미얀마 군부, ‘시대’를 착각하고 ‘세대’를 오해했다
Myanmar's powerful military got it wrong times, and wrong generation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 글은 올해(2021) 2월부터 군부 쿠데타에 맞서 싸워 온 미얀마의 민주화 운동의 현재적 과제를 살펴보면서, 특히 중요한 목소리를 내고 있는 'Z세대', '여성', '소수민족 커뮤니티'에 주목한다. 이를 통해 이번 미얀마의 민주화 운동이 군부가 '과도정부'와 '선거'를 카드로 내건 '형식적 제도 차원의 민주주의'나 '1988년 이후 오히려 강화된 폐쇄적 종교나 인종주의에 갇혀 한계가 뚜렷했던 지난 10년의 과도기 민주주의'와 차별화되는 지점을 보여준다. 이러한 관점은 군부가 '과도정부'를 선언하며 지하임시정부인 '국민통합정부'와 유엔에서 정통성 싸움을 벌일 예정인 현재, 그 의미가 더욱 부각될 필요가 있다. 특히 최근 미얀마 운동의 목표가 반쿠데타에 머물지 않고 반군부로 발전하면서, 근본적으로 기존 체제에 대한 비판과 새로운 정치체로의 전환을 꽤하고 있음은 주목을 요한다. 그러한 변화의 예로 'Z세대'의 등장은 핵심적이다. 2월 6일의 역사적 시위를 주도하기도 한 이들은 미얀마의 소수민족인 로힝야 학살을 비판하면서 현재의 민주화운동의 성격을 변화시키고 있다. 또한 'Z세대'라는 말은 특정 연령이나 인종을 지칭하지 않으며 인종주의와 성차별주의 및 권위주의를 비판하는 정신을 지닌 다양한 정체성으로 구성되어 있다. 특히 봉제공장 노동자, 소수인종인 카렌족 여성들과 같은 여성들의 활약이 두드러진다. 이러한 새로운 민주화의 흐름은 쇼셜 미디어를 통해 전개된 "#Black4Rohingya' 캠페인, 로힝야 제노사이드 4주년을 추모하는 전지구적 차원에 다양한 모임, 내전 지역 카렌주의 카렌여성기구(Karen Women's Organization, KWO)의 성명 등을 들 수 있다. 특히, 소수민족여성들은 오래 전부터 내전 하 전시성폭력에 대한 활동을 전개하면서, 아웅산수치와 주류 미얀마 사회가 로힝야 학살을 함구했던 시기부터, 최초로 정부군의 로힝야 학살을 공개비판한 단체이기도 하다. 그들은 수십년 동안 소수민족 여성들이 내전 하에서 경험한 전시성폭력에 대해 문제제기를 해왔고 이러한 문제의식 속에서 로힝야 (여성)에 대한 공감과 연대를 표시하고 있는 것이다. 청년 세대의 로힝야 제노사이드에 대한 뼈저린 각성, 주류이념이었던 불교 민족주의의 약화, 저명한 로힝야 활동가들의 포용력있는 행보 속에서 미얀마 민주화운동은 민중사를 새롭게 쓰는 과정 속에 있다. 이처럼 여성, 노동자, 소수민족, 청년 세대가 출발선에 섰던 미얀마의 봄의 혁명은, 각 행위체들 사이의 교차적 연결을 발견하면서, 그 어떤 소수자도 배반하지 않는 진정한 민주주의를 건설하기 위해 분투하고 있다.
Abstract
The work I present in this issue of the 『THE DONG BANG HAK CHI(동방학지)』 is to look into a critical development of Myanmar's struggle against the country' powerful military, that has staged yet another coup in the wee hours of the morning on Feb.1 this year. To begin with, I highlighted who did breaking the first bold move igniting a mass protest. Because, from then on, a 'protest' has been quickly turned as a nationwide 'uprising' - now in a 'revolutionary' form after more than seven months. It should be noted that people who braved the initiative bear some eye-catching characters. Those are : 'Generation G', 'Women' and 'Ethnic minorities'. The characters imply an important set of messages. The unfolding situation in Myanmar - called "Spring Revolution" - isn't just about reclaiming electoral process and the result to be respected. The message is more about upsetting regressive social and political orders to make truly democratic change happen. Such change would relinquish the existing 'democratic' system, under which racism and 'religious extremism' (read 'Buddhist nationalism' in Myanmar context) have been embraced by elements of mainstream democratic forces, notably the 88 uprising generation as well as National League for Democracy led by Aung San Suu Kyi. The charaters became even more significant particularly when the military council or SAC, which rebranded themselves "caretaker government" on August 1, and the democratically-mandated National Unity Government (or NUG), which generally tagged with "shadow government", are now involved in a die-hard competition to gain legitimacy - first stage has just begun at the UN General Assembly starting from September 14. One may revisit slogans chanted at the early stage of the protests. They were based on 'against the coup', thus "stop the coup" (or "reverse the coup") or 'respect the result of the 2020's election', otherwise "free our leaders". However, as time went by, "anti-coup" isn't enough to elaborate developing story. What has become clearer is that people fight against not just Feb.1 coup event. They are fighting against the decades-old oppressive 'military establishement' as a whole. That is to say people in Myanmar, at least significant part out of whole constituencies, are actively pursuing New Myanmar without Tatmadaw, local name for the military. Further, their bloody 'revolution', as they hope, would bring about fundamental change toward truly democratic society getting the old guard demised. One of the outstanding examples of that change is an emergence of 'Generation Z' (or "Gen Z"). For example, the two female activists who led a historical protest on Feb. 6, along with some five thousands participated in a protest against the military coup, can be catagorized into 'Gen Z'. Since the Feb.6, mass movement has become a daily scene for some