近親婚을 통해 본 奈勿王 직계의 권력 장악과 智證王 계보 전승
Power grab of King Naemul’s direct descendants and genealogy transmission of King Jijeung focusing on the incestuous marriages
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to the son-in-law’s right of throne succession, Kim of Silla was included in the top tier in the Yisageum period(尼師今期) and King Naemul(奈勿王)’s direct descendants monopolized the throne in the Maripgan period(麻立干期). The direct descendants of King Naemul made the opposite use of it through incestuous marriages to prevent the succession of the throne to other household figures. In addition, as the king’s younger brother became the father of the queen because of the incestuous marriages, they could even take the position of Galmunwang(葛文王). It caused the change in the qualification of Galmunwang, and in middle ancient period(中古期), there was a character who became Galmunwang in the status of only a king's younger brother. As such, King Naemul's direct descendants actively utilized the incestuous marriages in the process of grabbing the power. It has been difficult to explain the differences in a coherently by identifying the genealogy of King Jijeung(智證王) in Samguk-sagi and Samguk-yusa only as his fathers’ genealogy. Examining his ancestors’ incestuous marriages, we can find that his mother’s genealogy remained in the record of Samguk-sagi. So, each of these two records represents both maternal and paternal genealogy, which together lead the reconstruction of complex blood ties caused by incestuous marriages. In addition, coexistence of various genealogies, which characteristic of Silla’s genealogy awareness, could be seen through Yichadon(異次頓) and King Munmu(文武王). This study found that King Soji(炤智王) designated his closest relative Jidoro(King Jijeung’s name before enthrone) as Galmunwang, and Jidoro succeeded to King Soji in order to keep on gripping power and monopolizing the throne by King Naemul’s descendants in the direct line.
Abstract
Due to the son-in-law’s right of throne succession, Kim of Silla was included in the top tier in the Yisageum period(尼師今期) and King Naemul(奈勿王)’s direct descendants monopolized the throne in the Maripgan period(麻立干期). The direct descendants of King Naemul made the opposite use of it through incestuous marriages to prevent the succession of the throne to other household figures. In addition, as the king’s younger brother became the father of the queen because of the incestuous marriages, they could even take the position of Galmunwang(葛文王). It caused the change in the qualification of Galmunwang, and in middle ancient period(中古期), there was a character who became Galmunwang in the status of only a king's younger brother. As such, King Naemul's direct descendants actively utilized the incestuous marriages in the process of grabbing the power. It has been difficult to explain the differences in a coherently by identifying the genealogy of King Jijeung(智證王) in Samguk-sagi and Samguk-yusa only as his fathers’ genealogy. Examining his ancestors’ incestuous marriages, we can find that his mother’s genealogy remained in the record of Samguk-sagi. So, each of these two records represents both maternal and paternal genealogy, which together lead the reconstruction of complex blood ties caused by incestuous marriages. In addition, coexistence of various genealogies, which characteristic of Silla’s genealogy awareness, could be seen through Yichadon(異次頓) and King Munmu(文武王). This study found that King Soji(炤智王) designated his closest relative Jidoro(King Jijeung’s name before enthrone) as Galmunwang, and Jidoro succeeded to King Soji in order to keep on gripping power and monopolizing the throne by King Naemul’s descendants in the direct line.
