朝鮮時代 封典을 위한 印章과 誥命의 歷史的 意味
Historical meaning of Gomyong(誥命) and Seal(印章) for the Bongjeon(封典) during Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Despite the high historical significance of the Joseon's seal(印章) and Bongjeon(封典), there are few concrete studies to date. In this regard, this study attempted a practical approach to the historical meaning of seal and Bongjeon in the Joseon. Since many Kings of the Joseon received the Gomyong and Seal and the completion of Bongjeon, they were accompanied by very intense diplomatic activities. Nevertheless, this study was conducted because a summary of seal and Bongjeon was needed. Joseon had to complete the Bongjeon by receiving Gomyong(誥命) and Seal from China (Ming and Qing) in order to establish external stability and internal rule of order. Bongjeon is the official king of the Joseon externally, the recognition of Joseon in the international order centered in China, and means that the relationship between the two countries is normalized. Bongjeon means that the king of Joseon is officially rewarded externally and is recognized by Joseon in an international order centered on China, and normalizes diplomatic relations between Joseon and China. In addition, Joseon was granted royal authority from China internally to secure the legitimacy of government. In the Joseon Dynasty, Bongjeon was achieved by receiving Gomyong and Seal. Gomyong is a document proving the status of the king, and Seal is a seal that symbolizes the authority of the king. Immediately after its founding, Joseon informed the Ming of its founding and requested Gomyong and Seal. However, Joseon did not complete Bongjeon from the TaeJo(太祖) period to the Jeongjong(定宗) period because Joseon and the Ming conflicted over the influence of liaodong(遼東) and Jurchen(女眞). Joseon achieved Bongjeon with the Gomyong and Seal as an opportunity for the Ming during the Taejong(太宗) period. The seals of the Joseon Dynasty were ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’ received from the Ming, ‘the seal of the State(國璽)’ used for state rule, and ‘the official seal(官印)’ required for administration. Among these, ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’ is called ‘a treasure of great value(大寶)’, symbolizes the king of Joseon internally and externally, and was used in major ruling and diplomatic documents. In addition to ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’, Joseon created and used various types of ‘the seal of the State(國璽)’ for government. The Joseon implemented foreign policy to receive the Gomyong and Seal, which was essential for national rule and security. oseon actively developed diplomatic activities to achieve Bongjeon in accordance with changes in international order and domestic situation. Above all, Bongjeon was relatively easily achieved when the succession of the king's throne was normal, but Bongjeon was very difficult if he succeeded to the throne rather than restoration(反正) or not the eldest son. In the Joseon, there were many diplomatic cases involving Bongjeon, and Joseon regarded Bongjeon as the largest diplomatic case in China. The Joseon undertook diplomatic activities with all its power to obtain Gomyong and Seal from China. The Joseon regarded diplomatic documents in this process and was careful about the production, transmission, reception and storage of diplomatic documents. As the largest diplomatic documentary of the Joseon, “Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考)” is the best source of information on Joseon's foreign relations. “Tongmunhwigo” established Bongjeon as the first major diplomatic issue in the systematic categorization of diplomatic cases.
