본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1970년대 말 중국의 진리 표준 토론과 새로운 사회주의 기호의 출현

The 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy in China and the Emergence of New Sign of Socialism

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Arguing that it is misleading to explain the meaning of the 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy from a political perspective, this paper suggests what the Controversy really brought about in chinese society in the late 1970s through an analysis of “Whateverists' Discourse(凡是論)” and “Practitioners' Discourse(實踐論).”During the Controversy, both of them tried to prove themselves to be affiliated with socialism by using the traditional signs of socialism(e. g. Marxist works or quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung), but “Practitioners”, contrary to “Whateverists”, made active use of the signs of natural science(e. g. particular example of chemistry, physics, medical science and so on). Of course, the signs of natural science was not the exclusive property of “Practitioners”, and others also made use of those signs in order to increase the credibility of their opinion, especially in the first controversy over truth criterion in the early 1960s. However, “Practitioners” was unique in that they went without the help and support of traditional signs of socialism. This means that the signs of natural science has the enough power to test the truth or falsehood of one's claims by themselves. This paper calls this as the reorganization of symbolic system of socialism, and holds that what the 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy brought about in Chinese society was this reorganization.

Abstract

Arguing that it is misleading to explain the meaning of the 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy from a political perspective, this paper suggests what the Controversy really brought about in chinese society in the late 1970s through an analysis of “Whateverists' Discourse(凡是論)” and “Practitioners' Discourse(實踐論).”During the Controversy, both of them tried to prove themselves to be affiliated with socialism by using the traditional signs of socialism(e. g. Marxist works or quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung), but “Practitioners”, contrary to “Whateverists”, made active use of the signs of natural science(e. g. particular example of chemistry, physics, medical science and so on). Of course, the signs of natural science was not the exclusive property of “Practitioners”, and others also made use of those signs in order to increase the credibility of their opinion, especially in the first controversy over truth criterion in the early 1960s. However, “Practitioners” was unique in that they went without the help and support of traditional signs of socialism. This means that the signs of natural science has the enough power to test the truth or falsehood of one's claims by themselves. This paper calls this as the reorganization of symbolic system of socialism, and holds that what the 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy brought about in Chinese society was this reorganization.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 黨的文獻 編輯部, "關於整理修改‘論十代關係’的三件檔案", 黨的文獻 (2007)
  2. 鄧小平, "兩個凡是”不符合馬克思主義 in 鄧小平文選⋅第二卷" (1994), 人民出版社
  3. 鄧小平, "在全國科學大會開幕式上的講話 in 鄧小平文選⋅第二卷" (1994), 人民出版社
  4. 特約評論員, "實踐是檢驗眞理的唯一標準", 光明日報 (1978)
  5. 郭建寧, "改革開放與中國特色社會主義" (2010), 北京大學出版社
  6. 何祚庥, "論自然科學硏究中有關實踐標準的若干問題", 紅旗, 2 (1962)
  7. 紅旗雜誌社論, "實現新時期總任務的强大思想武器", 紅旗, 7 (1978)
  8. 胡錦濤, "在紀念眞理標準討論二十周年座談會上的講話 in 實踐檢驗眞理, 實踐發展眞理" (1998), 中共中央黨校出版社
  9. 華國鋒, "中國共産黨中央委員會主席華國鋒同志在第二次全國農業學大寨會議上的講話", 人民日報 (1976)
  10. 晋楫, "“四人帮”是毛泽东思想的凶恶敌人", 红旗, (9) (1978)
  11. 李濟琛, "千秋功過" (1994), 光明日報出版社
  12. 黎石, "认真学习毛主席关于人民公社的理论", 红旗, 8 (1978)
  13. 齊振海, "自然科學中眞理和錯誤的相互關係", 新建設, 6 (1963)
  14. "學好文件抓住綱", 人民日報󰡕社論 (1977)
  15. 沈寶祥, "眞理標準問題討論始末" (2008), 中共黨史出版社
  16. 特约评论员, "马克思主义的一个最基本的原则", 解放军报 (1978)
  17. 哲學硏究 編輯部, "眞理問題討論集" (1964), 上海人民出版社
  18. 哲學硏究 編輯部, "實踐是檢驗眞理的唯一標準問題討論集第一集" (1979), 中國社會科學出版社
  19. 中共中央黨史硏究室第三硏究部, "改革開方30年" (2008), 遼寧人民出版社
  20. Bruno Latour, "Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society" (1987), Harvard University Press
  21. Frederick C. Teiwes, "Leadership, Legitimacy, and Conflict in China: From a Charismatic Mao to the Politics of Succession" (1984), Macmillan
  22. Jeffrey C. Alexander, "The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies" (1993), Theory and Society
  23. Peter R. Moody, "Chinese Politics after Mao: Development and Liberalization" (1983), Praeger
  24. Song Jian, "System Science and China's Economic Reform In Control Science and Technology for Developmen (CSTC'85)" (1986), Pergamon
  25. 十一大上的政治報告, "華國鋒", ~
  26. 甄岩, "毛澤東的重要探索 ― ‘論十代關係’的發表", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)