본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신라 상고기 ‘태자’의 성격과 등장 배경

The Characteristics and Background of ‘Crown Prince’ in the Early Silla

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper examines the records of Crown Prince(太子) before King Jinheung in the Samguksagi. It illuminates the nature of the Crown Princes as portrayed in the historical records and traces the background of their designation as princes in the Samguksagi. In the case of Silla, individuals referred to as Crown Princes are confirmed from the early period covered by the Samguksagi. However, the term “Crown Prince” may not have been used to address them during their time, given that the term could arise after using the title of king or emperor. Nevertheless, the fact that they were specifically recorded as princes in historical records suggests that they shared certain characteristics. The individuals identified as Crown Prince in the records include Namhae, Yuri, Jima, Ilseong, Goljeong, and Uro. The case of Namhae is associated with the characteristics described in the Samgukyusa. The Samguksagi commentary also records a prince in the accession year of the father, which corresponds to Yuri. Jima is mentioned as a Crown Prince in the context of the origin of the royal title of Judah(酒多). it is noted that this article uses the title of king, not Isagum, indicating a later expression. Ilseong's complex genealogy raises doubts about the accuracy of the article recording him as Crown Prince. Goljeong and Uro, despite not ascending to the throne, are considered as their sons succeeded to the throne and were later addressed as Crown Prince. In conclusion, Indiviuals identified as “Crown Prince” in the historical records were all credible heirs to the throne, recognized as such to the extent that they were expected to ascend. However, merely holding the title of Crown Prince did not guarantee accession to the throne; one had to ascend through the bequeathal of the previous king or the approval of the people. The recording of these individuals as princes occurred during a period when the royal lineage was organized, and the title “King” was used as a royal title. Notable during this time is From Namul to Nulji. In this time, Silla, through Goguryeo and Chinese dynasties, likely understood the exclusive meaning of the title “King.” Nulji, who ascended to the throne with the support of Goguryeo, made various efforts to stabilize his reign. He brought back royal members who had sought refuge in Goguryeo, repaired ancestral shrines, and organized the genealogies of rival royal families. This was aimed at affirming the continuity of Silla's royal line from Hyekgeose(赫居世), formalizing it as an official recognition. In this process, the awareness of the official heir to the throne, the Crown Prince, emerged. However, due to continued Wa(倭) invasions, Goguryeo's dominance, and a lack of institutional foundation for the Crown Prince system, the implementation of the Crown Prince system did not progress further.

