본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

원문 이해 여부에 따른 번역 평가 비교

Analyzing How Source Text Knowledge Influences Translation Evaluation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

In the educational field, instructors who understand source texts assess faithfulness (accuracy) and readability while looking at translations in the mirror of source texts. In the other fields, however, clients or readers who cannot comprehend source texts are likely to assess readability only. This paper investigates how ST knowledge influences translation assessment. For a purpose of research, assessment experimental groups are divided into ST knowledgeable group and ST un-knowledgeable group. Both groups are assigned to conduct quantitative evaluation (100 points) and qualitative feedback. Evaluation subjects are eight source texts and their translations. Two source texts are collected from four languages each and every source text has five different target texts. In the analysis of quantitative evaluation, TTs ranked the lowest are concurred between the two groups, while TTs ranked the highest differ. Feedback analysis confirms that ST knowledgeable group places accuracy ahead of readability, while ST un-knowledgeable group puts emphasis on readability. STs whose translation assessments were in stark contrast between the two groups are all three and fall into a genre requiring accuracy.

Abstract

In the educational field, instructors who understand source texts assess faithfulness (accuracy) and readability while looking at translations in the mirror of source texts. In the other fields, however, clients or readers who cannot comprehend source texts are likely to assess readability only. This paper investigates how ST knowledge influences translation assessment. For a purpose of research, assessment experimental groups are divided into ST knowledgeable group and ST un-knowledgeable group. Both groups are assigned to conduct quantitative evaluation (100 points) and qualitative feedback. Evaluation subjects are eight source texts and their translations. Two source texts are collected from four languages each and every source text has five different target texts. In the analysis of quantitative evaluation, TTs ranked the lowest are concurred between the two groups, while TTs ranked the highest differ. Feedback analysis confirms that ST knowledgeable group places accuracy ahead of readability, while ST un-knowledgeable group puts emphasis on readability. STs whose translation assessments were in stark contrast between the two groups are all three and fall into a genre requiring accuracy.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 김련희, "번역교육 현장에서의 번역물 평가에 대한 제언", 인문과학연구, 13, pp.79~98 (2007)
  2. 김진아, "번역 품질평가에 관한 小考", 외국문학연구, (11), pp.4~124 (2002), 외국문학연구소
  3. 성초림, "번역교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~56 (2001)
  4. 안인경, "번역 가독성 개념에 대하여", 언어과학연구, (74), pp.147~168 (2015), 언어과학회
  5. 이향, "번역품질평가의 현황과 과제", 번역학연구, 11(2), pp.107~125 (2010), 한국번역학회
  6. 장혜선, "목적별 번역 평가 모델에 관한 小考 - 국내외 번역품질평가(TQA) 분석을 중심으로 -", 외국어교육연구, 25(1), pp.107~136 (2011), 외국어교육연구소
  7. 장혜선, "번역평가를 위한 번역오류 기술 및 분류에 관한 소(小)연구 -통번역대학원 수강생들의일한(JK) 번역물 오류 분석을 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(62), pp.99~132 (2014), 한국일본어문학회
  8. 장혜선, "전문 번역교육을 위한 품질평가 모델 구축에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문", pp.2014

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)