『同文彙考』를 통한 조선후기 외교사안 연구 ― 原編 ‘封典’ 事案을 중심으로 ―
The Study of diplomatic relations item through Tongmunhwigo(『同文彙考』) during the Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The relation of Joseon and Cnina was prescribed and formed the mutual relation in the tributary system(조공체제) by the international system of the formal investiture(책봉) and tributary(조공). The diplomacy activity was carried out in the international order of the tributary system than the format to the direction to pursue the nation profit. Joseon and China tied the diplomacy relation through the diplomacy system of the sahaeng(사행) and envoy reception(사신접대). Joseon arranged the experience systematicly if various diplomacy affair happened active confrontation for. The experience was grasped systematicly through the arranging of the diplomacy document. The arranging method of the diplomacy document was the recognition about China diplomacy relation of Joseon and was the confrontation strategy. The preservation was a form of registration, since it was impossible that all documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as [imun(吏文)] in the early of Joseon, [Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄=槐院謄錄)] in the 15-16th century, and [Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考)] in the late of Joseon. While these documents were the original copy, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs. [Tongmunhwigo] was compiled on the basis to believed about the affair to happen at the future. If only political motives are taken into account, foreign relations boil down to doing what is most profitable for one’s own country. These items which was gathered at [Tongmunhwigo] was as follows. ‘Bongjun(封典)’, ‘Aelye(哀禮)’, ‘Jinha(進賀)’, ‘Jinwy(陳慰-進香)’, ‘Munan(問安)’, ‘Jŏlsa(節使-歲幣-方物)’, ‘Jinju(陳奏-辨誣-討逆)’, ‘Pyojeonsik(表箋式)’, ‘Chunggu(請求)’, ‘Sugjae(錫𧶘)’, ‘Gyeonpye(蠲弊)’, ‘Chikyou(飭諭)’, ‘Yeokseo(曆書)’, ‘Irwolsik(日月食)’, ‘Gyoyeok(交易)’, ‘Ganggye(疆界)’, ‘Beomwol(犯越)’, ‘Beomgeum(犯禁)’, ‘Swaewhan(刷還)’, ‘Pyomin(漂民)’, ‘Chujing(推徵)’, ‘Gunmu(軍務)’, ‘Buhyur(賻恤)’, ‘Waejeong(倭情)’, ‘Jabryeng(雜令)’ etc.. [Tongmunhwigo] makes the criteria so that the diplomacy document is regular and organizes the item. Rather detailly we can distinguish to a ‘necessary diplomacy class’ and ‘practical diplomacy class’. ‘Necessary diplomacy class’ is regular and is containing the personality to be inside political and has same kind with ‘Bongjun’, ‘Aelye’, ‘Jinha’ etc. ‘Practical diplomacy class’ is to arrange the diplomacy affair to happen to the irregularity in the nation relation and has same kind with ‘Jinju’, ‘Chunggu’, ‘Ganggye’ etc. Joseon was active and formed China relation to systematic analysis.
Abstract
The relation of Joseon and Cnina was prescribed and formed the mutual relation in the tributary system(조공체제) by the international system of the formal investiture(책봉) and tributary(조공). The diplomacy activity was carried out in the international order of the tributary system than the format to the direction to pursue the nation profit. Joseon and China tied the diplomacy relation through the diplomacy system of the sahaeng(사행) and envoy reception(사신접대). Joseon arranged the experience systematicly if various diplomacy affair happened active confrontation for. The experience was grasped systematicly through the arranging of the diplomacy document. The arranging method of the diplomacy document was the recognition about China diplomacy relation of Joseon and was the confrontation strategy. The preservation was a form of registration, since it was impossible that all documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as [imun(吏文)] in the early of Joseon, [Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄=槐院謄錄)] in the 15-16th century, and [Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考)] in the late of Joseon. While these documents were the original copy, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs. [Tongmunhwigo] was compiled on the basis to believed about the affair to happen at the future. If only political motives are taken into account, foreign relations boil down to doing what is most profitable for one’s own country. These items which was gathered at [Tongmunhwigo] was as follows. ‘Bongjun(封典)’, ‘Aelye(哀禮)’, ‘Jinha(進賀)’, ‘Jinwy(陳慰-進香)’, ‘Munan(問安)’, ‘Jŏlsa(節使-歲幣-方物)’, ‘Jinju(陳奏-辨誣-討逆)’, ‘Pyojeonsik(表箋式)’, ‘Chunggu(請求)’, ‘Sugjae(錫𧶘)’, ‘Gyeonpye(蠲弊)’, ‘Chikyou(飭諭)’, ‘Yeokseo(曆書)’, ‘Irwolsik(日月食)’, ‘Gyoyeok(交易)’, ‘Ganggye(疆界)’, ‘Beomwol(犯越)’, ‘Beomgeum(犯禁)’, ‘Swaewhan(刷還)’, ‘Pyomin(漂民)’, ‘Chujing(推徵)’, ‘Gunmu(軍務)’, ‘Buhyur(賻恤)’, ‘Waejeong(倭情)’, ‘Jabryeng(雜令)’ etc.. [Tongmunhwigo] makes the criteria so that the diplomacy document is regular and organizes the item. Rather detailly we can distinguish to a ‘necessary diplomacy class’ and ‘practical diplomacy class’. ‘Necessary diplomacy class’ is regular and is containing the personality to be inside political and has same kind with ‘Bongjun’, ‘Aelye’, ‘Jinha’ etc. ‘Practical diplomacy class’ is to arrange the diplomacy affair to happen to the irregularity in the nation relation and has same kind with ‘Jinju’, ‘Chunggu’, ‘Ganggye’ etc. Joseon was active and formed China relation to systematic analysis.
