한・일 사죄전략의 대조연구- 체면(face)의 관점에서-
A contrastive study of apologetic strategies - Based on face relationship between Speaker and Hearer -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a study of the focus on apologetic strategies, based on the influence of 'face' between the speaker and the hearer in a conversation. It studied that 'the speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' and 'the hearer's lead in an unpleasant situation' by setting discourse structure. Let arrange used strategies as ‘reason/excuse’ ‘explanation’ ‘admit responsibility’ ‘self-condemnation’ and then the influence of 'Degree of Familiarity’s effect' and 'Politeness’s effect' are affected by use of the strategies. 'A supplementary strategy' in case of 'reason・excuse<explanation< self-condemnation<admit responsibility’ has confirmed that the speaker’s face is threatened and the hearer’s face is protected in Korean. In Japanese, 'reason・excuse<explanation=self-condemnation<admit responsibility’ has confirmed that the speaker’s face in threatened. However, because in the case of 'other-initiation', the results were extracted only from the recognition of responsibility. Thus, in Korean and Japanese, there was a difference in the relationship between the face of the speaker and the hearer in using the strategies.
Abstract
This paper presents a study of the focus on apologetic strategies, based on the influence of 'face' between the speaker and the hearer in a conversation. It studied that 'the speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' and 'the hearer's lead in an unpleasant situation' by setting discourse structure. Let arrange used strategies as ‘reason/excuse’ ‘explanation’ ‘admit responsibility’ ‘self-condemnation’ and then the influence of 'Degree of Familiarity’s effect' and 'Politeness’s effect' are affected by use of the strategies. 'A supplementary strategy' in case of 'reason・excuse<explanation< self-condemnation<admit responsibility’ has confirmed that the speaker’s face is threatened and the hearer’s face is protected in Korean. In Japanese, 'reason・excuse<explanation=self-condemnation<admit responsibility’ has confirmed that the speaker’s face in threatened. However, because in the case of 'other-initiation', the results were extracted only from the recognition of responsibility. Thus, in Korean and Japanese, there was a difference in the relationship between the face of the speaker and the hearer in using the strategies.
참고문헌 (13)
- 공미희, "일본어 배려표현에 관한 고찰 - TV드라마 분석을 통해서 -", 일본어문학, (76), pp.1~22 (2017), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 손세모돌, "한국어와 중국어의 사과표현 대조 연구", 국제어문, (55), pp.183~249 (2012), 국제어문학회
- 전정미, "사과행위의 표현 양상", 담화와 인지, 13(3), pp.167~188 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- 정현아, "負担度の差による謝罪行動の特徴に関する 韓日対照研究 -ポライトネス理論の観点から-", 일어일문학연구, 95(1), pp.243~269 (2015), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 池田理惠子, "謝罪の対照研究ー日米対照研究ーfaceという視点の一考察ー", 日本語学, (12), pp.13~21 (1993)
- 熊谷智子, "研究対象としての謝罪ーいくつかの切り口について", 日本語学, (12), pp.4~10 (1993)
- 熊取谷哲夫, "発話行為理論と発話行動から見た日本語の「詫び」と「感謝」を例にー", 広島大学教育学部紀要, (37), pp.223~234 (1988)
- 熊取谷哲夫, "發話行爲對照理論のための統合的アプローチ-日英語の<詫び>を例-", 日本語敎育, (79), pp.26~40 (1992)
- 佐久間勝彦, "感謝と詫び. 話ことばの表現" (1983), 筑摩書房
- 秦秀美, "日․韓における謝罪表現", 日本語․日本文化研究, (10), pp.83~94 (2000)
- 秦秀美, "日韓における謝罪の「定型表現」の使用について", 関西大学外国語教育フォーラム, 12, pp.1~16 (2013)
- Brown, P., "Politeness: some universal in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University press
- Goffman, Ervin, "relations in public" (1971), harper&Row
