한・일 사죄에 대한 응답전략의 사용양상 -체면과의 관련성을 통해서-
Usage of Response Strategies for Apologies between Korea and Japan - Through the connection to face. -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the response strategies for apologies in Korea and Japan. 'the apology speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' and 'the apology hearer's lead in an un pleasant situation' by setting Discourse structure. In addition, the response strategy was divided into positive, neutral, and negative, and subdivided into consideration, consent, withhold, avoidance, rejection, and criticism. As a result, in the case of Korea, 'the leader of the apology speaker’s unpleasant situation' was in the order of positive>negative>neutral, the degree of face damage of the apology speaker was 'low>high>middle', and the restoration of the relationship was 'O>X>Neutral' in many cases where the relationship was restored. However, the relationship between the two cannot be restored because the 'the hearer's lead in an unpleasant situation' is 'negative>positive>neutral', and the face damage of the speaker of the apology is 'high>low>medium' and the restoration of their relationship is 'X>O>neutral'. In Japan, in the case of 'the speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' the loss of face of the speaker was 'positive> neutral = negative', and 'the hearer's lead in an un pleasant situation' was 'positive > negative and neutral'. Therefore, the face of the apology speaker can be seen as 'O>Neutral=X', 'O>X>Neutral', and in all of these cases, it can be seen that the relationship is often restored. Therefore, it can be seen that the face of the apology speaker is restored as the apology hearer responds more positively, and their relationship with each other is also restored.
Abstract
This study analyzed the response strategies for apologies in Korea and Japan. 'the apology speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' and 'the apology hearer's lead in an un pleasant situation' by setting Discourse structure. In addition, the response strategy was divided into positive, neutral, and negative, and subdivided into consideration, consent, withhold, avoidance, rejection, and criticism. As a result, in the case of Korea, 'the leader of the apology speaker’s unpleasant situation' was in the order of positive>negative>neutral, the degree of face damage of the apology speaker was 'low>high>middle', and the restoration of the relationship was 'O>X>Neutral' in many cases where the relationship was restored. However, the relationship between the two cannot be restored because the 'the hearer's lead in an unpleasant situation' is 'negative>positive>neutral', and the face damage of the speaker of the apology is 'high>low>medium' and the restoration of their relationship is 'X>O>neutral'. In Japan, in the case of 'the speaker's lead in an unpleasant situation' the loss of face of the speaker was 'positive> neutral = negative', and 'the hearer's lead in an un pleasant situation' was 'positive > negative and neutral'. Therefore, the face of the apology speaker can be seen as 'O>Neutral=X', 'O>X>Neutral', and in all of these cases, it can be seen that the relationship is often restored. Therefore, it can be seen that the face of the apology speaker is restored as the apology hearer responds more positively, and their relationship with each other is also restored.
참고문헌 (15)
- 공미희, "일본어 배려표현에 관한 고찰 - TV드라마 분석을 통해서 -", 일본어문학, (76), pp.1~22 (2017), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 김혜지, "연결어미 ‘-니까’의 종결어미화에 대한 연구", 이화어문논집, (40), pp.79~99 (2016), 이화어문학회
- 마쯔바라 요시코, "上下·親疎関係から見た「受諾」と「断り」における表現類型の様相", 일어일문학연구, 88(1), pp.29~52 (2014), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 손동희, "한・일 사죄전략의 대조연구- 체면(face)의 관점에서-", 외국학연구, (46), pp.293~320 (2018), 외국학연구소[DOI]
- 윤상실, "일본어 거절화행 양상 및 전략에 관한 고찰", 일본어학연구, (58), pp.83~99 (2018), 한국일본어학회[DOI]
- 임시은, "비난의 표현방식 –한일 화자의 비교–", 일본연구, (65), pp.351~373 (2015), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 전정미, "사과행위의 표현 양상", 담화와 인지, 13(3), pp.167~188 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- 전정미, "거절 화행에 나타난 대화 전략 연구", 담화와 인지, 16(1), pp.113~134 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 정현아, "負担度の高い場面での『謝罪·応答発話文』の日韓対照", 일본어학연구, (56), pp.121~138 (2018), 한국일본어학회[DOI]
- 大谷麻美, "謝罪に対する緩和的返答のストラテジーポライトネスの観点から", 英米学研究, 3, pp.73~93 (1998)
- 熊取谷哲夫, "発話行為対照理論のための統合的アプローチ-日英語の <詫び>を例-", 日本語敎育, (79), pp.26~40 (1992)
- 秦秀美, "日韓における謝罪の「定型表現」の使用について", 関西大学外国語教育 フォーラム, 12, pp.1~16 (2013)
- 山岡政紀, "日本語語用論入門コミュニケ-ション理論から見た日本語" (2010), 明治書院
- Brown, P., "Politeness : some universal in language" (1987), Ca mbridge University press
- Goffman, Ervin, "Relations in public" (1971), harper&Row