新羅 下代 王位繼承 分爭과 國人
The Conflict Over Succession To The Throne in the Latter Period of Silla Dynasty And The Kukin(國人)
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is about the cause, background, and characteristic of the conflict over succession to the throne in the the Latter Period of Silla Dynasty. King Heongdeok, King Huigang, King Minae, and King Sinmu’s ascending to the throne are all relevant to the topic, and this paper focuses on the process of King Huigang. To find out the background of the conflicts, the present writer confirmed examples in the succession to the throne in overall Silla Dynasty. As a result, it was found out that the Kukin(國人) had somebody as a king whenever the king had a problem having a son to carry on the crown. Therefore, it was deducted that the conflict over succession to the throne after King Heongdeok resulted from the fact that the Kukin(國人) couldn’t have somebody as a king. Also, it wasn't easy because the Kukin(國人) was absorbed by each faction of the royal family. Moreover, it was found out that the Kukin(國人) and the royalty had the relative relationship. Many researchers have argued that this conflict affected the fall of the Silla Dynasty. However, the present writer tried to regard it as a temporary phenomenon and the succession to the throne went on stably afterwards.
Abstract
This paper is about the cause, background, and characteristic of the conflict over succession to the throne in the the Latter Period of Silla Dynasty. King Heongdeok, King Huigang, King Minae, and King Sinmu’s ascending to the throne are all relevant to the topic, and this paper focuses on the process of King Huigang. To find out the background of the conflicts, the present writer confirmed examples in the succession to the throne in overall Silla Dynasty. As a result, it was found out that the Kukin(國人) had somebody as a king whenever the king had a problem having a son to carry on the crown. Therefore, it was deducted that the conflict over succession to the throne after King Heongdeok resulted from the fact that the Kukin(國人) couldn’t have somebody as a king. Also, it wasn't easy because the Kukin(國人) was absorbed by each faction of the royal family. Moreover, it was found out that the Kukin(國人) and the royalty had the relative relationship. Many researchers have argued that this conflict affected the fall of the Silla Dynasty. However, the present writer tried to regard it as a temporary phenomenon and the succession to the throne went on stably afterwards.
참고문헌 (48)
- "삼국사기 권10", ~
- "신라본기10 神武王 末尾 ‘論曰’", ~
- 金昌謙, "新羅下代 王位繼承硏究" (2003), 景仁文化社
- 최의광, "新羅下代 遺詔에 의한 王位 繼承 硏究", 韓國史學報, (44), pp.229~269 (2011), 고려사학회
- 조범환, "新羅 上代 太子制의 運營과 東宮의 設置", 신라문화, (35), pp.1~20 (2010), 신라문화연구소
- 김병곤, "신라의 태자 책봉제 수용 과정 고찰", 한국고대사연구, (64), pp.405~438 (2011), 한국고대사학회
- 三品彰英, "朝鮮史槪說", pp.70~ (1940), 弘文堂
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究", pp.190~ (1974), 一潮閣
- 李基東, "新羅下代의 王位繼承과 政治過程", 歷史學報, 85, pp.11~ (1980)
- 崔柄憲, "新羅下代 社會의 動搖", 한국사, 3, pp.427~509 (1978)
- 吳星, "新羅 元聖王系의 王位交替, In 全海宗博士華甲紀念史學論叢" (1979)
- 尹炳喜, "新羅 下代 均貞系의 王位繼承과 金陽", 歷史學報, 96, pp.74~75 (1982)
- 최의광, "新羅 元聖王의 王位繼承과 國人", 韓國史學報, (37), pp.63~103 (2009), 고려사학회
- 權英五, "신라하대 왕위계승 분쟁과 민애왕", 한국고대사연구, 19, pp.264~ (2000)
- 李基東, "新羅下代의 王位繼承과 政治過程, In 新羅 骨品制社會와 花郞徒", pp.165~ (1984), 一潮閣
- "삼국사기 권10 신라본기10 閔哀王 즉위조", ~
- 李明植, "新羅政治變遷史硏究", pp.44~ (2003), 螢雪出版社
- 姜聲媛, "新羅時代 叛逆의 歷史的 性格", 韓國史硏究, 43, pp.23~60 (1982)
- 崔致遠, "鳳巖寺智證大師寂照塔碑", 譯註韓國古代金石文, 3, pp.200~
- 최홍조, "新羅 哀莊王代의 政治改革과 그 性格", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.301~366 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- "삼국사기 권1 신라본기 1 婆娑王尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "三國史記 권2 新羅本紀 2 伐休尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권2 신라본기 2 味鄒尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권2 신라본기2 訖解尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권3 신라본기 3 實聖尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권5 신라본기 5 善德王 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권5 신라본기 5 太宗王 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권8 신라본기 8 聖德王 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권9 신라본기 9 宣德王 6年條", ~
- "삼국사기 권10 신라본기 10 元聖王 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권12 신라본기 12 神德王卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권3 신라본기3 奈勿尼師今 卽位條", ~
- "삼국사기 권4 신라본기 4 智證麻立干 卽位條", ~
- 최재석, "韓國家族制度史硏究", pp.140~ (1983), 一志社
- 李鍾恒, "和白-그 起源과 構成과 權限을 중심으로-｣", 國民大論文輯, pp.69~78 (1971)
- 신형식, "新羅史", pp.72~ (1985), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 박남수, "신라화백회의 연구현황과 중층적 회의구조", 신라문화, (30), pp.29~72 (2007), 신라문화연구소
- 金麟坤, "和白會議의 機能", 社會科學, 11, pp.401~ (1980)
- 이기동, "新羅下代의 王位繼承과 政治過程", 歷史學報, 85, pp.22~23 (1980)
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究", pp.124~ (1974), 一潮閣
- 김창겸, "新羅下代 推戴에 의한 王位繼承의 性格", 淸溪史學, 16･17, pp.656~657 (2002)
- "삼국사기 권 10신라본기 10 閔哀王 卽位條", ~
- 李仁哲, "新羅의 王權과 政治構造- 군신회의 구성원의 변화를 중심으로 -", 신라문화, (22), pp.104~132 (2003), 신라문화연구소
- 日野開三郞, "羅末三國の 對大陸海上交通貿易(2)", 朝鮮學報, 17, pp.106~ (1960)
- 徐榮敎, "淸海鎭과 西南海岸의 田莊･牧場", STRATEGY 21, pp.97~ (2001)
- 이기동, "張保皐와 그의 海上王國, In 張保皐의 新硏究", pp.115~ (1985), 莞島文化院
- 浦生京子, "新羅末期 張保皐의 擡頭와 叛亂", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 16, pp.64~65 (1979)
- 李鍾旭, "新羅時代의 眞骨", 東亞硏究, 6, pp.246~ (1985)