본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선의 對淸關係 認識과 外交體系 ― 조선후기 외교문서의 정리를 중심으로 ―

The Recognition about Qing and the Diplomatic System during the Late Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The relation of Joseon and China was prescribed as the tributary system(朝貢體制), i.e., the international system of the formal investiture(冊封) and tributary(朝貢). The diplomacy activity was carried out in the international order of the tributary system than the format to the direction to pursue the nation profit. Joseon and China tied the diplomacy relation through the diplomacy system of the sahaeng(使行) and envoy reception(使臣接待). Joseon arranged the experience systematically when various diplomatic affairs happened. The experience was grasped systematically through the arranging of the diplomatic documents. The arranging method of the diplomatic documents was the recognition about China's diplomacy relation of Joseon and was the confrontation strategy. The preservation was done by the form of registration, since it was impossible that all the documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as Imun(吏文) in the early of Joseon, Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄=槐院謄錄) in the 15-16th century, and Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考) in the late Joseon period. While these documents were the original copies, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs. Tongmunhwigo was compiled on the basis that the affair would be happened in the future. If political motives are only taken into account, foreign relations boil down to doing what is most profitable for one’s own country. These items which was gathered in Tongmunhwigo was as follows. 'Bongjun(封典)', 'Aelye(哀禮)', 'Jinha(進賀)', 'Jinwy(陳慰-進香)', 'Munan(問安)', 'Jŏlsa(節使-歲幣-方物)', 'Jinju(陳奏-辨誣-討逆)', 'Pyojeonsik(表箋式)', 'Chunggu(請求)', 'Sugjae(錫賚)', 'Gyeonpye(蠲弊)', 'Chikyou(飭諭)', 'Yeokseo(曆書)', 'Irwolsik(日月食)', 'Gyoyeok(交易)', 'Ganggye(疆界)', 'Beomwol(犯越)', 'Beomgeum(犯禁)', 'Swaewhan(刷還)', 'Pyomin(漂民)', 'Chujing(推徵)', 'Gunmu(軍務)', 'Buhyur(賻恤)', 'Waejeong(倭情)', 'Jabryeng(雜令)', etc., Tongmunhwigo has the criteria for the organizing and arranging the diplomatic documents. In detail, we can distinguish 'necessary diplomacy class' between 'practical diplomacy class'. 'Necessary diplomacy class' is regular one and is containing the character of internal political affairs and is same kind of 'Bongjun', 'Aelye', and 'Jinha' etc. 'Practical diplomacy class' is arrangement of the diplomatic affairs that happened irregularly in the international relations and has same kind of 'Jinju', 'Chunggu', and 'Ganggye' etc. The three periodization is possible if it distinguishes the Joseon and China relation based on the arrangement of a diplomatic documents of Joseon. The three periodization was from king Injo to the early Sukjong period, from Sukjong to the Chŏngjo period, and from the late Chŏngjo to the opening ports period. In the first period, Joseon was classed at the tributary system when Qing became the center of that system after the Pyŏngja horan(丙子胡亂). Qing executed a strong foreign policy to make international topology about Joseon. Joseon acknowledged Qing as a big power, sadae foreign policy of ‘serving the great’ towards Qing and reserved the safety guarantee of Joseon. But hostile feeling about Qing was high and executed the expedition to conquer north policy to the domestic of Joseon. In the second period, Joseon recognized the diplomatic matters about an every kind diplomatic affairs and acknowledged the tributary system which Qing became the center and confronted systematically. Joseon executed the collection of the diplomacy information, the analysis of a foreign diplomacy situation, the decision of the diplomacy policy, the store of the diplomacy document, etc, had the system of efficient diplomacy systematically.

