문법화 관점에서 본 ‘상’ 관련 한국어 보조용언의 의미
A study on Korean aspectual auxiliary verbs from the viewpoint of grammaticalization
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I tried to explain the function of Korean auxiliary verbs that appear together with a main verb within a sentence. From the viewpoint of grammaticalization, most of the auxiliary verbs exist at a middle point on the line of grammaticalization that starts from normal verbs. Therefore they tend to have some grammatical functions, without preserving their lexical meaning. That observation has led to a disagreement on the function of auxiliary verbs. The previous works have insisted that the auxiliary verbs are concerned mainly with ‘aspectectuality’. We showed that Korean auxiliary verbs are divided into two subtypes of aspectuality, i.e. ‘aspect’ and ‘Aktionsart’, where the former is more grammaticalized than the latter. In addition, we also showed that the additional meaning that the verbs functioning as Aktionsart are assumed to have corresponds to ‘modality’. As a result, some auxiliary verbs such as ‘-e pelita’, ‘-e nata’, ‘-ko malta’ etc. have two meanings, Aktionsart and modality.
Abstract
In this paper, I tried to explain the function of Korean auxiliary verbs that appear together with a main verb within a sentence. From the viewpoint of grammaticalization, most of the auxiliary verbs exist at a middle point on the line of grammaticalization that starts from normal verbs. Therefore they tend to have some grammatical functions, without preserving their lexical meaning. That observation has led to a disagreement on the function of auxiliary verbs. The previous works have insisted that the auxiliary verbs are concerned mainly with ‘aspectectuality’. We showed that Korean auxiliary verbs are divided into two subtypes of aspectuality, i.e. ‘aspect’ and ‘Aktionsart’, where the former is more grammaticalized than the latter. In addition, we also showed that the additional meaning that the verbs functioning as Aktionsart are assumed to have corresponds to ‘modality’. As a result, some auxiliary verbs such as ‘-e pelita’, ‘-e nata’, ‘-ko malta’ etc. have two meanings, Aktionsart and modality.
참고문헌 (39)
- 고영근, "한국어의 시제, 서법, 동작상" (2004), 태학사
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 구명철, "연어 Kollokation의 일종으로서 기능동사구", 독어학, (12), pp.1~20 (2005), 한국독어학회
- 김성화, "국어의 상 연구" (1991), 한신문화사
- 김영태, "보조용언의 양태 의미", 우리말글, 16, pp.1~16 (1998)
- 김지은, "우리말 양태 용언 구문 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- 김천학, "국어의 동작상과 동작류", 국어교육, (120), pp.357~378 (2006), 한국어교육학회
- 유수린, "어휘화 Lexikalisierung와 문법화 Grammatikalisierung - 독일어 분사와 한국어 부동사의 비교고찰", 독어학, (12), pp.21~46 (2005), 한국독어학회
- 송경안, "시제와 상의 유형론", 독어학, (13), pp.163~188 (2006), 한국독어학회
- 양정석, "한국어 시간요소들의 형태통사론", 언어, 33(4), pp.693~722 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 옥태권, "국어 상조동사의 의미 연구", 박사, pp.1988
- 우창현, "보조용언의 문법상적 기능에 대하여", 한국어학, 33, pp.283~308 (2006), 한국어학회
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이점출, "독일어 동사의 동작양태(Aktionsart)와 기능 동사구(FVG)", 독어교육, 5, pp.313~339 (1987)
- 이호승, "국어의 상 체계와 보조용언의 상적 의미", 국어학, 38, pp.209~239 (2001)
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 장미라, "한국어 보조 용언의 상적양태적 의미 기능과 통사적 특징", 배달말, (38), pp.33~60 (2006), 배달말학회
- Bybee, Joan L, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Cheon-Kostrzewa, B, "Funktionsvergefüge im Deutschen und im Koreanischen - eine kontrastive Gegenüberstellung", Dogilmunhak, 80, pp.434~459 (2001)
- Comrie, B, "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Heine, B, "Grammaticalization and Linguistic Analysis. In: The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, eds. Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog", pp.401~423 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Helbig, G, "Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht" (1986), Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig
- Hopper, Paul J, "Grammaticalization. Cambridge" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Lehmann, C, "Thought on Grammaticalization" (1995), Lincom Europa
- Lie, Kang-Ho, "Analyse der grammatischen Verbalperiphrase im Koreanischen und im Deutschen", 독어교육, 19, pp.239~263 (2000)
- Lie, Kang-Ho, "Typen aspektueller Verbalperiphrasen im Koreanischen und im Deutschen", 독어교육, 21, pp.231~254 (2001)
- Lyons, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Lyons, J, "Linguistic Semantics" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Moens, M, "Temporal ontology and temporal reference", Computational Linguistics, 14, pp.15~28 (1988)
- Nuyts, J, "Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In: The Expression of Modality, ed. William Frawley", pp.1~26 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Palmer, F. R, "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Polenz, P. V, "Funktionsverben, Funktionsverbgefüge und Verwandtes - Vorschläge zur satzsemantischen Lexikographie", Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 15, pp.169~189 (1987)
- Rhee, S, "Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective", pp.1996
- Sasse, Hans-Jürgen, "Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state", Linguistic Typology, 6, pp.199~271 (2002)
- Schwall, U, "Aspektualität -Eine semantisch-funktionelle Kategorie" (1991), Narr
- Smith, C, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1992), Kluwer
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- van der Auwera, J, "Modality’s semantic map", Linguistic Typology, 2, pp.79~124 (1998)
- Vendler, Z, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press