본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대화 수신 술어와 그 보어절의 유형에 대한 소고: 장거리 결속에서의 주어 지향성을 중심으로

A Study on Communicative Reception Predicates and their Complement Types: based on the Subject-orientation in Long Distance Binding.

강은지|허세문
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2021.02|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제28권 제1호|pp. 1-38|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2021.28.1.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

cakizijiindexical shiftlogophoricity대화 수신 술어주어 지향성장거리 결속태도담지자담화대용“자기”“ziji”직시 전환발화전달 구문communicative reception predicatessubject-orientationlong distance bindingattitude holderhear-say construction
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to analyze the syntactic/semantic nature of communicative reception reporting, focusing on the predicate tut- ‘hear’ in Korean. Some literature remarks that when tut- selects a ko complement to represent an indirect speech act, the subject-orientation of long distance caki can be circumvented. However, little attention goes to the fact that when a kes complement is used instead, such obviation cannot occur. To explain this kind of tension, we propose that (i) in terms of logophority, it is an attitude holder that becomes a target of the subject-orientation, and (ii) unlike kes complements, ko complements should employ an additional hidden speaking component where an attitude holder is determined via an independently motivated pragmatic condition. Several related environments are compared to buttress these points; e.g., indexical shifts in Turkish, long distance ziji in Mandarin Chinese, and a hear-say reporting construction in Korean.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the syntactic/semantic nature of communicative reception reporting, focusing on the predicate tut- ‘hear’ in Korean. Some literature remarks that when tut- selects a ko complement to represent an indirect speech act, the subject-orientation of long distance caki can be circumvented. However, little attention goes to the fact that when a kes complement is used instead, such obviation cannot occur. To explain this kind of tension, we propose that (i) in terms of logophority, it is an attitude holder that becomes a target of the subject-orientation, and (ii) unlike kes complements, ko complements should employ an additional hidden speaking component where an attitude holder is determined via an independently motivated pragmatic condition. Several related environments are compared to buttress these points; e.g., indexical shifts in Turkish, long distance ziji in Mandarin Chinese, and a hear-say reporting construction in Korean.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. 권재일, "한국어 발화동사 구문 기술", 한말연구, 7, pp.1~26 (2000)
  2. 김천학, "보절의 사실성에 대한 고찰", 한국어학, 86, pp.179~204 (2020), 한국어학회
  3. 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  4. 장석진, "조응의 담화 기능: 재귀표현을 중심으로", 한글, 194, pp.121~155 (1986)
  5. 장석진, "한국어 화행 동사의 분석과 분류", 어학연구, 23(3), pp.307~331 (1987)
  6. 조경순, "국어 발화동사 구문 연구", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.289~312 (2009), 한국어의미학회
  7. 허세문, "한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근", 언어학, (70), pp.141~178 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  8. 허세문, "‘자기’의 인칭 제약과 그 함의에 대한 소고", 언어와 정보, 24(2), pp.51~76 (2020), 한국언어정보학회[DOI]
  9. Anand, P, "De de se", 박사, pp.2006
  10. Anand, P, "The Cross-linguistic Manifestations of de se Expressions", Handout from Arché, 2009, ~[DOI]
  11. AnderBois, S., "An Illocutionary Account of Reportative Evidentials in Imperatives", Proceedings of SALT, 27, pp.459~479 (2017)[DOI]
  12. Ceong, H. H., "Korean Hearsay Constructions and Speech Act Phrases", Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (2016)
  13. Clements, G, "The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse", Journal of West African Languages, 10, pp.141~177 (1975)
  14. Cole, P., "Principles and Parameters of Long-distance Reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
  15. Cole, P., "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. III", pp.21~84 (2006), Blackwell
  16. Gunlogson, C., "True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English", 박사, pp.2001
  17. Haegeman, L, "West Flemish Verb-based Discourse Markers and the Articulation of the Speech Act Layer", Studia Linguistica, 68(1), pp.116~139 (2014)[DOI]
  18. Han, C.-H, "Semantic Binding of Long-distance Anaphor caki in Korean", Language, 88, pp.764~790 (2012)[DOI]
  19. Heim, I, "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell
  20. Huang, C.-T. J, "Long-distance Reflexives", pp.141~192 (2001), Academic Press
  21. 강남길, "Communication Verbs and Control", 언어과학, 27(3), pp.259~278 (2020), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  22. Kaplan, D, "Themes from Kaplan" (1989), Oxford University Press
  23. Kim, S. -Y, "Acceptability and Preference in the Interpretation of Anaphors", Linguistics, 38, pp.315~353 (2000)
  24. Kim, M-J, "E-type Anaphora and Three Types of Kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)[DOI]
  25. Korotkova, N., "Evidentials and (relayed) Speech Acts", Proceedings of SALT, 25, pp.676~694 (2015)
  26. Kratzer, A, "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer
  27. "Decomposing Attitude Verbs. Handout from the Workshop in Honor of Anita Mittwoch" (2006)[URL]
  28. Kratzer, A., "Modals and Conditionals" (2012), Oxford University Press
  29. "Evidential Moods in Attitude and Speech Reports" (2016)[URL]
  30. Kuno, S, "Empathy and Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), pp.625~672 (1977)
  31. Landau, I., "A Two-Tired Theory of Control" (2015), MIT Press
  32. 이정민, "Factivity Alternation of Attitude ‘know’ in Korean, Mongolian, Uyghur, Manchu, Azeri, etc. and Content Clausal Nominals", Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(4), pp.451~503 (2019), 인지과학연구소[DOI]
  33. Lihua Pei, "Aspects of Binding Phenomena in Three Chinese Reflexives", 언어과학, 26(2), pp.231~251 (2019), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  34. Miyagawa, S, "Agreement Beyond Phi" (2017), MIT Press
  35. Moulton, K., "Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation", 박사, pp.2009
  36. Moulton, K, "CPs: Copies and Compositionality", Linguistic Inquiry, 46, pp.305~342 (2015)[DOI]
  37. Oshima, D. Y., "Perspectives in Reported Discourse", 박사, pp.2006
  38. Özyıldız, D, "Communicative Reception Reports as Hear-say: Evidence from Indexical Shift in Turkish", Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.296~305 (2019), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  39. Pan, H, "Long-distance Reflexives", pp.279~316 (2001), Academic Press
  40. Park, Y., "Indexical Shift and the Long-distance Reflexive caki in Korean", 석사, pp.2015
  41. Park, Y., "Attitude De Se and Logophoricity", 박사, pp.2018
  42. Park, Y.-j, "The Syntactic and Semantic Characteristics of Korean Hearsay Marker –y", 석사, pp.2020
  43. Pearson, H, "The Interpretation of the Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe", Natural Language Semantics, 23, pp.77~128 (2015)[DOI]
  44. Pollard, C, "Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
  45. Reinhart, T, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
  46. Schlenker, P, "A Plea for Monsters", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.29~120 (2003)[DOI]
  47. Schlenker, P, "The Handbook of Semantics", pp.1561~1604 (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
  48. Sells, P, "Aspects of Logophoricity", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445~481 (1987)
  49. Stalnaker, R, "Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics", pp.315~332 (1978), Academic Press
  50. The Syntax and Semantics of Indexical Shifting in Modern Uyghur, "Sudo, Y.", MIT, ~ (2010)
  51. Sundaresan, S., "An Alternative Model of Indexical Shift", Handout from MIT Colloquium Talk (2018)
  52. Tenny, L. C, "Evidentiality, Experiencers, and the Syntax of Sentience in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, pp.245~288 (2006)
  53. Wang, Y, "Empathy and Chinese Long-distance Reflexive ziji—Remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007)", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(1), pp.307~322 (2015)[DOI]
  54. Yang, D. -W, "The Dual Property of Anaphors", Language Research, 27, pp.407~435 (1991)
  55. Yoon, J. -M., "Long-distance Anaphors in Korean and Their Crosslinguistic Implications", Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society, 25, pp.479~495 (1989), Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago

관련 논문AI추천

보어 유형의 의미와 분포: 명제태도 술어와의 관계를 중심으로김건희, 허세문한국언어학회 · 언어2023 · 제48권 제4호한국어의 다양한 인칭 제약에 대한 소고허세문언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2020 · 제40권 한국어 인용 구문과 통사-화용 접면 이론박소영한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2025 · 제35권 제1호담화 맥락과 통사론: 한국어 인칭 제약에 대한 통사론적 접근박소영언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2020 · 제41권 한국어 전달문의 혼합유형에 관한 몇 가지 관찰- 자유간접화법과 내포직접화법을 중심으로노은주담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2021 · 제28권 제2호Subject Constraints and the Consciousness Projection김재은한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

부가어조건과 대병합권기양, 이원빈pp. 39-58영어 전용 수업에서 영어 전용의 의미: 학습자들의 관점들로 본 교실 내 영어 사용 현황송주영, 전지현, 박기성pp. 59-84한국어와 몽골어 비교언어학 연구의 쟁점 -개연성있는 공통어휘를 제시하며박재익pp. 85-112한국어 스트리핑 구문의 복합명사구 제약 효과이두원pp. 113-135스토리텔링의 활용이 영어 능력 향상에 미치는 영향: 메타분석이제영pp. 137-161
원문 보기