Abstract
Despite the high historical significance of the Joseon's seal(印章) and Bongjeon(封典), there are few concrete studies to date. In this regard, this study attempted a practical approach to the historical meaning of seal and Bongjeon in the Joseon. Since many Kings of the Joseon received the Gomyong and Seal and the completion of Bongjeon, they were accompanied by very intense diplomatic activities. Nevertheless, this study was conducted because a summary of seal and Bongjeon was needed. Joseon had to complete the Bongjeon by receiving Gomyong(誥命) and Seal from China (Ming and Qing) in order to establish external stability and internal rule of order. Bongjeon is the official king of the Joseon externally, the recognition of Joseon in the international order centered in China, and means that the relationship between the two countries is normalized. Bongjeon means that the king of Joseon is officially rewarded externally and is recognized by Joseon in an international order centered on China, and normalizes diplomatic relations between Joseon and China. In addition, Joseon was granted royal authority from China internally to secure the legitimacy of government. In the Joseon Dynasty, Bongjeon was achieved by receiving Gomyong and Seal. Gomyong is a document proving the status of the king, and Seal is a seal that symbolizes the authority of the king. Immediately after its founding, Joseon informed the Ming of its founding and requested Gomyong and Seal. However, Joseon did not complete Bongjeon from the TaeJo(太祖) period to the Jeongjong(定宗) period because Joseon and the Ming conflicted over the influence of liaodong(遼東) and Jurchen(女眞). Joseon achieved Bongjeon with the Gomyong and Seal as an opportunity for the Ming during the Taejong(太宗) period. The seals of the Joseon Dynasty were ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’ received from the Ming, ‘the seal of the State(國璽)’ used for state rule, and ‘the official seal(官印)’ required for administration. Among these, ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’ is called ‘a treasure of great value(大寶)’, symbolizes the king of Joseon internally and externally, and was used in major ruling and diplomatic documents. In addition to ‘the seal of the King of Joseon(朝鮮國王之印)’, Joseon created and used various types of ‘the seal of the State(國璽)’ for government. The Joseon implemented foreign policy to receive the Gomyong and Seal, which was essential for national rule and security. oseon actively developed diplomatic activities to achieve Bongjeon in accordance with changes in international order and domestic situation. Above all, Bongjeon was relatively easily achieved when the succession of the king's throne was normal, but Bongjeon was very difficult if he succeeded to the throne rather than restoration(反正) or not the eldest son. In the Joseon, there were many diplomatic cases involving Bongjeon, and Joseon regarded Bongjeon as the largest diplomatic case in China. The Joseon undertook diplomatic activities with all its power to obtain Gomyong and Seal from China. The Joseon regarded diplomatic documents in this process and was careful about the production, transmission, reception and storage of diplomatic documents. As the largest diplomatic documentary of the Joseon, “Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考)” is the best source of information on Joseon's foreign relations. “Tongmunhwigo” established Bongjeon as the first major diplomatic issue in the systematic categorization of diplomatic cases.
참고문헌 (65)
- "고려사", ~
- "조선태조실록", ~
- "조선정종실록", ~
- "조선세종실록", ~
- "조선선조실록", ~
- "조선숙종실록", ~
- "列聖誌狀通紀", ~
