일상‧비일상적 지식장과 젠더의 안티노미 - 2015 개정 교육과정 『고등학교 일본어Ⅰ‧Ⅱ』를 중심으로 -
Daily and Non-daily Fields of Knowledge and Antinomy of Gender - Focusing on “High School Japanese Ⅰ․Ⅱ” of the 2015 Revised Curriculum -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本稿では、日本語教科書の中に当然かつ自然な現象として、公然と紹介されている「男性対女性」という二分法的な論理と範疇の解体、または再構成を通じて、男女「疎通の回路」と「相互共存」の理論を体現するための、一つの方法論として「ジェンダー」を対象に考えてみた。このために、第一に、日本語教科書の中に目立たないけれど、その中に内在されている日常の中の家庭生活と社会生活に現れるジェンダーの不均衡を身体とつなげて考えてみた。第二に、非日常の中でジェンダー文化と伝統文化から主体と他者の二分化されたジェンダー偏向に対して診断してみた。第三に、本稿の目指す点であるジェンダーフリーな教科書を作る一つの方法として、「ジェンダー」理論を考察し読解することによって、日本語教科書の中に提示された「ジェンダーフリー」の可能性を抽出した。男女の性別役割分業の描写が多かった既存の教科書とは違って、2015改訂では主体内部の亀裂を見せて、家事は女性だけの仕事でなく、男女が協業すべき仕事であると理解された。また、女性文化と男性文化は、どちらか一つの文化に偏ったり特化したりするのではなく、人間の普遍の文化であるとしている。特に、男女を会社員という設定にしたことは、男女の領域の境界線引きから境界線の曖昧化に転化し、領域を行ったり来たりする「ジェンダー横断」を通じて、新たなジェンダーの再編が可能であることを理解された。それと同時に、非日常の中の伝統文化を通じて、他者を否定するから他者を認めるへの、ジェンダー融和が可能であることを見せている。このような一連の研究を通じて、日本語教科書の中に現れている「ジェンダー」を考察し読解することにより、ジェンダーに対する本当の理解と男女の疎通を基にした男女の調和を作りだして均衡を取り、ジェンダーフリー的な教科書を制作することができる。
Abstract
This study is centered on considering ‘Gender’ in the aspect of a methodology to embody theories regarding ‘circuit of communication’ and ‘mutual coexistence’ between male and female, through the breakup or reconstitution of dichotomous logics and categories as ‘male vs. female,’ publicly explained as a reasonable and natural phenomenon in Japanese textbooks. First, daily Gender imbalance inherent in Japanese textbooks was examined in relation to the body. Second, Gender bias dichotomized into the subject and the other in Gender culture and traditional culture was examined. Third, the ‘Gender-Free’ possibility implicit in Japanese textbooks was abstracted by reading and thinking about ‘Gender’ theories in a way to create Gender-Free textbooks, which is the directing point of this study. As opposed to existing textbooks that contain a lot of descriptions as to the division of Gender roles between male and female, the textbooks revised in 2015 show cracks from inside the subject, suggesting that houseworks in daily lives need collaboration between male and female rather than belonging only to female. Further, female culture and male culture were found to be a universal culture of mankind, rather than limited to or specialized in the culture of either male or female. As male and female were set as company employees, ‘Trans-Gender,’ meaning a transition from ‘drawing a boundary’ between the territories of male and female to ‘crossing the boundary,’ was shown to enable the rearrangement into a new Gender. In addition, traditional culture in non-daily lives presented the possibility of Gender harmony which pursues ‘recognition of the other,’ not ‘denial of the other.’
참고문헌 (25)
- 김동규, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~180 (2017), 파고다북스
- 권김현영, "남성성과 젠더", pp.1~166 (2011), 자음과 모음
- 로빈 라일, "젠더란 무엇인가", pp.1~341 (2015), 한울
- 린다 맥도웰, "젠더, 정체성, 장소", pp.1~443 (2010), 한울
- 박행자, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~200 (2017), 능률교육
- 박행자, "고등학교 일본어Ⅱ", pp.1~176 (2017), 능률교육
- 배홍철, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~191 (2017), 천재교과서
- 배홍철, "고등학교 일본어Ⅱ", pp.1~176 (2017), 천재교과서
- 아드리엔 리치, "더 이상 어머니는 없다", pp.1~384 (2002), 평민사
- 안병곤, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~202 (2017), 에듀서울
- 오현정, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~200 (2017), 미래엔
- 오현정, "고등학교 일본어Ⅱ", pp.1~176 (2017), 미래엔
- 윤강구, "2015개정교육과정(일본어Ⅰ)의 검토와 개선 방안", 일어일문학, (72), pp.145~163 (2016), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
- 윤강구, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~206 (2017), 다락원
- 윤강구, "고등학교 일본어Ⅱ", pp.1~191 (2017), 다락원
- 이경수, "2015改訂日本語敎育課程と意思疏通基本表現 - 2009改訂日本語敎育課程との對照 -", 日本語敎育, (78), pp.1~16 (2016), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- 이경수, "고등학교 일본어Ⅰ", pp.1~192 (2017), 시사일본어사
- 이경수, "고등학교 일본어Ⅱ", pp.1~176 (2017), 시사일본어사
- 엘리자베스 바댕테르, "만들어진 모성", pp.1~416 (2009), 동녘
- 정유성, "따로와 끼리-남성 지배문화 벗기기", pp.1~136 (2006), 책세상
- 존 스튜어트 밀, "여성의 종속", pp.1~225 (2009), 책세상
- 주디스 버틀러, "젠더트러블", pp.1~375 (2009), 문학동네
- 주디스 버틀러, "젠더허물기", pp.1~431 (2015), 문학과지성사
- 줄리아 우드, "젠더에 갇힌 삶", pp.1~511 (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 피에르 부르디외, "남성지배", pp.1~172 (2003), 동문선
