학습 환경에 따른 중국인 한국어 학습자의 거절 화행 전략 사용 양상 연구 -ACKSL과 ACKFL을 중심으로
Study on the Use of Rejection Speech Acts Strategies by Chinese Learners of Korean According to the Learning Environment: Focusing on ACKSL and ACKFL
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the patterns of rejection speech acts' strategies used by Chinese learners of Korean according to their learning environments. In situations where invitations, requests, and suggestions are rejected using DCT, we examined which rejection strategies out of KS, CS, ACKSL, and ACKFL were used by the four groups, depending on the topic and variables, and we compared the strategies used by the two learner groups, i.e. ACKSL and ACKFL. We also evaluated which group was closer to KS or CS. The results of the study revealed that firstly, the rejection strategies used by the two groups, i.e. ACKSL and ACKFL, differed in situations where they rejected invitations from superiors and subordinates, requests from superiors and close friends, and suggestions from peers. Secondly, ACKSL showed a better ability to adjust appropriate rejection strategies according to intimacy compared to ACKFL. Thirdly, although ACKSL is logically closer to KS's utterance, both ACKSL and ACKFL may be influenced by their mother tongue when speaking, and they may be closer to CS in certain situations.
Abstract
This study examined the patterns of rejection speech acts' strategies used by Chinese learners of Korean according to their learning environments. In situations where invitations, requests, and suggestions are rejected using DCT, we examined which rejection strategies out of KS, CS, ACKSL, and ACKFL were used by the four groups, depending on the topic and variables, and we compared the strategies used by the two learner groups, i.e. ACKSL and ACKFL. We also evaluated which group was closer to KS or CS. The results of the study revealed that firstly, the rejection strategies used by the two groups, i.e. ACKSL and ACKFL, differed in situations where they rejected invitations from superiors and subordinates, requests from superiors and close friends, and suggestions from peers. Secondly, ACKSL showed a better ability to adjust appropriate rejection strategies according to intimacy compared to ACKFL. Thirdly, although ACKSL is logically closer to KS's utterance, both ACKSL and ACKFL may be influenced by their mother tongue when speaking, and they may be closer to CS in certain situations.
참고문헌 (12)
- 강미함, "학습 환경 요인이 화행 실현에 미치는 영향 - 의견불일치 상황에서의 화행 실현 양상을 중심으로", 우리말교육현장연구, 9(1), pp.205~242 (2015), 우리말교육현장학회[DOI]
- 강지원, "한국어 화자와 네덜란드어 화자의 거절 화행 및 전략 연구 - 비교문화적 화용론의 관점에서 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 60, pp.1~32 (2021), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당[DOI]
- 강효정, "중국인 학습자의 거절 화행 전략 사용 연구: 학습 환경과 학습 기간을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2015
- 김상미, "현대중국어 거절화행 연구-드라마와 영화 대사 사례 분석-", 석사, pp.2019
- 박소연, "한국어 학습 환경에 따른 ‘칭찬 반응 화행’ 전략 사용 양상 연구 -KSL, KFL 환경에서의 베트남인 대학생 한국어 학습자를 중심으로-", 언어와 문화, 15(4), pp.131~163 (2019), 한국언어문화교육학회[DOI]
- 신아영, "한국어 거절 화행 교육 방법 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육전공, pp.2014
- 응웬 티 응옥 란, "한국어 모어 화자와 베트남인 학습자의 거절 화행 전략 사용 비교 분석", 한국언어문화학, 19(3), pp.261~294 (2022), 국제한국언어문화학회
- 이상철, "화행과 화용적 전이", 국제언어문학, (27), pp.185~209 (2013), 국제언어문학회
- 이정화, "한국어 고급 학습자의 요청 화행 전략 실현 양상-사회적 변인을 중심으로-", 중한언어문화연구, 17, pp.173~194 (2019), 천진사범대학교 한국문화연구중심
- 홍승아, "한국어 학습자의 한국 거주기간에 따른 불평 화행의 인지 연구", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2010
- Brown, P., "Politeness: some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Wannaruk, A., "Pragmatic Transfer in Thai EFL Refusals", RELC Journal, 39(3), pp.318~337 (2008)
