『詩經諺解』(1613)의 한자음의 모습에 대하여
A Study on Sino-Korean in Sigyeongeonhae(1613)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to examine Sino-Korean aspects written in Sigyeongeonhae(1613). For this purpose I extracted Sino-Korean from Sigyeongeonhae and classified Sino-Korean into five cases. The first case is Sino-Korean that is not seen in the 15th to 16th century literature and conform to the usual countermeasures. The second case is Sino-Korean that is not seen in the 15th to 16th century literature and does not conform to the usual countermeasures. The third case is the Sino-Korean which is different from the Sino-Korean in the 15th and 16th century. The fourth case is Sino-Korean showing the use of multiple Sino-Korean. The last case is the other. As a result, it can be seen that a large number of Sino- Korean were observed in Sigyeongeonhae. Through this, it can be confirmed that Sigyeongeonhae is a very good text for expanding Sino-Korean data. Also, it was found that Sigyeongeonhae is a good data to fill the shortage of Sino-Korean. In this regard, I think it will be beneficial to quantitatively expand Sino-Korean and to strengthen the qualitative research on Sino-Korean if we go ahead and extract the data from Sigyeongeonhae and analyze the interest.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine Sino-Korean aspects written in Sigyeongeonhae(1613). For this purpose I extracted Sino-Korean from Sigyeongeonhae and classified Sino-Korean into five cases. The first case is Sino-Korean that is not seen in the 15th to 16th century literature and conform to the usual countermeasures. The second case is Sino-Korean that is not seen in the 15th to 16th century literature and does not conform to the usual countermeasures. The third case is the Sino-Korean which is different from the Sino-Korean in the 15th and 16th century. The fourth case is Sino-Korean showing the use of multiple Sino-Korean. The last case is the other. As a result, it can be seen that a large number of Sino- Korean were observed in Sigyeongeonhae. Through this, it can be confirmed that Sigyeongeonhae is a very good text for expanding Sino-Korean data. Also, it was found that Sigyeongeonhae is a good data to fill the shortage of Sino-Korean. In this regard, I think it will be beneficial to quantitatively expand Sino-Korean and to strengthen the qualitative research on Sino-Korean if we go ahead and extract the data from Sigyeongeonhae and analyze the interest.
참고문헌 (36)
- 姜信沆, "韓漢音韻史 硏究" (2003), 태학사
- 姜信沆, "韓漢音韻史 硏究(補遺篇)" (2012), 월인
- 權仁瀚, "국어사 연구", pp.83~344 (1997), 태학사
- 권인한, "國語史와 漢字音", pp.57~94 (2006), 박이정
- 權仁瀚, "中世韓國漢字音訓集成" (2008), 제이앤씨
- 權仁瀚, "中世 韓國漢字音의 分析的 硏究<資料篇>" (2009), 박문사
- 김무림, "한국 한자음의 근대성(1): 반영 양상의 종합", 한국어학, 30, pp.89~132 (2006), 한국어학회
- 김수경, "『詩集傳詳說』에 보이는 『詩經諺解』에 대한 번역학적 고찰", 어문논집, (63), pp.173~194 (2011), 민족어문학회
- 南廣祐, "朝鮮(李朝)漢字音 硏究: 壬辰亂 現實漢字音을 중심으로" (1968), 一潮閣
- 南廣祐, "古今漢韓字典" (1995), 인하대학교 출판부
- 朴文鎬, "楓山記聞錄" (1995)
- 申雅莎, "韓漢音硏究", 博士, pp.2006
- 심경호, "조선시대 漢文學과 詩經學", pp.466~484 (1999), 일지사
- 李敦柱, "訓蒙字會 漢字音 硏究", 박사, pp.1980
- 李敦柱, "漢字音韻學의 理解" (1995), 탑출판사
- 李敦柱, "韓中漢字音硏究" (2003), 태학사
- 이돈주, "國語史와 漢字音", pp.335~372 (2006), 박이정
- 李潤東, "中期 韓國漢字音의 理解" (1988), 우골탑
- 李潤東, "韓國漢字音의 理解" (1997), 형성출판사
- 이준환, "16세기 후반․17세기 國語 漢字音 韻母의 대응 양상 및 특징(1)", 한국어학, 51, pp.189~219 (2011), 한국어학회
- 李忠九, "經書 諺解 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1990
- 정경일, "國語史와 漢字音", pp.95~176 (2006), 박이정
- 지교헌, "壺山 朴文鎬의 生涯와 思想Ⅰ", 호서문화연구, 2, pp.33~57 (1982), 충북대학교 호서문화연구소
- 차익종, "중세한국한자음 ‘ㅓ∼ㅔ’, ‘ㅕ∼ㅖ’ 형에 대하여 -遇攝 魚韻의 ‘ㅣ’ 덧남 변칙음을 중심으로-", 國語學, (86), pp.157~180 (2018), 국어학회[DOI]
- 최미현, "한국 한자음의 이중음 연구 : 『전운옥편』의 복수 한자음을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2006
- 한경호, "『詩經諺解』에 제시된 독음과 『經傳釋文』 音切의 비교연구 - 유추음을 중심으로 -", 반교어문연구, (44), pp.153~180 (2016), 반교어문학회
- 황위주, "시경詩經의 형성과 양식적 특징", 선비문화, 10, pp.52~65 (2006), 남명학연구원
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學" (1975), 범학도서
- 陸志韋, "古今說略" (1971), 學生書局
- 李榮, "切韻音系" (1952), 中國科學院
- 周法高, "漢字古今音彙" (1973), 中文大學出版社
- 藤堂明保, "中國語音韻論" (1957), 江南書院
- 藤堂明保, "新訂 中國語槪論" (1985), 大修館書店
- 伊藤智ゆき, "朝鮮漢字音の硏究", 博士, pp.2002
- 河野六郞, "朝鮮漢字音の硏究" (1968), 天理時報社
- Karlgren, Bernhard, "Compendium of Phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese" (1954), The Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities