『詩經諺解』(「권 11」～「권 20」)(1613)의 국어 한자음 반영 양상과 성격에 대하여

Abstract

In this article, I tried to examine the reflection patterns of Sino-Korean in the first edition, Sigyeongeonhae(Volume 11~20) (1613), housed in Kyujanggak, Seoul National University, and to examine the characteristics of individual Sino-Korean belonging to each pattern. As a result, I could see that there were many new Sino-Korean that were not seen in the Sino-Korean of the Middle-Korean period, and that there were many differences from the Sino-Korean seen in the Middle-Korean period. Among these Sino-Korean, there were far more cases in number that matched the usual response pattern between used Middle-Chinese and Middle Sino-Korean. However, there are many things that are difficult to explain. Therefore, it can be seen that the variety of Sino-Korean appears. In this article, the discussion was developed by paying attention to only Sino-Korean that were not seen in the previous data. The fact that most of the Sino-Korean in Volume 11~20 are suitable for the usual correspondence between Middle-Chinese and Middle Sino-Korean are considered to be the result of faithfully maintaining the early form of reading, given the position of the scriptures. The results of this review show that it is generally based on Middle-Chinese. However, some of the things that are difficult to find a negative basis with Gwangyun(廣韻) and Jiyun(集韻) are also observed, and many of them can be understood as information contained in other records. And among them, quite a few of them seem to reflect the Modern Chinese hierarchy. Among the Sino-Korean that appeared in this way, when considering the meaning of the phrase of Sigyeong in which the Chinese character was written in both single and plural Sino-Korean, most of them were presented that matched the meaning of the original connection relationship. However, some things did not match this. In the case of single Sino-Korean, the sound inferred from sound indicator or molder is presented. In the case of plural Sino-Korean, the sounds are the same as each other or simplified by the similarity of the meaning corresponding to each sound. In addition, Sino-Korean appears formed by analogy to sound indicator or molder.