언해 문헌에 수록된 한국한자음 이독자의 음의관계에 대한 수량비교연구
A Quantity Comparative Study on the Phonetic and Semantic Analysis Relation of Sino-Joseon Korean Words Recorded in EonHae (Korean Character Translated) Books
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the phonetic and semantic analysis relation between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean words. This study selects the representative examples which reflect relation the phonetic and semantic analysis relation between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean words were stereotyped and quantified. As a result of analyzing through this process, there were regular usage and irregular use of the relationship between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean. In the case of the former, it can be divided into two types depending on whether the variant of Sino-Joseon Korean is related to the variant of ancient Chinese words or not. It can be seen in all three types. The first type is the type in which “the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of Acient Chinese consonant changing words correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon period”, and the applicable examples are “降” character and “壞” character. The second type is a type in which “the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of Acient Chinese tone changing words and phrases correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon period”, and the corresponding examples are “共”, “斷”, “巧”, “當”. The third type is the type in which the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of acient Chinese tone change words correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon periodnegative relation between the reader and the sound dynamics of the ancient Chinese is irregular, and the applicable examples are “究” and “蹶”.
Abstract
This study investigates the phonetic and semantic analysis relation between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean words. This study selects the representative examples which reflect relation the phonetic and semantic analysis relation between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean words were stereotyped and quantified. As a result of analyzing through this process, there were regular usage and irregular use of the relationship between the variant of ancient Chinese words and the Sino-Joseon Korean. In the case of the former, it can be divided into two types depending on whether the variant of Sino-Joseon Korean is related to the variant of ancient Chinese words or not. It can be seen in all three types. The first type is the type in which “the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of Acient Chinese consonant changing words correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon period”, and the applicable examples are “降” character and “壞” character. The second type is a type in which “the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of Acient Chinese tone changing words and phrases correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon period”, and the corresponding examples are “共”, “斷”, “巧”, “當”. The third type is the type in which the phonetic and semantic analysis relation of acient Chinese tone change words correspond to variants of Sino-Joseon Korean words which were recorded in various documents in Joseon periodnegative relation between the reader and the sound dynamics of the ancient Chinese is irregular, and the applicable examples are “究” and “蹶”.
참고문헌 (34)
- 顧野王, "原本玉篇殘卷" (2004), 中華書局
- 陳彭年, "大廣益會玉篇" (2004), 中華書局
- 陸德明, "經典釋文" (1988), 學海出版社
- 陳彭年, "廣韻" (1960), 中華書局
- 賈昌朝, "群經音辨" (1934), 商務印書館
- 김무봉, "역주육조법보단경언해" (2007), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 김정수, "역주진언권공ㆍ삼단시식문언해" (2008), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 정호완, "역주번역소학" (2011), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 정호완, "역주소학언해" (2011), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 장세경, "역주논어언해" (2011), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 장세경, "역주대학언해" (2012), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 장세경, "역주중용언해" (2012), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 장세경, "역주맹자언해" (2013), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 정호완, "역주효경언해" (2014), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 周法高, "中國古代語法ㆍ構詞編" (1962)
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (1980), 中華書局
- 俞昌均, "삼국시대의 漢字音" (1991), 민음사
- 孫玉文, "漢語變調構詞研究" (2007), 商務印書館
- 孫玉文, "漢語變調構詞考辨" (2015), 商務印書館
- 嚴翼相, "한국한자음 중국식으로 보기" (2008), 韓國文化社
- 權仁瀚, "中世韓國漢字音音訓集成" (2009), 도서출판 제이앤씨
- 權仁瀚, "中世韓國漢字音의 分析的研究" (2009), 박문사
- 郭錫良, "漢字古音手冊" (2010), 商務印書館
- 何野六郎, "한국 한자음의 연구" (2010), 도서출판 역락
- 資料篇, "韓國漢字音研究 本文篇", pp.2011, 伊藤 智ゆき
- 周祖謨, "問學集" (1946), 中華書局
- G. B. Dower, "Derivation by Tone-change in Classical Chinese", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, (22) (1959)
- "한글", 1967, ~
- "한글", 1967, ~
- 孫玉文, "從“聞”“見”的音變構詞看上古漢語有被動構詞", 湖北大學學報 (2004)
- 孫玉文, "漢語變調構詞研究" (2007), 商務印書館
- 孫玉文, "漢語的歷史探討" (2011), 中華書局
- 孫洪偉, "從『經典釋文』看“見”字見母變匣母的構詞", 古漢語研究 (2009)
- 염재웅, "조선초기 언해자료에 반영된 한어변조구사법", 중국언어연구, (61), pp.349~382 (2015), 한국중국언어학회
