본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

論對漢語時間副詞起制約作用的隱性語義範疇― 以“從此”等八個現代漢語時間副詞爲例

On the Covert Semantic Category Restricting Chinese Temporal Adverbs ― In the Case of Eight Modern Chinese Temporal Adverbs “Congci”, etc.

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In the paper, eight temporal adverbs “congci”(從此), “congjin”(從今), “conglai”(從來), “shizhong”(始終), “xianglai”(向來), “yixiang”(一向), “yizhi”(一直) and “yongyuan”(永遠) have been examined, so as to explore the covert semantic categories that play a restrictive role hidden behind modern Chinese temporal adverbs. In order to reduce the complexity of the discussion and make it easier to clarify the problem, only three covert generic semantic categories are discussed in the paper, which are tense category, temporal quantity category and positive / negative category. The tense category is composed of absolute past tense, absolute future tense, whole temporal domain, relative past tense and other specific temporal categories. The temporal quantity category is composed of background specific temporal quantity category and measuring specific temporal quantity category. The positive/negative category consists of positive restricted specific category and negative restricted specific category. Through investigations, the basic phenomena that eight temporal adverbs such as “congci”(從此) are how restricted by above three semantic categories are sorted out in the paper. For example, “congjin”(從今) can express absolute future tense, but can not express absolute past tense; “yixiang”(一向) can express absolute past tense, but can not express absolute future tense; “yizhi”(一直) can express absolute past tense, absolute future tense and whole temporal domain. “Xianglai”(向來) can express background temporal quantity, but can not express measuring temporal quantity; whereas “congci”(從此) can express both background temporal quantity and measuring temporal quantity. Positive category has an strong restrictive effect on “shizhong”(始終), while negative category has an strong restrictive effect on “conglai”(從來). In a word, the study of this paper confirms that it does exist some covert semantic categories, which hide behind the words, but restrict the meaning of words. These categories have a great restrictive effect, even though the quantity of which is limited, and the functions of which are strong or weak. If these covert semantic categories can be understood comprehensively and profoundly, the law of the structure of word meaning will be got a clearer understanding also.

Abstract

In the paper, eight temporal adverbs “congci”(從此), “congjin”(從今), “conglai”(從來), “shizhong”(始終), “xianglai”(向來), “yixiang”(一向), “yizhi”(一直) and “yongyuan”(永遠) have been examined, so as to explore the covert semantic categories that play a restrictive role hidden behind modern Chinese temporal adverbs. In order to reduce the complexity of the discussion and make it easier to clarify the problem, only three covert generic semantic categories are discussed in the paper, which are tense category, temporal quantity category and positive / negative category. The tense category is composed of absolute past tense, absolute future tense, whole temporal domain, relative past tense and other specific temporal categories. The temporal quantity category is composed of background specific temporal quantity category and measuring specific temporal quantity category. The positive/negative category consists of positive restricted specific category and negative restricted specific category. Through investigations, the basic phenomena that eight temporal adverbs such as “congci”(從此) are how restricted by above three semantic categories are sorted out in the paper. For example, “congjin”(從今) can express absolute future tense, but can not express absolute past tense; “yixiang”(一向) can express absolute past tense, but can not express absolute future tense; “yizhi”(一直) can express absolute past tense, absolute future tense and whole temporal domain. “Xianglai”(向來) can express background temporal quantity, but can not express measuring temporal quantity; whereas “congci”(從此) can express both background temporal quantity and measuring temporal quantity. Positive category has an strong restrictive effect on “shizhong”(始終), while negative category has an strong restrictive effect on “conglai”(從來). In a word, the study of this paper confirms that it does exist some covert semantic categories, which hide behind the words, but restrict the meaning of words. These categories have a great restrictive effect, even though the quantity of which is limited, and the functions of which are strong or weak. If these covert semantic categories can be understood comprehensively and profoundly, the law of the structure of word meaning will be got a clearer understanding also.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 曹爽, "时间副词"从来"与"向来"的比较研究——兼论对外汉语教学", 焦作师范高等专科学校学报, (1), pp.31~33 (2009)
  2. 常钥, "基于语料库时间副词"一直"和"从来"的比较分析", 山西大同大学学报(社会科学版), (3), pp.82~87 (2020)
  3. 邓小宁, ""一直"与"一向"的多角度分析", 汉语学习, (6), pp.58~62 (2002)
  4. 霍凯特, "现代语言学教程" (2002), 北京大学出版社
  5. 金前文, "留学生汉语副词"从来"的使用偏误——基于HSK动态作文语料库的分析", 湖北工业大学学报, (3), pp.98~99 (2014)
  6. 高磊, ""从来""始终""永远"的语法意义辨析", 语言文字应用, (S2), pp.70~72 (2006)
  7. 葛文杰, ""从来"句的语义语用分析", 江西教育学院学报(社会科学), (4), pp.51~54 (2004)
  8. 雷曦, "副词"一直"与"从来"辨析", 文学教育, (A10), pp.136~138 (2009)
  9. 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2004), 商务印书馆
  10. 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
  11. 任海波, "“一直”与“从来”的比较分析", 广播电视大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (1), pp.68~72 (2005)
  12. 唐善生, "副词"从来"的语义及其句法特征", 汉语学习, (4), pp.21~28 (2011)
  13. 唐为群, ""从来"和"从来"句", 语言研究, (3), pp.82~85 (2007)
  14. 薛巧慧, ""从来"与"始终"辨析", 语文学刊, (9), pp.155~165 (2008)
  15. 于超, "时间副词"永远"的时态逻辑刻画", 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), (5), pp.11~15 (2015)
  16. 张娟, ""一向""始终""一直"的语义和用法比较", 科教导刊(中旬刊), (9), pp.211~212 (2010)
  17. 张谊生, "现代汉语副词探索" (2004), 学林出版社
  18. 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2012), 商务印书馆
  19. 钟虹, ""从来"和"历来"的共性表现与语值分工", 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, (5), pp.117~122 (2016)
  20. 邹海清, ""一向"与"一直"的功能差异", 海外华文教育, (4), pp.14~18 (2009)
  21. 左思民, "语言规律探索集", pp.174~186 (2014), 世界图书出版公司北京公司
  22. Comrie B., "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)