해방으로서의 ‘과학(科學)’ ― 신시기(新時期) 과학담론의 사상사적 의미에 대한 고찰
‘Science’ as Emancipation: Research on the Intellectual Discourse about ‘Science' in the New Era
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Throughout the whole history of modern and contemporary China, the concept ‘science' had very important role and meaning. From the May Fourth period, ‘science’ was represented as advanced civilization and culture of Western. And because of that critical role of science, there wan a severe quarrel on the matter of science, which is called as ‘debate on humanism and science'(kexuanlunzheng). After that debate, ‘scientific marxism’,which is based on the ‘natural dialectics’, surpassed another discourses, became the hegemonic ideology of contemporary China. ‘Scientific Marxism’ was the ‘highest form of truth’ in socialism China, ‘the transcendental truth’ had a hegemonic position. But during Cultural Revolution period, ‘the transcendental truth’ had stiffened the entire society, so some intellectuals, especially the scientists, wanted to use ‘another science’ to replace that hegemonic ideology which was based on ‘science Marxism’.
Abstract
Throughout the whole history of modern and contemporary China, the concept ‘science' had very important role and meaning. From the May Fourth period, ‘science’ was represented as advanced civilization and culture of Western. And because of that critical role of science, there wan a severe quarrel on the matter of science, which is called as ‘debate on humanism and science'(kexuanlunzheng). After that debate, ‘scientific marxism’,which is based on the ‘natural dialectics’, surpassed another discourses, became the hegemonic ideology of contemporary China. ‘Scientific Marxism’ was the ‘highest form of truth’ in socialism China, ‘the transcendental truth’ had a hegemonic position. But during Cultural Revolution period, ‘the transcendental truth’ had stiffened the entire society, so some intellectuals, especially the scientists, wanted to use ‘another science’ to replace that hegemonic ideology which was based on ‘science Marxism’.
참고문헌 (25)
- 郭穎頤, "中國現代思想中的唯科學主義(1900～1950)" (2010), 江蘇人民出版社
- 金觀濤, "觀念史硏究" (2009), 法律出版社
- 李新, "中國新民主主義革命時期通史" (1962), 人民出版社
- 李澤厚, "中國現代思想史論" (2012), 三聯書店
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集" (1985), 人民出版社
- 汪暉, "現代中國思想的興起 第二部 下卷" (2004), 三聯書店
- 張君勱, "科學與人生觀" (1998), 遼寧敎育出版社
- 林錦峰, "｢重評科學與玄學論戰｣質疑", 中山大學學報, (2) (1985)
- 劉靑峰, "二十世紀中國科學主義的兩次興起" (1991), 二十一世紀
- 邱仁宗, "探索認識的發生", 讀書, (5) (1982)
- 汪暉, "‘賽先生’在中國的命運", 學人, (1) (1991)
- Arif Dirlik, "Revolution and History" (1978), University of California Press
- Bill Brugger, "Chinese Marxism in the Post-Mao Era" (1990), Stanford University Press
- David Kelly, "Chinese Controversy on the Guiding Role of Philosophy over Science", The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, (14) (1985)
- Tang Tsou, "The Historic Change in Direction and Continuity with the Past", The China Quarterly, (98) (1984)
- 김창규, "1920年代 中國에서 ‘玄學’과 ‘科學’ 論爭", 중국사연구, (78), pp.129~160 (2012), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 鄭貴和, "1923년 중국의 문화 논쟁: 과학과 현학 논쟁", 중국문제연구 (1992)
- 조봉래, "1920년대 중국 지식인의 문화선택", 철학과 문화, 13 (2006)
- 조봉래, "1920年代 ‘科學과 人生觀 論爭’에 관한 小考", 한국철학논집, (18), pp.295~318 (2006), 한국철학사연구회
- 유희성, "과현(科玄) 논쟁과 지적 직각(智的直覺) - 자유의지와 결정론을 중심으로 -", 철학논집, 22, pp.165~189 (2010), 철학연구소
- 허남진, "과학과 인생관 논쟁", 인문논총 (2002)
- 허증, "1920년대 ‘과학․현학’ 논쟁과 ‘救亡’ 의식", 대구사학, 103, pp.239~278 (2011), 대구사학회
- 毛澤東, "모순론ㆍ실천론" (1989), 두레문고
- 錢理群, "모택동 시대와 포스트 모택동 시대(하)" (2012), 한울
- 프리드리히 엥겔스, "자연변증법" (2012), 새길 아카데미