번역품질평가의 현황과 과제
Translation Quality Assessment: review and suggestions
3
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, there has been growing interest in the quality assessment of translation conducted in Korea, and serious discussions regarding translation quality, focused mainly on literary works, are being carried out. Within this context, this article outlines and examines some major trends of the theoretical approaches of translation quality assessment that have been discussed, and then describes some elements that should be taken into account in future discussions of translation quality. The first section of the article provides a brief introduction to the subjective/intuitive, response-based, linguistic, and functionalist approaches of translation quality assessment, and explains the characteristics and limitations of each approach. The following section presents fives aspects that have been overlooked in the existing evaluation models: the purpose of the evaluation, the applicability of evaluation models, the nature of source text, the evaluator, and the entire process of quality assurance.
Abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest in the quality assessment of translation conducted in Korea, and serious discussions regarding translation quality, focused mainly on literary works, are being carried out. Within this context, this article outlines and examines some major trends of the theoretical approaches of translation quality assessment that have been discussed, and then describes some elements that should be taken into account in future discussions of translation quality. The first section of the article provides a brief introduction to the subjective/intuitive, response-based, linguistic, and functionalist approaches of translation quality assessment, and explains the characteristics and limitations of each approach. The following section presents fives aspects that have been overlooked in the existing evaluation models: the purpose of the evaluation, the applicability of evaluation models, the nature of source text, the evaluator, and the entire process of quality assurance.
참고문헌 (22)
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가사업단, "영미명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가사업단, "영미명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서 Ⅱ" (2007), 창비
- 이상원, "한국출판번역독자들의 번역평가규범 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보(주)
- Baker, Mona, "Linguistic and cultural studies: Complementary or competing paradigms in Translation Studies?. in: Übersetzungswissenschaft im Umbruch: Festschrift fur Wolfram Wilss zum 70 Geburstag", pp.9~19 (1996), Gunter narr
- Bowker, Lynne, "A Corpus-based approach to evaluating student translations", The translator, 6(2), pp.183~210 (2000)
- Bowker, Lynne, "Towards a methodology for a corpus-based approach to translation evaluation", Meta, 46(2), pp.345~363 (2001)
- Chesterman, Andrew, "Causes, Translations, Effects", Target, 10(2), pp.201~230 (1998)
- Colina, Sonia, "Translation Quality Evaluation: Empirical Evidence for a Functionalist Approach", The Translator, 14(1), pp.97~134 (2008)
- Darbelnet, Jean, "Niveaux de traduction", Babel, 23(1), pp.6~17 (1977)
- Gouadec, Daniel, "Paramètres de l'évaluation des traductions", Meta, 26(2), pp.99~117 (1981)
- House, Juliane, "Translation quality assessment : A model revisited" (1997), Narr Verlag
- House, Juliane, "Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description versus social evaluation", Meta, 46(2), pp.297~301 (2001)
- Larose, Robert, "Méthodologie de l'évaluation des traductions", Meta, 41(2), pp.1~24 (1998)
- Maier, Carol, "Evaluation and Translation. Special Issue", The Translator: Studies in Intercultural Communication, 6(2) (2000)
- Mossop, Brian, "The workplace procedures of professional translators. in: Translation in context", pp.39~48 (1998)
- Mossop, Brian, "Revising and editing for translators" (2001), St. Jerome
- Nida, Eugene A, "Towards a science of Translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in bible translating" (1964), E. J. Brill
- Nida, Eugene A, "The theory and practice of translation" (1982), E. J. Brill
- Reiss, Katharina, "Translation criticism: The potentials & limitations: Categories and criteria for translation quality assessment. in: Moglichkeiten und Grenzen der Ubersetzungskritik" (2000), St. Jerome
- Steiner, Erich, "How (translated and otherwise interlingual) texts works is our way into what, why and to what effects", Target, 13(2), pp.343~348 (2001)
- Waddington, Christopher, "Different Methods of evaluating student translations: The question of validity", Meta, 46(2), pp.311~325 (2001)
- Williams, Malcolm, "The application of argumentation theory to translation quality assessment", Meta, 46(2), pp.326~344 (2001)