명예훼손죄 및 모욕죄의 언어학적 분석
A Linguistic Analysis of Defamation and Insult Laws
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There has been growing interest in defamation and insult laws in South Korea because many people can easily post malicious comments with the increasing use of the Internet. However, there is a lack of linguistic evidence to determine whether statements are defamatory. For this reason, there are instances where two similar expressions lead to different results in defamation and insult cases. The purpose of this study is to examine several contextual factors including participants, speech acts, medium, conveyed meaning, style, setting, grammatical referencing, malicious language, co-text, and discourse structure, applying Harkess (1996) and Shuy (2010). To determine defamatory meaning, it is important to consider the illocutionary force of speakers’ speech act, the perlocutionary effect on hearers, the use of defamatory words, implied meaning, and framing. It also analyzes defamation and insult precedents in South Korea using linguistic tools, which show that language evidence may help resolve legal disputes.
Abstract
There has been growing interest in defamation and insult laws in South Korea because many people can easily post malicious comments with the increasing use of the Internet. However, there is a lack of linguistic evidence to determine whether statements are defamatory. For this reason, there are instances where two similar expressions lead to different results in defamation and insult cases. The purpose of this study is to examine several contextual factors including participants, speech acts, medium, conveyed meaning, style, setting, grammatical referencing, malicious language, co-text, and discourse structure, applying Harkess (1996) and Shuy (2010). To determine defamatory meaning, it is important to consider the illocutionary force of speakers’ speech act, the perlocutionary effect on hearers, the use of defamatory words, implied meaning, and framing. It also analyzes defamation and insult precedents in South Korea using linguistic tools, which show that language evidence may help resolve legal disputes.
참고문헌 (15)
- 이성범, "명예훼손성 발화에 대한 한국어 사용자의 지각과 대응 유형", 언어, 45(3), pp.579~600 (2020), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 이원표, "한국 정치담화의 언어학적 분석" (2015), 한국문화사
- 이해윤, "화행이론에 의한 모욕죄·명예훼손죄 분석", 텍스트언어학, 44, pp.123~147 (2018), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 정영환, "직시적 표현의 화용적 의미해석", 언어과학, 5(1), pp.237~256 (1998)
- 정희자, "발화 의미와 추론", 언어과학, 12(3), pp.101~118 (2005), 한국언어과학회
- American Law Institute, "Restatement of the Law: Second: Torts 2d. Vol. 3", pp.504~707 (1977), American Law Institute Publishers
- Garssen, B., "Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation", pp.157~168 (2012), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- Hansen, M. F., "Fact, Opinion, and Consensus: The Verifiability of Allegedly Defamatory Speech", Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 62, pp.43~ (1993)
- Harkess, J., "A Linguistic Inspection of the Law of Defamation", Auckland U. L. Rev., 8, pp.653~ (1996)
- 이성범, "A Pragmatic Analysis of Defamation and Slanderous Remarks", 언어, 37(2), pp.401~416 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Mannes, A. E., "Shorn Scalps and Perceptions of Male Dominance", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), pp.198~205 (2013)[DOI]
- Meibauer, J., "Pejoration", pp.145~166 (2016), John Benjamins
- Shuy, R. W., "The Language of Defamation Cases" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Tiersma, P. M., "The Language of Defamation", Texas Law Review, 66(2), pp.303~350 (1987)
- van Dijk, T. A., "Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach" (1998), Sage