淸代 조선왕실 冊封誥命과 조선 敎命의 형태 비교연구

Abstract

This paper intended to consider the mutual relations between Gomyung form of Ming·Qing Dynasty Period and Gyomyung form of Joseon by comparing·analyzing them and tracing their institutional source. As everyone knows, many researchers of ancient classics already approved that the impact relation between Chinese civilization and institutions and Joseon’s was very close and it was same as document’s institutions. This situation is same as Gomyung’s and Gyomyung’s. But it has been mentioned till now but positive historical investigation was not active through comparison·analysis. Gomyung and Gyomyung have the common characteristic of appointment document, especially the appointment for the highest position in national system. Therefore, those documents express the authority of royal family symbolically. In other words, Gomyung and Gyomyung arrange various patterns on the silk fabric under the certain way, dislike the most documents described on the paper generally, so they have elaborate, splendid and high-qualified aspect artistically. The typical characteristics of those documents are based on the stipulated institutions. For example, it can be the Gochiksikyang(誥勅式樣) article of Myunghoijeon. This article was accepted to Qing and Joseon as it is. But, the figure reflected to actual material shows great difference. Especially, Joseon’s Gyomyung seems to accept strong points of bureaucrat appointing Gomyung and national royal family installation Gomyung in Ming and Qing widely, for weaving and drawing(繪粧). This paper intended to chase the process Gyomyung’s form was standardized in Joseon, through comparison·analysis of Gomyung/Gyomyung’s actual forms, Ming·Qing’s law books(冊文), Gomyung institution’s transition in China and records of Uigwe(儀軌), annals(實錄), works collection(文集), etc. This study can be one example of studying on books and complex quality’s documents because this study was written under the fact that Gyomyung’s typical characteristic is mixed by various qualities, not single quality.