동사 ‘殺’의 상적 자질에 관한 소고
A Study on the Aspectual Feature of Chinese Verb ‘sha (殺)’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Accomplishment verbs have unique aspectual feature than other verbs, i.e. state verbs, activity verbs, and achievements verb are generally determined by their own verb aspectual qualities, but accomplishment verbs must also consider object noun phrase, because it serve as a termination point or telic. In this paper, we examined the aspectual feature of the Chinese verb ‘sha (殺)’. Since ‘sha’ and ‘chi (吃)’ in SVO sentence do not necessarily involve the result, so there is no problem even if the additional clause ‘keshimei VR (可是没VR)’ follows it. However, in the case of ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’ is a little bit different, because the Ba–construction (把字句) itself requires the result element. Thus, ‘le3 (了₁)’ after ‘chi (吃)’ showed a clear result in ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’, the result of implication of ‘sha implied in ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’ isn’t that much clear. The reason is ‘sha (殺)’ was used as achievement verb in ancient times, and it changed into accomplishment verb since the modern period. In short, ‘sha (殺)’ is still a typical accomplishment verb, even though it implies results or completion, but can not express result meanings independently. And further research is needed on the verb in the future in order to understand more clearly the Chinese aspect system.
Abstract
Accomplishment verbs have unique aspectual feature than other verbs, i.e. state verbs, activity verbs, and achievements verb are generally determined by their own verb aspectual qualities, but accomplishment verbs must also consider object noun phrase, because it serve as a termination point or telic. In this paper, we examined the aspectual feature of the Chinese verb ‘sha (殺)’. Since ‘sha’ and ‘chi (吃)’ in SVO sentence do not necessarily involve the result, so there is no problem even if the additional clause ‘keshimei VR (可是没VR)’ follows it. However, in the case of ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’ is a little bit different, because the Ba–construction (把字句) itself requires the result element. Thus, ‘le3 (了₁)’ after ‘chi (吃)’ showed a clear result in ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’, the result of implication of ‘sha implied in ‘Ba-NPV-le (把-NPV-了)’ isn’t that much clear. The reason is ‘sha (殺)’ was used as achievement verb in ancient times, and it changed into accomplishment verb since the modern period. In short, ‘sha (殺)’ is still a typical accomplishment verb, even though it implies results or completion, but can not express result meanings independently. And further research is needed on the verb in the future in order to understand more clearly the Chinese aspect system.
참고문헌 (27)
- 이은수, "중국어 상황상과 了, 부정사", 중국어문논역총간, (23), pp.295~315 (2008), 중국어문논역학회
- 조경환, "중국어의 상 : 안과 밖" (2015), 도서출판 역락
- 조경환, "중국어의 완수 동사", 중국어문논총, (70), pp.81~102 (2015), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 조경환, "중국어 문법의 토대" (2018), 한국문화사
- 鄧守信, "汉语語法論文集", pp.261~268 (2005), 文鶴出版有限公司
- 李佐豐, "上古語法硏究", pp.86~101 (1999), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 帅志嵩, "中古汉语‘完成’語義範疇硏究" (2014), 商務印書館
- 帅志嵩, "从汉语动词的阶段性看‘了₁’的語義功能", 世界汉语敎學, 30, pp.197~212 (2016)
- 楊素英, "漢語當代動貌理論", 語法硏究和探索, 9, pp.81~105 (2000)
- Chief, Liancheng, "Scalarity and Incomplete Event Description in Mandarin Chinese", Doctoral, pp.2007
- Kingkarn Thepkanjanaa, "Syntactic and Semantic Discrepancies among the Verbs for ‘kill’ in English, Chinese and Thai", PACLIC 24 Proceedings, pp.291~300 (2010)
- Koenig, "Scalarity and state-changes in Mandarin", Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 7, pp.241~262 (2008)
- Langacker, Ronald, "Investigations in Cognitive Grammar" (2009), Mouton de Gruyter
- Li XuPing, "Numeral Classifiers in Chinese" (2013), De Gruyter Mouton
- Liu, Feng-Hsi, "An aspectual analysis of BA", Journal of East-Asian Linguistics, 6, pp.51~99 (1997)
- Liu, Feng-Hsi, "Definite NPs and telicity in Chinese", Snippets, 7, pp.13~15 (2003)
- Soh Hooi Ling, "Perspectives on Aspect", pp.199~216 (2005), Springer
- Smith Carlota, "The Parameter of Aspect", pp.343~390 (1991), Klewer Academic Publishers
- Sybesma Rint, "The Mandarin VP" (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Tai, "Verbs and Times : Vendler’s Four Categories", Chicago Linguistic Society, 28, pp.289~297 (1984)
- Tenny, Carol, "Aspectual Roles and The Syntax-Semantics Interface" (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- "The Ba constructions in Mandarin Chinese" (2006)[URL]
- Wang, Zhijun, "Situation Type, Context Coercion And The Meaning Of The Chinese Aspect Marker Le", Doctoral, pp.2007
- Xiao, Zhong-Hua, "Aspect in Mandarin Chinese" (2004), John Benjamin publinshing co
- Yang, Suying, "The Aspectual System of Chinese", Doctoral, pp.1995
- Yang, Suying, "The parameter of temporal endpoint and the basic function of –le", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 20, pp.383~415 (2011)
- Yong, Shin, "The Grammatical functions of verb complement in Mandarin Chinese", Linguistics, 35, pp.1~24 (1997)