, it has been argued that the Japaneselanguage tends to have a higher inclination towards the use of euphemistic phrasesor expressions than the Korean language. And that being said regarding epistemicmodality, this study aimed to observe the difference between Korean and Japanesein terms of deontic modality through a comparative analysis between translatednovels and untranslated, original novels. Results showed that original, untranslatedJapanese novels had a higher usage rate of roundabout phrases and expressionscompared to Korean novels that were translated into Japanese. It was also observedthat roundabout deontic expressions in Japanese novels were converted into directdeontic expressions when translated into Korean. Interrogative request and wishingexpressions are frequently used in the Japanese language.
참고문헌 (12)
- 김미정, "행위요구표현의 담화 및 학습서 분석-한·일 명령, 의뢰표현을 중심으로-", 일본어교육연구, (27), pp.13~29 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
- 유혜정, "韓？語と日本語の依?表現の比較 -依?表現の使い分けを中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 53(1), pp.269~288 (2005), 한국일어일문학회
- 윤상실, "日？韓 양 언어의 추량표현 대조연구(續) －어용론적 관점에서－", 일본연구, (24), pp.371~392 (2005), 일본연구소
- 이주리애, "한일 번역의 양태 표현(modality) 연구 — 신문 사설의 코퍼스 분석을 통하여 —", 번역학연구, 13(5), pp.175~196 (2012), 한국번역학회
- 이주리애, "일한·한일 소설 번역의 양태 표현 고찰 : 인식 양태와 평가 양태를 중심으로", 박사, 통번역학전공, pp.2014
- 정하준, "일본어 행동요구표현의 번역례 연구", 日本語文學, 1(37), pp.175~196 (2008), 한국일본어문학회
- 折田真一, "行動要求表現選択の日韓対照研究-アンケート調査結果を根拠として-", 일본언어문화, 2, pp.105~123 (2003)
- 高梨信乃, "評価のモダリティ-現代日本語における記述的研究-", pp.191~205 (2010), くろしお出版
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4. 第8部モダリティ", pp.66~81 (2003), くろしお出版
- 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書 4 モダリティ", pp.44~ (2002), くろしお出版
- 한미경, "한일영상매체의 담화의 행위요구표현양상", 일본언어문화, (21), pp.211~233 (2012), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction To Functional Grammar", pp.623~ (2004), Hodder Arnold