Abstract

The relation of Joseon and China was prescribed as the tributary system(朝貢體制), i.e., the international system of the formal investiture(冊封) and tributary(朝貢). The diplomacy activity was carried out in the international order of the tributary system than the format to the direction to pursue the nation profit. Joseon and China tied the diplomacy relation through the diplomacy system of the sahaeng(使行) and envoy reception(使臣接待). Joseon arranged the experience systematically when various diplomatic affairs happened. The experience was grasped systematically through the arranging of the diplomatic documents. The arranging method of the diplomatic documents was the recognition about China's diplomacy relation of Joseon and was the confrontation strategy. The preservation was done by the form of registration, since it was impossible that all the documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as Imun(吏文) in the early of Joseon, Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄=槐院謄錄) in the 15-16th century, and Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考) in the late Joseon period. While these documents were the original copies, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs. Tongmunhwigo was compiled on the basis that the affair would be happened in the future. If political motives are only taken into account, foreign relations boil down to doing what is most profitable for one’s own country. These items which was gathered in Tongmunhwigo was as follows. 'Bongjun(封典)', 'Aelye(哀禮)', 'Jinha(進賀)', 'Jinwy(陳慰-進香)', 'Munan(問安)', 'Jŏlsa(節使-歲幣-方物)', 'Jinju(陳奏-辨誣-討逆)', 'Pyojeonsik(表箋式)', 'Chunggu(請求)', 'Sugjae(錫賚)', 'Gyeonpye(蠲弊)', 'Chikyou(飭諭)', 'Yeokseo(曆書)', 'Irwolsik(日月食)', 'Gyoyeok(交易)', 'Ganggye(疆界)', 'Beomwol(犯越)', 'Beomgeum(犯禁)', 'Swaewhan(刷還)', 'Pyomin(漂民)', 'Chujing(推徵)', 'Gunmu(軍務)', 'Buhyur(賻恤)', 'Waejeong(倭情)', 'Jabryeng(雜令)', etc., Tongmunhwigo has the criteria for the organizing and arranging the diplomatic documents. In detail, we can distinguish 'necessary diplomacy class' between 'practical diplomacy class'. 'Necessary diplomacy class' is regular one and is containing the character of internal political affairs and is same kind of 'Bongjun', 'Aelye', and 'Jinha' etc. 'Practical diplomacy class' is arrangement of the diplomatic affairs that happened irregularly in the international relations and has same kind of 'Jinju', 'Chunggu', and 'Ganggye' etc. The three periodization is possible if it distinguishes the Joseon and China relation based on the arrangement of a diplomatic documents of Joseon. The three periodization was from king Injo to the early Sukjong period, from Sukjong to the Chŏngjo period, and from the late Chŏngjo to the opening ports period. In the first period, Joseon was classed at the tributary system when Qing became the center of that system after the Pyŏngja horan(丙子胡亂). Qing executed a strong foreign policy to make international topology about Joseon. Joseon acknowledged Qing as a big power, sadae foreign policy of ‘serving the great’ towards Qing and reserved the safety guarantee of Joseon. But hostile feeling about Qing was high and executed the expedition to conquer north policy to the domestic of Joseon. In the second period, Joseon recognized the diplomatic matters about an every kind diplomatic affairs and acknowledged the tributary system which Qing became the center and confronted systematically. Joseon executed the collection of the diplomacy information, the analysis of a foreign diplomacy situation, the decision of the diplomacy policy, the store of the diplomacy document, etc, had the system of efficient diplomacy systematically.