참고문헌 (54)
- 전해종, "韓國史料叢書第二十四 同文彙考" (1978), 국사편찬위원회
- 김경록, "조선후기 ‘동문휘고’의 편찬과정과 성격", 조선시대사학보, 32 (2005)
- "조선후기 사대문서의 종류와 성격", 한국문화, 35 (2005)
- 김경록, "조선시대 事大文書의 생산과 전달체계", 한국사연구, (134), pp.35~74 (2006), 한국사연구회
- 김경록, "조선시대 대중국 외교문서의 접수?보존체계", 한국사연구, 136(136), pp.133~177 (2007), 한국사연구회
- 김경록, "조선초기 吏文의 편찬과 對明 외교문서의 성격", 이화사학연구, (34), pp.221~255 (2007), 이화사학연구소
- 이선홍, "조선시대 대중국 외교문서 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 배우성, "국역 「同文彙考」疆界 史料" (2008), 동북아역사재단
- 동북아역사재단, "백두산정계비-자료집-" (2006), 동북아역사재단
- 부경대 역사문화연구소, "조선시대 궁중다례의 자료 해설과 역주" (2008), 민속원
- 배우성, "국역 「同文彙考」疆界 史料" (2008), 동북아역사재단
- "국역 「同文彙考」 犯越 史料 1" (2008), 동북아역사재단
- 김경록, "조선의 對淸關係 認識과 外交體系 ― 조선후기 외교문서의 정리를 중심으로 ―", 이화사학연구, (37), pp.139~181 (2008), 이화사학연구소
- "同文彙考"
- "同文彙考 卷5, 哀禮1"
- "同文彙考 卷1, 封典1"
- "同文彙考 卷33, 陳奏1"
- "倭政. 陳請築城備倭奏; 辨明倭情飭諭及一表兼謝奏"
- "同文彙考 卷4, 封典4"
- "丙申 告英宗大王昇遐奏"
- "同文彙考 卷34, 陳奏2"
- 최소자, "청과 조선", pp.22~23 (2005), 혜안
- "讀建元以來王子侯者年表"
- "明史 卷233, 列傳121", 朱維京
- "皇外考妣追封典"
- "明史 卷320, 列傳208, 外國1"
- "光緖淸會典事例 卷2", 宗人府
- "명태조실록 권160"
- "大明會典 卷6", 驗封淸吏司
- "大明會典 卷55"
- 김경록, "明代 公文制度와 行移體系", 명청사연구, (26), pp.123~168 (2006), 명청사학회
- "吏部, 驗封清吏司, 世爵"
- "代宗皇帝降封典詔"
- "代宗皇帝降封典詔"
- "列聖誌狀通紀", ~
- "비변사등록", ~
- "敍, 封典考敍"
- "조선선조실록 권84"
- 이영춘, "조선후기 왕위계승 연구", pp.12~16 (1998), 집문당
- 김경록, "조선시대 사신접대와 영접도감", 한국학보, 117 (2004)
- 김경록, "明代 公文制度와 行移體系", 명청사연구, (26), pp.123~168 (2006), 명청사학회
- "同文彙考 卷2, 封典2"
- "光緖淸會典事例 卷502"
- "청세조실록 권16"
- "인조 23년 윤6월 신사조; 임오조; 갑신조; 신묘조; 9월 을해조"
- "告仁祖大王昇遐表; 告哀奏; 請諡表; 進行狀咨"
- 김경록, "朝鮮後期 事大文書의 종류와 성격", 한국문화, (35), pp.181~234 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- "조선태종실록 권5"
- "戊辰 禮部知會淸漢篆體金印襲封時另鑄換頒咨"
- "청세조실록 권73"
- "犯越. 壬辰 遣官査審犯越人劉春立勅"
- "鑄印, 鑄造1"
- "일성록"
- "조선정조실록 권1"