참고문헌 (48)
- 申瀅植, "新羅史의 時代區分: 三國史記 內容分析을 中心으로", 韓國史硏究, 18 (1977)
- 新羅上代王位繼承硏究, "李鍾旭", 嶺南大學校 民族文化硏究所, ~ (1980)
- 李喜寬, "新羅上代 智證王系의 王位繼承과 朴氏王妃族", 東亞硏究, 20 (1990)
- 김창겸, "신라 중고기 왕실계보와 왕위계승 연구- 특히, 파른본 ≪三國遺事≫ 王曆을 통하여 -", 신라사학보, (30), pp.65~118 (2014), 신라사학회
- 선석열, "신라 왕위계승 원리 연구" (2015), 혜안
- 李基東, "新羅 骨品制社會와 花郞徒" (1980), 一潮閣
- 盧重國, "譯註 韓國古代金石文 Ⅱ" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 文暻鉉, "迎日冷水里新羅碑에 보이는 部의 性格과 政治運營問題", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 李喜寬, "迎日冷水里碑에 보이는 至都盧葛文王에 대한 몇 가지 問題", 韓國學報, 60 (1990)
- 鄭求福, "迎日冷水里新羅碑의 金石學的 考察", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 朱甫暾, "迎日冷水里新羅碑에 대한 기초적 검토", 新羅文化, 6 (1989)
- 金羲滿, "新羅 智證․法興王代의 政治改革과 그 性格", 慶北史學, 23 (2000)
- 宣石悅, "麻立干時期의 王權과 葛文王", 신라문화, (22), pp.375~393 (2003), 신라문화연구소
- 李純根, "新羅時代 姓氏取得과 그 意味", 韓國史論, 6 (1980)
- 윤진석, "5∼6세기 신라의 정치운영과 갈문왕", 박사, 역사·고고학과, pp.2014
- "三國史記", ~
- 崔在錫, "新羅 王位繼承의 系譜認識과 政治勢力: 平和時의 政治勢力이 王位繼承을 左右할 수 있는가", 社會와 歷史, 17, pp.26~32 (1990)
- 이천우, "新羅 上古期 葛文王의 冊封과 變化", 석사, 사학과 한국사전공, pp.2014
- 한상복, "문화인류학", pp.170~173 (2011), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究", pp.196~197 (1974), 一潮閣
- 李光奎, "韓國家族의 史的硏究" (1977), 一志社
- 이재환, "新羅 眞骨의 ‘家系 分枝化’에 대한 재검토-사위의 왕위계승권을 중심으로-", 대구사학, 127, pp.79~115 (2017), 대구사학회[DOI]
- 河廷龍, "新羅上代 葛文王 硏究", 民族文化硏究, 27 (1994)
- 河廷龍, "新羅上代 王位繼承硏究: 王室內 近親婚을 中心으로", 新羅文化, 12 (1995)
- John Beatie, "社會人類學", pp.165~168 (1978), 一志社
- 今西龍, "新羅史硏究" (1933), 近澤書店
- 李基白, "新羅時代의 葛文王", 歷史學報, 58, pp.12~13 (1974)
- 이천우, "신라 상고기 지도로의 갈문왕 책봉과 왕위 계승", 서강인문논총, (46), pp.133~168 (2016), 인문과학연구소
- 金相鉉, "三國遺事 王曆篇 檢討: 王曆 撰者에 대한 疑問", 東洋學, 15 (1985)
- 김상현, "삼국유사 고판본과 파른본의 위상", 동방학지, (162), pp.3~27 (2013), 국학연구원
- 하일식, "파른본 삼국유사 교감" (2016), 혜안
- "파른본 삼국유사 교감" (2016), 혜안
- 이부오, "파른본 ≪三國遺事≫ 王曆의 판본상 위치와 異表記의 서술맥락", 신라사학보, (30), pp.1~63 (2014), 신라사학회
- 朴南守, "新羅 和白會議에 관한 再檢討", 신라문화, (21), pp.314~342 (2003), 신라문화연구소
- 장창은, "신라 訥祗王代 고구려세력의 축출과 그 배경", 한국고대사연구, 33, pp.211~248 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- 末松保和, "新羅史の諸問題", pp.188~ (1954), 東洋文庫
- 金永萬, "迎日冷水里新羅碑의 語文學的 考察", 韓國古代史硏究, 3, pp.73~ (1990)
- 강종훈, "신라상고사연구", pp.34~ (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 金毅圭, "新羅 母系制 社會說에 대한 檢討: 新羅親族硏究(其一)", 韓國史硏究, 23 (1979)
- 강종훈, "『삼국유사』 ｢흥법｣편 ‘원종흥법 염촉멸신’조 고찰", 新羅文化祭學術發表論文集, 35, pp.213~ (2014)
- 金哲埈, "韓國古代社會硏究", pp.173~177 (1975), 知識産業社
- "高麗史", ~
- 김창겸, "신라 승려 心地 연구: 삼국유사 ｢心地繼祖｣와 관련하여", 新羅文化祭學術發表論文集, 34, pp.217~218 (2013)
- 장창은, "新羅 智證王의 執權과 對高句麗 防衛體系의 확립", 한국고대사연구, (45), pp.97~131 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 문경현, "上中古期 新羅六部의 史的 考察", 國史館論叢, 45 (1993)
- 崔在錫, "韓國의 親族用語", pp.104~105 (1988), 民音社
- 崔光植, "新羅의 神宮 設置에 대한 新考察", 韓國史硏究, 43, pp.62~65 (1983)
- 全德在, "新羅 州郡制의 成立背景硏究", 韓國史論, 22, pp.45~50 (1990)