- "비변사등록", ~
- "與猶堂全書", ~
- "대전통편", ~
- "林下筆記", ~
- "弘齋全書", ~
- "頒赦勅遠接使別人情 (奎 1312)", ~
- "동문휘고", ~
- "명태조실록", ~
- "명사", ~
- "대명률", ~
- "讀史記十表", ~
- "皇明詔令", ~
- "光緖淸會典事例", ~
- "만력회전", ~
- "건륭회전", ~
- 박원호, "명초조선관계사연구" (2002), 일조각
- 이영춘, "조선후기 왕위계승 연구" (1998), 집문당
- 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (2001), 역사비평사
- 계승범, "세자 광해군 : 용상을 향한 멀고도 험한 길", 한국인물사연구, (20), pp.211~246 (2013), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 김경록, "『同文彙考』를 통한 조선후기 외교사안 연구 ― 原編 ‘封典’ 事案을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (32), pp.69~103 (2009), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김경록, "明代 公文制度와 行移體系", 명청사연구, (26), pp.123~168 (2006), 명청사학회
- 김경록, "明代 驛傳制度와 韓中關係에서 符驗의 意味 ― 홍무연간을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (49), pp.1~42 (2018), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김경록, "麗末鮮初 洪武帝의 高麗․朝鮮 認識과 外交關係", 명청사연구, (35), pp.1~33 (2011), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김경록, "조선시대 대중국 외교문서의 접수?보존체계", 한국사연구, (136), pp.133~177 (2007), 한국사연구회
- 김경록, "조선의 對淸關係 認識과 外交體系 ― 조선후기 외교문서의 정리를 중심으로 ―", 이화사학연구, (37), pp.139~181 (2008), 이화사학연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "조선초기 종계변무의 전개양상과 대명관계", 국사관논총, (108) (2006)
- 김경록, "朝鮮後期 ?同文彙考?의 編纂過程과 性格", 조선시대사학보, (32), pp.185~226 (2005), 조선시대사학회
- 김경록, "朝鮮後期 事大文書의 종류와 성격", 한국문화, (35), pp.181~234 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- 김경록, "中宗反正이후 承襲外交와 朝明關係", 한국문화, (40), pp.211~247 (2007), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 김경록, "洪武年間 明의 封典 整備와 朝·明關係", 중국사연구, (106), pp.59~94 (2017), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 김경록, "홍무연간(洪武年間) 명(明)의 요동경략(遼東經略)과 조․명(朝明)관계", 군사, (102), pp.187~226 (2017), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "홍무제의 대외인식과 조공제도의 정비", 명청사연구, (37), pp.1~31 (2012), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김성규, "여‧금의 국교 수립과 ‘誓表’ 문제", 한국사연구, (173), pp.127~160 (2016), 한국사연구회
- 서은혜, "고려·조선의 국제관계에서 역서가 가지는 의미와 그 변화", 역사비평, (121), pp.99~121 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
- 성인근, "조선시대와 대한제국기 國璽의 변화상", 역사와 실학, (36), pp.85~112 (2008), 역사실학회
- 손성욱, "王世子 冊封으로 본 淸・朝 관계(康熙 35년∼乾隆 2년)", 동양사학연구, (146), pp.193~230 (2019), 동양사학회
- 안기혁, "여말선초 대중국관계와 국왕시호(國王諡號)", 역사와 현실, (104), pp.229~262 (2017), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
- 오일환, "17紀初 朝鮮政變與明廷對朝鮮認識-仁祖 封典을 中心으로-", 東洋學硏究, 4 (1998)
- 윤승희, "고려 말 명 사신 영접의례의 성립- 迎大明賜勞使儀와 迎大明無詔勅使儀를 중심으로-", 한국중세사연구, (55), pp.571~599 (2018), 한국중세사학회[DOI]
- 윤승희, "조선 초기 조선국왕 책봉의례의 정비와 그 특징", 조선시대사학보, (85), pp.83~112 (2018), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
- 이현진, "명․청의 賜祭․賜諡에 대한 조선의 대응", 조선시대사학보, (63), pp.131~163 (2012), 조선시대사학회
- 장을연, "淸代 조선왕실 冊封誥命과 조선 敎命의 형태 비교연구", 藏書閣, (24), pp.135~168 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 정동훈, "몽골제국의 붕괴와 고려-명의 유산 상속분쟁", 역사비평, (121), pp.77~98 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
- 정동훈, "冊과 誥命 - 고려시대 국왕 책봉문서", 사학연구, (126), pp.149~202 (2017), 한국사학회
- 최종석, "13~15세기 천하질서하에서 고려와 조선의 국가 정체성", 역사비평, (121), pp.10~44 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
- 최종석, "조선 건국의 대외적 정당화 작업과 중화 보편의 추구", 한국사연구, (180), pp.79~112 (2018), 한국사연구회
- 최종석, "조선초기 迎詔禮 운영과『蕃國儀注』", 역사와 담론, (86), pp.139~177 (2018), 호서사학회
- 罗福颐, "古玺印概论" (1981), 文物出版社
- 罗福颐, "汉印文字微" (1978), 文物出版社
- 孫書磊, "明代公文制度述略", 南京工業大學學報(社會科學版), 2005(2) (2005)
- 王廷恰, "中国古代印章史" (2006), 上海人民出版社
- 王廷洽, "中國古代印章史" (2006), 上海人民出版社
- 张金梁, "明代朝廷玺印研究", 中國歷史文物, 2008(5) (2008)
- 傳世文化, "古玩圖鑒(璽印古錢篇)" (2007), 文物出版社
- 叶其峰, "古玺印及古玺印鉴定" (1997), 文物出版社
- 叶其峰, "古玺印通论" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 末松保和, "靑丘史草 1" (1969), 笠井出版印刷社
- 片岡一忠, "中国官印制度研究" (2008), 東方書店
