보조용언의 완료 기능설에 대한 재고
Do the auxiliary verbs have the function of perfective aspect
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine the aspectual functions of the auxiliary verbs ‘nohta'(놓다), 'dooda(두다)', 'beorida'(버리다) 'naeda'(내다) in Korean. It has been argued that these verbs have the meaning of perfective aspect. But these claims weren't examined fully in aspectual theory, and arguers depend on intuition in judging perfect. So there is no agreement on the items of perfective auxiliary verbs, and there are many phenomena we cannot accept if these verbs have the meaning of perfect. I observed the concept of perfective aspect overall and presented the conditions of perfective aspect based on the aspectual logic, and discussed whether the auxiliary verbs can be perfective forms. And I concluded that these auxiliary verbs cannot have the meaning of perfective aspect, by showing 14 evidences. For the most, these verbs cannot mark terminal point and complete the action in situation type. The reasons why these verbs have been misunderstood as perfective aspectual forms were explained in this paper. And I argued that they just represent modal meanings.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the aspectual functions of the auxiliary verbs ‘nohta'(놓다), 'dooda(두다)', 'beorida'(버리다) 'naeda'(내다) in Korean. It has been argued that these verbs have the meaning of perfective aspect. But these claims weren't examined fully in aspectual theory, and arguers depend on intuition in judging perfect. So there is no agreement on the items of perfective auxiliary verbs, and there are many phenomena we cannot accept if these verbs have the meaning of perfect. I observed the concept of perfective aspect overall and presented the conditions of perfective aspect based on the aspectual logic, and discussed whether the auxiliary verbs can be perfective forms. And I concluded that these auxiliary verbs cannot have the meaning of perfective aspect, by showing 14 evidences. For the most, these verbs cannot mark terminal point and complete the action in situation type. The reasons why these verbs have been misunderstood as perfective aspectual forms were explained in this paper. And I argued that they just represent modal meanings.
참고문헌 (38)
- 고영근, "동작상에 대한 이해", 한국어학, 30, pp.1~30 (2006), 한국어학회
- 김종도, "문법과 개념화" (2001), 박이정
- 남기심, "국어문법의 시제 문제에 관한 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
- 김성화, "현대국어의 상 연구" (1990), 한신문화사
- 박덕유, "국어의 동작상 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회
- 서정수, "시상형태의 의미 분석", 문법연구, 3, pp.83~158 (1976)
- 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" (1996), 한국문화사
- 신수송, "국어의 진행상과 결과상 표현에 대하여", 國語學, 39, pp.75~103 (2002), 국어학회
- 양인석, "Progressive and Perfective Aspect in Korean", 언어, 2(1), pp.125~140 (1977)
- 우창현, "상해석의 이론과 실제" (2003), 한국문화사
- 우창현, "보조용언의 문법상적 기능에 대하여", 한국어학, 33, pp.283~308 (2006), 한국어학회
- 이기동, "조동사 ‘있다’의 의미 연구. 눈뫼 허웅박사 환갑기념 논문집", pp.359~387 (1978), 과학사
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이지양, "현대국어의 시상형태에 대한 연구", 국어연구, 51, pp.177~205 (1982)
- 이호승, "국어의 상 체계와 보조용언의 상적 의미", 국어학, 38, pp.209~239 (2001)
- 임홍빈, "부정법 {어}와 상태진술의 {고}", 논문집, 8, pp.13~36 (1975), 국민대
- 정태구, "‘-어 있다’의 의미와 논항구조", 국어학, 24, pp.203~230 (1994)
- 崔東柱, "국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화에 관한 연구", 박사, 언어학, pp.1995
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1980), 정음사
- 한동완, "’-어 있-’ 구성의 결합제약에 대하여", 형태론, 2(2), pp.257~288 (2000)
- Anderson, J. M., "An essay concerning aspect: Some considerations of a general character arising from the Abbe Darrigol's analysis of the Basque verb" (1973), Mouton
- Bybee, J. L., "The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and, modality in the languages of the world" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Dahl, O., "Tense and aspect system" (1985), Blackwell
- Givón, T., "On understanding grammar" (1979), New York Academic Press
- Givón, T., "Syntax: A funtional-typological Introduction 1" (1984), John Benjamins
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Heine, B., "Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter, In Perspectives on grammaticalization", pp.255~287 (1994), John Benjamins
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic structures" (1990), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, R., "The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity and perhaps even quantification in English", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.305~354 (1996)
- Jespersen, O., "The philosophy of grammar of English" (1924), George Allen and Unwin Ltd
- Klein, W., "Time in language" (1994), Routledge
- Palmer, F. R., "The English verb" (1974), Longman
- Rhee, Seongha., "Semantics of verbs and grammaticalization: The development in Korea from a cross-linguistic perspective" (1996), Hankuk Publisher
- Rothestein, S., "Predicates and their subjects" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Smith, C., "The parameter of aspect" (1967), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press