Abstract

This paper examines the records of Crown Prince(太子) before King Jinheung in the Samguksagi. It illuminates the nature of the Crown Princes as portrayed in the historical records and traces the background of their designation as princes in the Samguksagi. In the case of Silla, individuals referred to as Crown Princes are confirmed from the early period covered by the Samguksagi. However, the term “Crown Prince” may not have been used to address them during their time, given that the term could arise after using the title of king or emperor. Nevertheless, the fact that they were specifically recorded as princes in historical records suggests that they shared certain characteristics. The individuals identified as Crown Prince in the records include Namhae, Yuri, Jima, Ilseong, Goljeong, and Uro. The case of Namhae is associated with the characteristics described in the Samgukyusa. The Samguksagi commentary also records a prince in the accession year of the father, which corresponds to Yuri. Jima is mentioned as a Crown Prince in the context of the origin of the royal title of Judah(酒多). it is noted that this article uses the title of king, not Isagum, indicating a later expression. Ilseong's complex genealogy raises doubts about the accuracy of the article recording him as Crown Prince. Goljeong and Uro, despite not ascending to the throne, are considered as their sons succeeded to the throne and were later addressed as Crown Prince. In conclusion, Indiviuals identified as “Crown Prince” in the historical records were all credible heirs to the throne, recognized as such to the extent that they were expected to ascend. However, merely holding the title of Crown Prince did not guarantee accession to the throne; one had to ascend through the bequeathal of the previous king or the approval of the people. The recording of these individuals as princes occurred during a period when the royal lineage was organized, and the title “King” was used as a royal title. Notable during this time is From Namul to Nulji. In this time, Silla, through Goguryeo and Chinese dynasties, likely understood the exclusive meaning of the title “King.” Nulji, who ascended to the throne with the support of Goguryeo, made various efforts to stabilize his reign. He brought back royal members who had sought refuge in Goguryeo, repaired ancestral shrines, and organized the genealogies of rival royal families. This was aimed at affirming the continuity of Silla's royal line from Hyekgeose(赫居世), formalizing it as an official recognition. In this process, the awareness of the official heir to the throne, the Crown Prince, emerged. However, due to continued Wa(倭) invasions, Goguryeo's dominance, and a lack of institutional foundation for the Crown Prince system, the implementation of the Crown Prince system did not progress further.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 강종훈, "신라상고사연구" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
  2. 김두진, "삼국유사의 사학사적 연구" (2014), 일조각
  3. 나희라, "신라의 국가제사" (2003), 지식산업사
  4. 선석열, "新羅國家成立過程硏究" (2001), 혜안
  5. 선석열, "신라 왕위계승 원리 연구" (2015), 혜안
  6. 이기동, "新羅 骨品制社會와 花郞徒" (1990), 一潮閣
  7. 이기백, "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1974), 一潮閣
  8. 이광규, "韓國家族의 史的硏究" (1990), 一志社
  9. 이종욱, "新羅上代王位繼承硏究" (1980), 영남대학교 출판부
  10. 이종욱, "新羅國家形成史硏究" (1982), 一潮閣
  11. 장창은, "신라 상고기 정치변동과 고구려 관계" (2008), 신서원
  12. 전덕재, "삼국사기 본기의 원전과 편찬" (2018), 주류성
  13. 채미하, "신라 국가제사와 왕권" (2008), 도서출판 혜안
  14. 末松保和, "新羅史の諸問題" (1954), 東洋文庫
  15. 池內宏, "朝鮮史硏究 上世2" (1960), 吉川弘文館
  16. 今西龍, "新羅 葛文王考", 신라사학보, 2 (2004)
  17. 강종훈, "강좌 한국고대사5" (2002), 가락국사적개발연구원
  18. 김광수, "新羅 上古世系의 再構成 圖式", 東洋學, 3 (1973)
  19. 김병곤, ""삼국사기"내 책봉 기사로 본 삼국의 태자제 운영 양상 및 정치적 위상", 사학연구, 100 (2010)
  20. 김병곤, "신라의 태자 책봉제 수용 과정 고찰", 韓國古代史硏究, 64 (2011)
  21. 김재홍, "신라 마립간시기 왕위계승원리와 왕권의 성격", 韓國古代史硏究, 105 (2022)
  22. 김창겸, "新羅時代 太子制度의 性格", 新羅上古史學報, 13 (1993)
  23. 박수진, "신라 갈문왕호의 성립배경에 관한 연구", 선사와 고대, 57 (2018)
  24. 서의식, "新羅 上代의 王位繼承과 聖骨", 韓國史硏究, 86 (1994)
  25. 선석열, "新羅 上古紀年의 재조정", 경대사론, 9 (1996)
  26. 선석열, "신라 실성왕의 즉위과정", 지역과 역사, 34 (2014)
  27. 신형식, "柳洪烈博士 華甲紀念論叢" (1971), 探求堂
  28. 왕서현, "4세기 말~5세기 초 신라의 質 파견과 외교 정책", 석사, 사학과, pp.2023
  29. 양정석, "신라 마립간기 왕의 통치형태", 신라문화, 15 (1998)
  30. 이강래, "강좌 한국고대사1" (2003), 가락국사적개발연구원
  31. 이기동, "新羅社會史硏究" (1997), 一潮閣
  32. 이문기, "6세기 신라 ‘대왕’의 성립과 그 국제적 계기", 신라문화제학술발표회논문집, 9 (1988)
  33. 이순근, "新羅時代 姓氏取得과 그 意味", 韓國史學, 6 (1980)
  34. 이승현, "新羅의 東宮制度", 韓國古代史硏究, 55 (2009)
  35. 이인철, "新羅上古世系의 新解釋", 청계사학, 4 (1987)
  36. 이현주, "신라 태자제의 수용과 왕실의 ‘家族’ 인식", 新羅史學報, 55 (2022)
  37. 정운용, "5世紀 高句麗 勢力圈의 南限", 史叢, 35 (1989)
  38. 조범환, "新羅 上代 太子制의 運營과 東宮의 設置", 신라문화, 35 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)