참고문헌 (89)

  1. "同文彙考 (奎880)", ~
  2. "同文彙考續 (奎812, 奎796, 奎1006, 奎884, 奎 795, 奎 551, 奎 883, 奎 882)", ~
  3. "槐院謄錄 (K2-3465)", ~
  4. "勅使茶禮儀 (想白古394.4-C435)", ~
  5. "勅使謄錄 (奎 12904)", ~
  6. "勅使時各項儀註謄錄 (奎 12906-1)", ~
  7. "勅使宴禮謄錄 (奎 12918)", ~
  8. "勅使儀註謄錄 (奎 12906)", ~
  9. "勅使日記 (奎12799)", ~
  10. "勅使贈給 (奎1312)", ~
  11. "燃藜室記述", ~
  12. "經國大典 (규장각 영인본)", ~
  13. "인조실록", ~
  14. "정조실록 (국사편찬위원회 영인본)", ~
  15. "大明會典 (揚州: 廣陵書社, 2007)", ~
  16. "淸太宗實錄", ~
  17. "淸世祖實錄 (이상 청실록은 新文豊出版公司 영인본)", ~
  18. "皇?開國方略 (奎중 5461)", ~
  19. "盛京通志 (北京: 東北史志 弟1部, 全國圖書館文獻縮微復制中心, 2004)", ~
  20. 김문식, "조선 왕실기록문화의 꽃 의궤" (2005), 서울:돌베개
  21. 김종원, "근세 동아시아관계사 연구" (1999), 서울:혜안
  22. 김한규, "고대중국적세계질서 연구" (1982), 서울:일조각
  23. 김한규, "한중관계사Ⅱ" (1999), 서울:아르케
  24. 김홍철, "외교제도사" (1985), 서울:민음사
  25. 이용희, "일반국제정치학(상)" (1962), 서울:박영사
  26. 전해종, "한중관계사 연구" (1970), 서울:일조각
  27. 정옥자, "조선후기 조선중화사상연구" (1998), 서울:일지사
  28. 차문섭, "조선시대군제연구" (1995), 서울:단대출판부
  29. 최소자, "청과 조선―근세 동아시아의 상호인식" (2005), 서울:혜안
  30. 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (1999), 서울:역사비평사
  31. 강석화, "1712년의 朝淸 定界와 18세기 조선의 북방경략", 진단학보, (79) (1995)
  32. 강석화, "조선후기의 북방영토의식", 한국사연구, 129(129), pp.95~115 (2005), 한국사연구회
  33. 권선홍, "조선과 중국의 책봉-조공관계, 전통시대 중국의 대외관계" (1999), 釜山外大출판부
  34. 김경록, "明代 公文制度와 行移體系", 明淸史硏究, 26 (2006)
  35. 김경록, "조선시대 대중국 외교문서의 접수·보존체계", 한국사연구, 136 (2007)
  36. 김경록, "조선시대 사대문서의 생산과 전달체계", 한국사연구, 134 (2006)
  37. 김경록, "조선시대 사신접대와 영접도감", 한국학보, 117 (2004)
  38. 김경록, "조선초기 吏文의 편찬과 對明 외교문서의 성격", 이화사학연구, 34(34), pp.221~255 (2007), 이화사학연구소
  39. 김경록, "조선후기 ‘同文彙考’의 편찬과정과 성격", 조선시대사학보, 32 (2005)
  40. 김경록, "조선후기 사대문서의 종류와 성격", 한국문화, 35 (2005)
  41. 김경록, "중종반정 이후 승습외교와 조명관계", 한국문화, 40 (2007)
  42. 김용덕, "소현세자 연구", 사학연구, 18 (1964)
  43. 김윤제, "규장각 소장 ‘통문관지’의 간행과 판본", 규장각, 29 (2006)
  44. 김종원, "통문관지의 편찬과 중간에 대하여", 역사학보, 26 (1965)
  45. 김혜자, "조선후기 북변월경문제 연구", 이대사원, 18·19 (1982)
  46. 남궁곤, "동아시아 평화체제에 관한 연구 : 조선사행록을 통해 본 18세기 조공체제", ~
  47. "공체제?, 『한국정치학회보』 33-3 (1999)", ~ (1999)
  48. 노기식, "후금시기 만주와 몽골의 연맹 관계", 명청사연구, 11 (1999)
  49. 박현모, "세도정치기(1800-1863) 조선의 대외정책 연구", 국제정치논총, 44(4) (2004)
  50. 배우성, "17·18세기 청에 대한 인식과 북방영토의식의 변화", 한국사연구, 99·100 (1997)
