〈風騷軌範〉의 〈分類補註李太白詩〉 수용과 재분류

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the concept of classification of “Pungsogwebum(風騷軌範: PSGB)” with the case of Li Bai(李白)’s poetry works. “PSGB” is compiled during King Seongjong’s reign to overcome the limitations of the compilations from China. Li Bai is the third largest number of works among Chinese poems in “PSGB”, following Su Shi(蘇軾) and Du Fu(杜甫). It seems that the editors of “PSGB” selected a total of 143 poems of Li Bai, referring mainly to “Classified and Annotated Poems of Li Taibai(分類補注李太白詩: CAPL)”, which is the earliest annotated edition of Li Bai’s poetry. It is first annotated by Yang Qixian(楊齊賢) in Song Dynasty and supplemented by Xiao Shiyun(蕭士贇) in Yuan Dynasty. This book was published during Sejong’s time, which greatly influenced the writers of the early Joseon Period. The classification method of this book seems to have been partially referenced in the classification of “PSGB”. However, there is a significant difference in the classification system and methods of “PSGB” and “CAPL”. “CAPL” is classified into a total of 21(22) categories by mixing style and subject classification, while “PSGB” was classified into 23體 6格 by styles and 21類 57賦 by subject. In the “PSGB”, Li Bai’s poems were reclassified by an independent standard, which is different from “CAPL”, except for three classification methods: balladmeasure(樂府體), relaxed type(閑適類), reminiscent type(懷古類). Comparing the method of classification of “PSGB” to the method of classification of “CAPL”, reveals three characteristics. First, the formal characteristics were more clearly identified by more granularity, while following the classification by style in “CAPL”. Second, the classification of a new method was attempted with different criteria from the topic-specific classification criteria in “CAPL”. A more detailed classification of the topic was made compared to the “CAPL”. Third, even when following the classification method of “CAPL”, the classification was focused on the characteristics of space and objects rather than subject sentiment or recipients of the poem. As seen above, “PSGB” is the result of overcoming the limitations of the classification of “CAPL”. However, in the process of classifying as above, some problems are also found in “PSGB”. Nevertheless, the results of the classification of works in “PSGB” are one of the representative examples of classification recognition in the Joseon Dynasty, and need to be used as a classification standard when establishing the Sino-Korean Poetry’s DB in the future.