본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주요한의 삶과 시의 대응양식

The life of Ju Yo-han and poetic response

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In this thesis the writer considered on the life of a poet and the poetic responce as the result. He focused on Ju Yo-han, because he was a leader in the history of Korean modern poetry. When we say that Lyric is the most private genre, a record of momentary emotion, we can not expect an epic connection in the poems. But if the individual works are responses of the outlook on the world of one poet, there will be a durability which passes through his whole life. The poems of Ju Yo-han are very various, so they seems separately each other. But his every works were possible on the Idealism. He lived dualistic life, one is a pure literary living, another is a vulgar living. His poetic possibility was on the Idealism far from actual reality. At the latter period, he emphasized the popular art, but the concept stayed on the Folk. So there was not the colonial realism. He produced 'Chae-suk-jang' - which responsed the actual reality - but such attempt could not continued. Because there was too big difference between the idel life and the real life which he recognized. After all we can conclude that his literary works were possible on the ground of abstract Idealism. We could see the dual life of a colonial intellectual and the literary response in the life of Ju Yo-han, but on the other hand it is not individual problem, it is a misery of the history of Korean modern literature.

Abstract

In this thesis the writer considered on the life of a poet and the poetic responce as the result. He focused on Ju Yo-han, because he was a leader in the history of Korean modern poetry. When we say that Lyric is the most private genre, a record of momentary emotion, we can not expect an epic connection in the poems. But if the individual works are responses of the outlook on the world of one poet, there will be a durability which passes through his whole life. The poems of Ju Yo-han are very various, so they seems separately each other. But his every works were possible on the Idealism. He lived dualistic life, one is a pure literary living, another is a vulgar living. His poetic possibility was on the Idealism far from actual reality. At the latter period, he emphasized the popular art, but the concept stayed on the Folk. So there was not the colonial realism. He produced 'Chae-suk-jang' - which responsed the actual reality - but such attempt could not continued. Because there was too big difference between the idel life and the real life which he recognized. After all we can conclude that his literary works were possible on the ground of abstract Idealism. We could see the dual life of a colonial intellectual and the literary response in the life of Ju Yo-han, but on the other hand it is not individual problem, it is a misery of the history of Korean modern literature.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "<창조>", ~
  2. "<조선문단>", ~
  3. "<조선지광>", ~
  4. "아름다운 새벽" (1924), 조선문단사
  5. "시가집" (1929), 삼천리사
  6. 김윤식, "우리 근대시 형성의 내면풍경-주요한론", 문학사상 (1980)
  7. 김윤식, "주요한 재론-<채석장>에 이르는 길", 심상, 9(2) (1981)
  8. 김흥규, "문학과 역사적 인간" (1980), 창작과 비평사
  9. 박민수, "현대시의 사회시학적 연구" (1989), 느티나무
  10. 손광은, "송아주요한시의 재평가", 한국언어문학, 15 (1977)
  11. 양왕용, "한국근대시연구" (1982), 삼영사
  12. 오세영, "한국낭만주의시연구" (1980), 일지사
  13. 임종국, "친일문학론" (1979), 평화출판사
  14. 임형택, "항일민족시", 대동문화연구, 14 (1981)
  15. 정한모, "한국현대시사연구" (1974), 일지사
  16. 조동일, "한국문학통사" (1989), 지식산업사
  17. 주요한, "나의 창조시대", pp.10~ (1979), 문학사상
  18. 주요한, "내가 뽑은 나의 대표작" (1973), 시문학
  19. 주요한, "창조시대의 문단", pp.6~ (1956), 자유문학
  20. 홍신선, "살아있는 근세사-요한의 파란의 역정-", 시문학 (1973)
  21. Edmund Wilson, "Axel's Castle" (1985), 홍성사
  22. Edward Lucie-Smith, "Symbolist Art" (1987), 열화당
  23. Philippe Van Tighem, "Les grandes doctrines litteraires en France" (1981), 문학사상사
  24. Rene Wellek, "Discriminations;Further Concepts of Criticism" (1970), Yale University
  25. W.K.Wimsatt, "Literary Criticism;A Short History" (1978), The University of Chicago Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)