한자어 부정 접두사의 결합 양상
The Aspect of Derivation of Chinese Negative Prefix
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this thesis are to observe morphologic, semantic, syntactic distribution of derived forms of Chinese negative prefix ‘mu(無), bul/bu(不), mi (未), and bi(非)’. This research are explained relative productivity and tendencies of blocking in a quantitative. And we are described meaning and usage of derived forms in a context. The results examined the relation between a property of meaning, that is,'negation' and blocking. These results also clarified the interrelation between frequency of derived forms and blocking. Some of the words doesn't combine exclusively. Therefore this study have worked not only morphologic aspect but semantic,syntactic distribution of this some of the words. As a result, it was found that the blocking is a competition between prefixes which have similar meaning. In some cases we don't have typical blocking. This is explained that the prefixes with the lowest productivity don't have blocking and these derived forms have a difference of meaning and usage of in the context.
Abstract
The purposes of this thesis are to observe morphologic, semantic, syntactic distribution of derived forms of Chinese negative prefix ‘mu(無), bul/bu(不), mi (未), and bi(非)’. This research are explained relative productivity and tendencies of blocking in a quantitative. And we are described meaning and usage of derived forms in a context. The results examined the relation between a property of meaning, that is,'negation' and blocking. These results also clarified the interrelation between frequency of derived forms and blocking. Some of the words doesn't combine exclusively. Therefore this study have worked not only morphologic aspect but semantic,syntactic distribution of this some of the words. As a result, it was found that the blocking is a competition between prefixes which have similar meaning. In some cases we don't have typical blocking. This is explained that the prefixes with the lowest productivity don't have blocking and these derived forms have a difference of meaning and usage of in the context.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
- 김규철, "한자어 단어형성에 대하여", 국어학, 29, pp.9~ (1997)
- 김규철, "단어형성과 도상성에 대한 연구" (2005), 박이정
- 김창섭, "형용사 파생 접미사들의 기능과 의미, In 형태론" (1984), 태학사
- 노명희, "한자어의 어휘형태론적 특성에 관한 연구", 국어연구, 95 (1990), 국어연구회
- 노명희, "현대국어 한자어 연구" (2005), 태학사
- 徐炳國, "現代國語의 語構成 硏究", 박사, pp.1975
- 서정수, "동사 ‘-하’의 문법" (1975), 형설출판사
- 송기중, "현대국어 한자어의 구조", 한국어문, 1 (1992), 한국정신문화연구원
- 송철의, "국어의 파생어형성 연구" (1992), 태학사
- 시정곤, "국어 형태론에서의 ‘생산성’ 문제에 대한 연구", 형태론, 8(2), pp.257~276 (2006), 형태론
- 심재기, "한자어의 구조와 그 조어력", 국어생활, (8) (1987), 국어연구회
- 이광호, "국어 파생 접사의 생산성에 대한 계량적 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 이광호, "파생어와 그 의미의 도출-2개 이상의 갈래뜻을 가진 파생어를 중심으로-", 형태론, 10(1), pp.43~64 (2008), 형태론
- 전상범, "형태론 개론" (2006), 한국문화사
- 鄭旼泳, "국어 한자어의 단어 형성 연구", 박사, pp.1994
- 조현숙, "부정접두어 ’無, 不, 未, 非‘의 성격과 용법", 관악어문연구, 14, pp.231~252 (1989), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 채현식, "유추에 의한 복합명사 형성 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 최형용, "국어 단어의 형태와 통사" (2003), 태학사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘 문화사
- Aronoff, M., "Word formation in generative grammar" (1976), MIT Press
- Kiparsky, P., "Lexical morphology and phonology, In Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.3~9 (1982), Hanshin Publishing Co.
- Plag, I., "Word-formation in english" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Rainer, F., "Towards a theory of blocking: Italian and German quality nouns, In Yearbook of Morphology 1988", pp.155~185 (1988), Foris