본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어의 상적 유형강제 연구

Study on the Aspectual Type Coercion in Chinese

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study analyzed the mismatches between lexical aspect and aspect marker in Mandarin Chinese. In general, there are strong tendencies in the combination between the combination of the lexical aspect of verbs and grammatical aspect markers, and the semantic mismatch between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect results in an ungrammatical sentence. For example, individual-level state verbs and achievement verbs are not compatible with progressives. However, in some cases, inspite of their aspectual mismatch, individual-level state verbs occur in progressives, and it is acceptable. These mismatches are usually called ‘situation type shift’. This article explained how the mismatches can be acceptable by aspectual type coercion. Coercion is an implicit operation that triggers type shift and reinterpretation. Coercion resolves the semantic conflict between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect, and shift the input value(i.e. aspectual feature value) of lexical aspect. In this article, we investigated the semantic mismatches between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect of Mandarin Chinese, and analyzed their shifted input value. Aspectual mismatches and reinterpretations are highly dependent on the context at first, but some of them have developed into new constructions.

Abstract

This study analyzed the mismatches between lexical aspect and aspect marker in Mandarin Chinese. In general, there are strong tendencies in the combination between the combination of the lexical aspect of verbs and grammatical aspect markers, and the semantic mismatch between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect results in an ungrammatical sentence. For example, individual-level state verbs and achievement verbs are not compatible with progressives. However, in some cases, inspite of their aspectual mismatch, individual-level state verbs occur in progressives, and it is acceptable. These mismatches are usually called ‘situation type shift’. This article explained how the mismatches can be acceptable by aspectual type coercion. Coercion is an implicit operation that triggers type shift and reinterpretation. Coercion resolves the semantic conflict between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect, and shift the input value(i.e. aspectual feature value) of lexical aspect. In this article, we investigated the semantic mismatches between lexical aspect and grammatical aspect of Mandarin Chinese, and analyzed their shifted input value. Aspectual mismatches and reinterpretations are highly dependent on the context at first, but some of them have developed into new constructions.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 임서현, "생성어휘부 이론의 유형강제 현상 연구에 대한 재고와 우선순위 당연논리 기반의 새로운 접근", 언어와 정보, 21(2), pp.159~187 (2017), 한국언어정보학회
  2. 정지수, "구문과 지속상 표지 ‘着’ - 관점상 선택과 구문의 의미, 통사 특징을 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (75), pp.65~91 (2016), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  3. 정지수, "개체성 상태동사와 지속상 표지 ‘着’의 결합현상 연구 ― ‘有着’를 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (82), pp.43~70 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  4. 정지수, "중국어 성취동사 진행상 — 영어와의 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (96), pp.37~72 (2019), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  5. 조경환, "중국어의 종결성과 척도성", 중국어문학논집, (71), pp.87~105 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
  6. 정지수, "中國語言文字論稿", pp.95~115 (2007), 올린책상
  7. de Swart, Henriëtte, "aspect shift and coercion", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16(2), pp.347~385 (1998)
  8. Goldberg, Adele E., "구문문법" (2004), 한국문화사
  9. Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions at Work : the Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  10. Huang, C.-T. James, "The Syntax of Chinese" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  11. Huang, Chu-Ren, "Classifiers and Semantic Type Coercion: Motivating a New Classification of Classifiers", Language Information and Computation(PACLIC 11), 1 (1996)
  12. Lin, Jimmy, "Are Degree Achievements Really Achievements?", Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-9) (2004)
  13. Michaelis, LAURA A., "Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion", Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), pp.1~67 (2004)
  14. Michaelis, LAURA A., "Stative by construction", Linguistics, 49(62011), pp.1359~1399 (2011)
  15. Pustejovsky, James, "The generative lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
  16. James Pustejovsky, "Type Theory and Lexical Decomposition", Journal of Cognitive Science, 7(1), pp.39~76 (2006), 인지과학연구소
  17. Pustejovsky, James, "Coercion in a general theory of argument selection", Linguistics, 140(6), pp.1401~1431 (2011)
  18. Smith, C., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1997), Kluwer Academic
  19. Wendan Li, "Aspectual coercion : Interpretations of V-le in Mandarin Chinese", International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 4(1), pp.22~61 (2017)
  20. Xiao, Richard, "Aspect in Mandarin Chinese" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  21. Xu, Hongzhi, "Primitives of Events and the Semantic Representation", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon (GL2013), pp.54~61 (2013)
  22. Yang, Suying, "The Aspectual System of Chinese", Ph.D., pp.1995
  23. Vlach, Frank, "The semantic of the Progressive", Synthese, 54, pp.129~152 (1981)
  24. 孟 琮, "汉语动词用法词典" (1999), 商务印书馆
  25. 孙英杰, "现代汉语体系统研究" (2007), 黑龙江人民出版社
  26. 王 晶, "从构式角度分析英汉语中的体压制现象", 南昌教育学院学报 外语研究, 26(10) (2011)
  27. 王 晶, "英汉语“非完整体”压制的构式分析", 太原城市职业技术学院学报, (二) (2018)
  28. 王 力, "中国语法理论" (1945), 中华书局
  29. 王小莘, "“程度副词+名词”是当前汉语运用中值得注意的一种现象", 语言文字应用, (二) (1998)
  30. 王 媛, "现代汉语动结式的进行体", 语言科学, 10(1) (2011)
  31. 邢福义, "“很淑女”之类说法语言文化背景的思考", 语言研究, (二) (1997)
  32. 杨素英, "语法研究和探索(九)", pp.81~105 (2000), 商务印书馆
  33. 杨素英, "动词情状分类及分类中的问题", 语言学论丛, 39, pp.478~505 (2009), 商务印书馆
  34. 袁 野, "汉语中的时体压制", 外国语文(双月刊), (二) (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)