문학비평 방법론의 적용·변주를 통한 문학교육 -『작가비평·주제비평·복수의 비평적 관점을 적용한 문학교육에 대한 상상 -
A Literary Education through Application and Variation of Literary-criticism Methodology
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The typical problems of our literary education lie in the fact that a works theory education centering around text analysis dominates. Among works criticism(works theory), writer criticism(writer theory) and subject criticism(subject theory), only works criticism is used as methodology of a literary education. The reason that a works theory becomes main methodology of a literary education is caused by the actual conditions of a literary education where excellent canons of Korean literary have to be evenly taught. But as a works theory becomes dominating methodology of a literary education, not a few problems occurred. For example, those problems include a shortsighted angle of pieces of work, lack of insights into the whole works of a writer, lack of ability of comparing various writers who represented the same theme, an insufficient viewpoint of literary history, etc. This paper, as a method for coping with those problems, proposes to appropriate critical methodology of writers and subject criticism as a literary-education method. Also it proposes that a literary-education method, in which multiple critical viewpoints of target works and writers exist, should be adopted. Through this, learners intend to improve problems, occurring by learners respectively partially learning literary works - however excellent. The key point of this paper is that the future literary education should be a comprehensive literary education giving learners the ability to see wholly works of a writer and compare various works and a writer and the appreciative eye to be able to prospect literary history from the broad view. Such an education will be a method of an ideal literary education leading to embodiment of literary essence and efficient utilization of literary-criticism methodology as literary-education methodology.
Abstract
The typical problems of our literary education lie in the fact that a works theory education centering around text analysis dominates. Among works criticism(works theory), writer criticism(writer theory) and subject criticism(subject theory), only works criticism is used as methodology of a literary education. The reason that a works theory becomes main methodology of a literary education is caused by the actual conditions of a literary education where excellent canons of Korean literary have to be evenly taught. But as a works theory becomes dominating methodology of a literary education, not a few problems occurred. For example, those problems include a shortsighted angle of pieces of work, lack of insights into the whole works of a writer, lack of ability of comparing various writers who represented the same theme, an insufficient viewpoint of literary history, etc. This paper, as a method for coping with those problems, proposes to appropriate critical methodology of writers and subject criticism as a literary-education method. Also it proposes that a literary-education method, in which multiple critical viewpoints of target works and writers exist, should be adopted. Through this, learners intend to improve problems, occurring by learners respectively partially learning literary works - however excellent. The key point of this paper is that the future literary education should be a comprehensive literary education giving learners the ability to see wholly works of a writer and compare various works and a writer and the appreciative eye to be able to prospect literary history from the broad view. Such an education will be a method of an ideal literary education leading to embodiment of literary essence and efficient utilization of literary-criticism methodology as literary-education methodology.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김동환, "문학교육의 관점에서 본 소설 읽기 방법의 재검토-교과서 속의 <메밀꽃 필 무렵>", 문학교육학, (22), pp.11~41 (2007), 한국문학교육학회
- 김명인, "김수영,근대를 향한 모험" (2002), 소명출판
- 김상욱, "문학교육 연구방법론의 확장과 그 실제 -서서텍스트의 표현능력을 중심으로", 문학교육학, (21), pp.11~40 (2006), 한국문학교육학회
- 남민우, "문학교육 목표 변천에 대한 비판적 고찰*-고등학교 문학교육과정을 중심으로", 문학교육학, (22), pp.121~154 (2007), 한국문학교육학회
- 박기범, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 문학 교과서의 내용 분석 연구 -수록된 문학 작품을 중심으로", 문학교육학, (11), pp.83~120 (2003), 한국문학교육학회
- 방민호, "자연과 자연 쪽에서 조망한 사회와 역사 - 이효석론(분화와 심화, 어둠 속의 풍경들 - 탄생 100주년 기념문학제 논문집 2007)" (2007), 민음사
- 염무웅, "김수영론(김수영의 문학 - 김수영 전집 별권)" (1983), 민음사
- 우한용, "문학 교육과정 개정의 방향 탐색", 문학교육학, (20), pp.11~42 (2006), 한국문학교육학회
- 유종호, "총체적 삶의 위기, 인문학적 처방은 가능한가 - 세계화·신보수주의 시대의 교육과 인문학", 비평, (12) (2004), 생각의 나무
- 정정호, "소설의 ‘힘’에 관한 실천적 사유 또는 21세기를 위한 새로운 문학 옹호론", 비평, (12) (2004), 생각의 나무
- 최지현, "문학교사는 존재하는가 -문학교사에 대한 문학교육학 교수, 예비교사, 그리고 국어교사의 이해", 문학교육학, (21), pp.41~76 (2006), 한국문학교육학회
- 구인환, "문학교육론" (1998), 삼지원
- 최현섭, "국어교육학개론" (2005), 삼지원
- Joseph Childers, "현대 문학·문화 비평 용어사전" (1999), 문학동네
- T. W. Adorno, "미학이론", pp.57~ (1984), 문학과지성사