time, then evolved into a nation-wide uprising. The 'Gen Zs' are also the ones who raised their voice on the issue of Rohingya Genocide, while almost everyone else in democratic circles keep silent. This had made the country's democracy movement very dark and grim. The words "Gen Z" would command symbolic lines, withno necessity of sticking to one's physical age. The words do not reveal any particular race or ethnic, or sexual orientation. The vagueness could be rather inclusive in principle. It is effectively denouncing racism, sexism or any kind of sectarianism as well as authoritarianism. Among 'Gen Zs' at protest sites were young female garment factory workers. Also ethnic Karen women can be 'Gen Z'. They all are just 'Gen Z'. Race, sex or sect are not required to be revealed. This new trend of evolution - while holding independece from the old 'democratic' guard- has been witnessed in a couple of recent events. One was a global campaign called "#Black4Rohingya" last June, for example. The trend also found in various events on the occasion of the 4th anniversary of Rohingya Genocide, as well as Karen Women's Organization's statement expressing solidarity with Rohingya women. It should be acknowleged that it was KWO who first came out to publicly issue a statement with their vocal criticism on Rohingya Genocide. Whilst, Aung San Suu Kyi and other mainstream arena in Myanmar kept silent on the Genocide, - if not cheering up the military act. They are the very people who have gone through rape and other form of sexual violences committed by Burmese military in their war-ravaged ethnic homeland. Ethnic women have every reason to express solidarity with Rohingya women by sharing their suffering as well. Youths in Myanmar have displayed their heart-felt regret and remorse for their silent past on Rohingya Genocide. They also tend to maintain afar from a country's dominant ideology, i.e. 'Buddist Nationalism', which played a pivotal role in successive anti-Muslims and anti-Rohingya hate campaign for the past decade. Despite all these enmities they have got from a society, some prominent Rohingya activists have shown remarkable tolerance and efforts in their coordination for a fight against the military since the coup. These are just a few but significant. Myanmar people are in progress of writing their new history as they revolutionize democratic uprising. In that regard, 'Spring Revolution' would realign women, workers, ethnic minorities and 'Gen. Z' youths crisscrossed or inter-sectionalized. All these actors have collectively stood up for the country's longing democracy, which won't do othering any minority but build a truly democratic new society.
참고문헌 (28)
- "미얀마 쿠테타 (저항의) 중심에는 Z 세대가 있다" (2021), 이유경[URL]
- "저무는 아이콘 아웅산 수치" (2014), 이유경[URL]
- "All You Can Do is Pray Crimes Against Humanity and Ethnic Cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma’s Arakan State" (2013)[URL]
- "The Rohingya and the White Cards Saga" (2019)[URL]
- "Rohingya Activists are hoping that the Coup in Myanmar will be a turning point for their struggle" (2021)[URL]
- "Return to arms?, Boots in Suits" (2007)[URL]
- Emily Fishbein, "‘Genocide is un-Burmese' : Breaking taboos, activists speak up for Rohingya", The Christian Science Monitor, ~ (2020)
- "I am passionate about"[URL]
- "Final Myanmar results show Aung San Suu Kyi’s Pary won 77% of seats" (2015)[URL]
- Htet Aung, "Burma’s Rigged Road Map to Democracy", The Irrawaddy, 15(8) (2007)
- "Burmese Ceasefire Groups to Attend National Convention" (2005)[URL]
- "Suu Kyi's NLD party to boycott Burma election" (2010)[URL]
- "2000 Myanmar Junta soldiers and police join civil disobedience movement", The Irrawaddy, ~ (2021)
- "Briefing Paper: Myanmar’s representation in the United Nations" (2021)[URL]
- "Forced Migration of Rohingya : The Untold Experience" (2018)[URL]
- "How Generation Z galbanized a revolutinary movement against Myanmar’s 2021 Military Coup" (2021)[URL]
- Shan Women’s Action Network, "License to Rape", ~ (2002)
- "띤자 슌레이 활동가 인터뷰", 보이스 메신저, ~ (2021)
- "사이 삼 캄 활동가 인터뷰", 페이스북 메신저, ~ (2021)
- "‘Protect The Rohingya(PTR)’ 인터뷰", 트위터 메신저, ~ (2021)
- "Ro Nay San Lwin 인터뷰", 이메일, ~ (2021)
- "People’s Embrace 페이스북 페이지"[URL]
- "미얀마 45개 시민사회단체 공동성명", ~
- "미얀마 헌법 전문" (2008)[URL]
