중-한 문학번역의 주제 전개 방식 비교 연구 -루쉰의 아Q정전과 21개의 한역본을 중심으로-
Thematic progression in the Chinese-Korean translation of literature: A quantitative study of Lu Xun’s ‘The True Story of Ah Q’ and its 21 Korean translations
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drawing on the concept of thematic progression based on Daneš (1974) and Zhu’s (1995) classification, this paper quantitatively compares the thematic progressions in the literary work ‘The True Story of Ah Q’ and its 21 Korean translations, to demonstrate how Chinese in the original and Korean in translations achieve textual equivalence in terms of cohesion. The theme, what the text is talking about, and the rheme, the development of the theme, maintain the cohesion of the text through thematic progression. The data analysis reveals that thematic progression patterns and their shifts in translation pertain to certain regularities in their frequency. In the original work, the Chinese language mainly uses ‘TP with a constant theme’, ‘simple linear TP’ and ‘TP with a constant rheme’ to organize the text, while the Korean translations also use ‘TP with derived theme’ and ‘TP with split rheme’ to organize the discourses. It is fair to say the Korean translations use a richer thematic progression than the original work. It highlights the fact that translators will generally follow the thematic progression of the original text in the process of the translation, but they also use additional thematic progressions in accordance with the Korean language to organize the texts.
Abstract
Drawing on the concept of thematic progression based on Daneš (1974) and Zhu’s (1995) classification, this paper quantitatively compares the thematic progressions in the literary work ‘The True Story of Ah Q’ and its 21 Korean translations, to demonstrate how Chinese in the original and Korean in translations achieve textual equivalence in terms of cohesion. The theme, what the text is talking about, and the rheme, the development of the theme, maintain the cohesion of the text through thematic progression. The data analysis reveals that thematic progression patterns and their shifts in translation pertain to certain regularities in their frequency. In the original work, the Chinese language mainly uses ‘TP with a constant theme’, ‘simple linear TP’ and ‘TP with a constant rheme’ to organize the text, while the Korean translations also use ‘TP with derived theme’ and ‘TP with split rheme’ to organize the discourses. It is fair to say the Korean translations use a richer thematic progression than the original work. It highlights the fact that translators will generally follow the thematic progression of the original text in the process of the translation, but they also use additional thematic progressions in accordance with the Korean language to organize the texts.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김일웅, "국어의 ‘주제-설명’ 구조", 언어 연구, 3, pp.95~118 (1980)
- 김동연, "영한 번역 텍스트에 나타나는 주제구조 비교", 언어과학, 18(4), pp.21~46 (2011), 한국언어과학회
- 이창수, "번역 및 비번역 영어 관광 안내문의주제 전개 방식 비교 연구", 통역과 번역, 16(3), pp.127~145 (2014), 한국통역번역학회
- 이희자, "국어의 ‘주제부", 설명부’ 구조 연구, 1994, pp.24, 319~351
- 이희자, "한국어교재 텍스트의 효율적인 분석 방법론 1: ‘주제부’의 텍스트 결속 기능에 대한 설명을 중심으로", 텍스트언어학, 10(0), pp.107~151 (2001)
- 정희자, "주제의 담화 기능에 관하여", 언어학, 19, pp.563~598 (1994)
- 조인정, "영한 번역의 문제: 주제 전개", 이중언어학, (26), pp.329~354 (2004), 이중언어학회
- 최경희, "학부 한영번역에서주제부 전개방식(Thematic development)의 사용: 문제 진단 및 전문가 번역과의 비교", 번역학연구, 18(5), pp.253~276 (2017), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 连淑能, "英汉对比研究" (2010), 高等教育出版社
- 彭宣维, "英汉语篇综合对比" (2000), 上海外语教育出版社
- 王斌, "主位推进的翻译结构与结构功能", 中国翻译, (1), pp.35~36 (2000)
- 朱勇生, "主位推进模式与语篇分析", 外语教学与研究, 27(3), pp.6~12 (1995)
- Alekseyenko, N. V., "A corpus-based study of theme and thematic progression in English and Russian non-translated texts and in Russian translated texts", 박사, pp.2013
- Baker, M., "Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies" (2009), Routledge
- Baker, M., "In Other Words: A Course Book on Translation" (2018), Routledge
- Bowcher, W. L., "The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics", pp.391~403 (2017), Routledge
- Daneš, F., "Zur linguistischen analyse der textstruktur", Folia Linguistica, 4, pp.72~78 (1970)
- Forey, G., "The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics", pp.131~145 (2017), Routledge
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning" (1978), Edward Arnold
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (1985), Edward Arnold
- Hatim, B., "Discourse and the Translator" (1990), Longman
- Alireza Jalilifar, "Thematic Development in English and Translated Academic Texts", Journal of Universal Language, 10(1), pp.81~111 (2009), 언어연구소
- Kim, M., "Using systemic functional text analysis for translator education: An illustration with a focus on the textual meaning", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 1(2), pp.223~246 (2007)
- Li, C., "Subject and Topic", pp.457~489 (1976), Academic Press
- Liu, X., "Thematic progression in English–Chinese translation of argumentative classics: a quantitative study of Francis Bacon’s ‘Of Studies’ and its 11 Chinese translations", Perspectives : Studies in Translatology, 21(2), pp.272~288 (2013)
- Mathesius, V., "A Functional Analysis of Present-Day English on a General Linguistic Basis" (1975), De Gruyter Mouton
- Rørvik, S., "Thematic progression in translation from English into Norwegian", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 2(2), pp.245~264 (2003)
- Ventola, E., "Thematic Development in English Texts", pp.85~104 (1995), Pinter