본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일한·한일 소설 번역의 평가 모달리티 분석-「なくてはいけない」「べき」「-야 되/하」를 중심으로-

Deontic Modality in Japanese-Korean and Korean-Japanaese Novel Translation -Focused on 「nakutewaikenai」「beki」「ya handa」-

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The Diontic modality in this study, “nakutewaikenai” “beki” “ya handa” for the translation of the novel translate materials analyzed. Evaluation of modaliy expressed a high degree of compulsion which is classified as “nakutewaikenai” and “ya handa” is simply a speaker and a listener for a high degree of force does not mean only obligation. In particular, the Korean “ya handa” implies the use of a high percentage of Japanese in the area of ​​semantic “nakutewaikenai” wider than the side. Thus, when translated work “nakutewaikenai” translations “ya handa” for the phenomenon is mainly translation is not a big issue, but “nakutewaikenai” most “ya handa” as a translation for the expression of a little more translation is needed to see the advantage of diversity. In this study, the Japanese non-translated text, appearing in the Japanese novel “nakutewaikenai” appeared than in the translate novel “nakutewaikenai” and suggested various expressions by replacing the various translation alternatives. Translation is not only a character-by-character conversion but a means-by-means conversion. The same is true for translation of modality. Target language (Target Language) readers should be familiar with the forms of expression. Non-translation text corpus analysis to compare with the translation text translation-oriented readers should be easy to read.

Abstract

The Diontic modality in this study, “nakutewaikenai” “beki” “ya handa” for the translation of the novel translate materials analyzed. Evaluation of modaliy expressed a high degree of compulsion which is classified as “nakutewaikenai” and “ya handa” is simply a speaker and a listener for a high degree of force does not mean only obligation. In particular, the Korean “ya handa” implies the use of a high percentage of Japanese in the area of ​​semantic “nakutewaikenai” wider than the side. Thus, when translated work “nakutewaikenai” translations “ya handa” for the phenomenon is mainly translation is not a big issue, but “nakutewaikenai” most “ya handa” as a translation for the expression of a little more translation is needed to see the advantage of diversity. In this study, the Japanese non-translated text, appearing in the Japanese novel “nakutewaikenai” appeared than in the translate novel “nakutewaikenai” and suggested various expressions by replacing the various translation alternatives. Translation is not only a character-by-character conversion but a means-by-means conversion. The same is true for translation of modality. Target language (Target Language) readers should be familiar with the forms of expression. Non-translation text corpus analysis to compare with the translation text translation-oriented readers should be easy to read.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 고영근, "우리말 문법론", pp.193~194 (2010), 집문당
  2. 김양선, "현대일본어의 인식적 모댈리티 형식과 의무적 모댈리티 형식에 관한 연구 -まい,かもしれない,はずだ,にちがいない와 べきだ,なければならない를 중심으로-", 일어일문학연구, 49(2), pp.187~215 (2004), 한국일어일문학회
  3. 김양선, "텍스트에서의 ‘べきだ’의 의미", 일어일문학연구, 56(1), pp.83~106 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
  4. 민경모, "서법(Mood) 구현 형식에 대한 일고찰 -서법 범주의 수용과 전개를 중심으로-", 한국학논집, (40), pp.417~452 (2010), 한국학연구원
  5. 박진남, "논설문 지도의 방향", 한국초등국어교육, 8, pp.107~119 (1992)
  6. 서유경, "양태(Modality)의 번역: 노한 번역에서의 양태 번역 유형을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 11(1), pp.53~78 (2007), 통번역연구소
  7. 안주호, "‘-어야 하-’류 구성의 문법적 특성과 의미", 국어교육, (118), pp.363~394 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  8. 이주리애, "한일 번역의 양태 표현(modality) 연구 — 신문 사설의 코퍼스 분석을 통하여 —", 번역학연구, 13(5), pp.175~196 (2012), 한국번역학회
  9. 이주리애, "한일·일한 소설 번역의 인식 양태 고찰 <우리들의 행복한 시간>, <流しの下の骨>를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 17(3), pp.315~339 (2013), 통번역연구소
  10. 이주리애, "일한·한일 소설 번역의 양태 표현 고찰 : 인식 양태와 평가 양태를 중심으로", 박사, 통번역학전공, pp.2014
  11. 장원재, "한국 일본어 연구의 코퍼스 활용 현황", 일본어문학, (41), pp.205~220 (2008), 일본어문학회
  12. 권성, "「だろう」「かもしれない」「はず」に関する研究-「겠(지)(-gess(ji))」「ㄹ것(-lgeos)」「지도모르다(-ji(do) moleuda)」との比較 -", 日本文化學報, (57), pp.5~30 (2013), 한국일본문화학회
  13. 澤田治美, "モダリティ", pp.302~324 (2006), 開拓社
  14. 澤田治美, "ひつじ意味論講座-モダリティⅡ:事例研究", pp.83~99 (2012), ひつじ書房
  15. 高梨信乃, "評価のモダリティ-現代日本語における記述的研究-", pp.81~100 (2010), くろしお出版
  16. 仁田義雄, "仁田義雄日本語文法著作選 2 日本語のモダリティとその周辺", pp.3~14 (2009), ひつじ書房
  17. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4. 第8部モダリティ", pp.91~131 (2003), くろしお出版
  18. 益岡隆志, "モダリティの文法", pp.53~54 (1991), くろしお出版
  19. 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書 4 モダリティ", pp.80~120 (2002), くろしお出版
  20. Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction To Functional Grammar(3rd ed. Revised)", pp.613~625 (2004), Hodder Arnold

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)