본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

결속성의 등가에 기반한 루쉰의 『아큐정전』 번역 평가

Evaluation of Korean Translation of “The True Story of Ah Q” Based on Equivalence of Coherence

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The objective of this paper is to help a reader select the best translation and to provide guidance on improvement of translation quality through comparison analysis between two representative Korean translations of one of the most famous Chinese pieces in Korea, “The True Story of Ah Q” written by Lu Xun. This paper takes ‘equivalence of coherence’ to be an important criterion for evaluation, and analyzes and compares two translated works by focusing on where language and cultural differences cause the wide gulf in understanding between ST and TT readers. In addition, it adopts an approach of classifying the translation methods of culture-bound lexis into four types: annotation, insertion of textual intervention, naturalization and borrowing, and examining each method based on its own standard. After the analysis, it revealed that the reader of TT2, with lack of background information, has difficulty in keeping coherence even though the work provides a lot of explanations and annotations. Therefore, the latter is relatively appropriate for those who have abundant knowledge in Chinese characters and wish to have an in-depth understanding of the literary work.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to help a reader select the best translation and to provide guidance on improvement of translation quality through comparison analysis between two representative Korean translations of one of the most famous Chinese pieces in Korea, “The True Story of Ah Q” written by Lu Xun. This paper takes ‘equivalence of coherence’ to be an important criterion for evaluation, and analyzes and compares two translated works by focusing on where language and cultural differences cause the wide gulf in understanding between ST and TT readers. In addition, it adopts an approach of classifying the translation methods of culture-bound lexis into four types: annotation, insertion of textual intervention, naturalization and borrowing, and examining each method based on its own standard. After the analysis, it revealed that the reader of TT2, with lack of background information, has difficulty in keeping coherence even though the work provides a lot of explanations and annotations. Therefore, the latter is relatively appropriate for those who have abundant knowledge in Chinese characters and wish to have an in-depth understanding of the literary work.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Mona Baker, "말 바꾸기" (2004), 한국문화사
  2. 구문규, "《阿Q正傳》硏究 ―諷刺에 주목하여―", 중국어문논역총간, 15, pp.169~198 (2005), 중국어문논역학회
  3. 수잔 바스넷, "번역학 이론과 실제" (2004), 한신문화사
  4. Beaugrande, "텍스트 언어학 입문 in : Introduction to Text Linguistics" (2002), 한신문화사
  5. 선영아, "텍스트의 안과 밖- 역주(譯註)에 대한 두 가지 생각", 불어불문학연구, (71), pp.377~400 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
  6. 이근희, "번역의 이론과 실제 : 번역의 정의에서 번역의 전략까지" (2008), 한국문화사
  7. 이석규, "텍스트 분석의 실제" (2003), 亦樂
  8. 이석규, "언어의 예술" (2007), 글누림
  9. "이은혜(2005). 「고전번역비평 최고 번역본을 찾아서」. 교수신문 2005년 8월 30일", ~
  10. Marianne Lederer, "번역의 오늘 : 해석 이론" (2001), 고려대학교 출판부
  11. 정호정, "제대로 된 통역.번역의 이해" (2008), 한국문화사
  12. 張學軍, "魯迅的諷刺藝術" (1994), 山東大學出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)