  51. 孫承喆, "朝鮮朝 事大交隣政策의 成立과 그 性格; 朝鮮朝 對外政策史 硏究試論, 『溪村閔丙河敎授停年紀念 史學論叢』", ~ (1988)
  52. 손승철, "조선시대 한일관계사연구" (1994), 지성의 샘
  53. 송미령, "입관 전 청조의 심양관 통제양상", 명청사연구, 30 (2008)
  54. 안외순, "고종의 초기(1864-1873) 대외인식 변화와 親政―遣淸回還使 소견을 중심으로―", 한국정치학회보, 30(2) (1996)
  55. 이성규,?중화사상과 민족주의?, "중화사상과 민족주의, 『동아시아 문제와 시각』" (1995), 문학과 지성사
  56. 이영춘, "통문관지의 편찬과 조선후기 한중관계의 성격", 실학사상연구 (2007)
  57. 전해종, "淸代韓中關係의 一考察", 東洋學, 1 (1971)
  58. 정용화, "전환기 자주외교의 개념과 조건: 19세기말 조선의 대칭외교의 이론적 고찰", 국제정치논총, 43(2) (2003)
  59. 정혜중, "청대 조선인과 청국인 범월의 특징: 양국 범월사례의 분석을 중심으로", 명청사연구, 26(26), pp.69~88 (2006), 명청사학회
  60. 최소자, "淸과 朝鮮: 明?淸交替期 동아시아의 國際 秩序에서", 梨花史學硏究, 22 (1995)
  61. 한명기, "병자호란 패전의 정치적 파장―청의 조선 압박과 인조의 대응을 중심으로―", 동방학지, 119 (2003)
  62. 한명기, "영조대 왜관문제와 이이장", 역사문화논총, 3 (2007)
  63. Fairbank,J.K., "A Preliminary Framework:The Chinese World Order" (1968), Harvard University Press
  64. Walker, H. D, "The Yi-Ming Rapprochement: Sino-Korean Foreign Relations, 1392-1592", 박사, pp.1971
  65. 李雲泉, "朝貢制度史論" (2004), 北京:新華出版社
  66. 張存武, "淸代中韓關係論文集" (1987), 臺北:臺灣商務出版社
  67. 張存武, "淸韓宗藩貿易" (1978), 臺北:臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所
  68. 陳顧遠, "中國國際法溯源" (1967), 臺北:商務印書館
  69. 黃枝蓮, "天朝禮治體系硏究 上卷" (1992), 北京:中國人民大學出版社
  70. 濱下武志, "近代中國の國際契機" (1990), 東京:東京大學出版會
  71. 趙志毅, "淸代文字獄辨, 『東南文化』 1997-3期", ~
  72. 李凌, "乾隆時期的文字獄, 『炎黃春秋』 2001-8期", ~
  73. 李岩, "淸初文字獄初探, 『揚州職業大學學報』 2002-3期", ~
  74. 黃少卿, "明淸文字獄及其對文化發展的影響, 『滄州師範專科學校學報』 2003-1期", ~
  75. 蕭, "淸代文字獄案硏究", 碩士, pp.2004
  76. 李博, "從文字獄案件看淸朝皇權與法律的關係", 碩士, pp.2006
  77. 姜寧, "乾隆朝生員文字獄硏究", 碩士, pp.2006
  78. 楊岩, "淸代前期外交硏究", 碩士, pp.2002
  79. 李潤强, "淸初士人的明史意識與康熙朝文字案獄, 『甘肅廣播電視大學學報』 2007-1期", ~
  80. 黃文斌, "再論淸代文字獄, 『邊疆經濟與文化』 2007-2期", ~
  81. 呂立忠, "淸代乾隆時期廣西的文字獄, 『廣西社會科學』 2008-5期", ~
  82. 何芳川, "華夷秩序論, 『北京大學學報』 1998-6期", ~
  83. 喩常森, "試論朝貢制度的演變, 『南洋問題硏究』 2000-1期", ~
  84. 陳捷先, "略論天聰年間後金與朝鮮的關係", 東方學志, 23(24) (1980)
  85. 劉智文, "淸代東北封禁政策芻議, 『學習與探索』 2003-6期", ~
  86. 黃松筠, "論淸代東北封禁與流人文化", 中國邊疆史地硏究, 12(4) (2002)
  87. 杜家驥, "淸改瀋陽爲盛京考述, 『滿族硏究』 1997-4期", ~
  88. 書仁, "論淸朝對東北邊疆各族的管理體制, 『史學集刊』, 2002-4期", ~
  89. 丁海斌, "論淸朝陪都盛京的政治制度", 遼寧大學學報, 34(4) (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)