정치 담화에 나타난 명예훼손 발화의 명시성 비교 연구
A Contrastive Pragmatic Study on Explicitness of Defamatory Statements in Political Discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze defamatory statements in American and Korean political discourse, and to compare their degree of explicitness cross-culturally using an experimental method. This study defines defamatory statements as the illocutionary acts of accusation and insult, and hypothesizes that Americans make defamatory statements more explicitly than Koreans based on Hofstede’s(2001) cultural dimensions. A total of 463 tokens are collected from presidential TV debates and analyzed on the basis of Stadler’s(2011) coding system. The explicitness of defamatory statements is also discussed with regard to the cultural dimensions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze defamatory statements in American and Korean political discourse, and to compare their degree of explicitness cross-culturally using an experimental method. This study defines defamatory statements as the illocutionary acts of accusation and insult, and hypothesizes that Americans make defamatory statements more explicitly than Koreans based on Hofstede’s(2001) cultural dimensions. A total of 463 tokens are collected from presidential TV debates and analyzed on the basis of Stadler’s(2011) coding system. The explicitness of defamatory statements is also discussed with regard to the cultural dimensions.
참고문헌 (18)
- 이성범, "마이클 브라운 피격 사건에 대한네티즌 분노 반응 표현 연구", 영미연구, 39, pp.269~296 (2017), 영미연구소[DOI]
- Abdul Halim, S, "Impoliteness Strategies Used in a Politician’s Facebook", Doctoral, pp.2015
- Blum-Kulka, S, "Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies" (1989), Ablex
- Bond, M. H, "Culturally Speaking", pp.47~71 (2000), Continuum
- Dailey, W. O, "Politeness in Presidential Debates: Shaping Political Face in Campaign Debates from 1960 to 2004" (2004), Rowman and Littlefield
- Georgakopoulou, A, "Arguing about the Future: on Indirect Disagreements in Conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.1881~1900 (2001)
- Heritage, J, "The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content", Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp.1427~1446 (2002)
- Hofstede, G, "Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations" (2001), Sage Publications
- Ilie, C, "Contrastive Studies in the Confrontational Strategies of Parliamentary Problem-solving Practices", pp.45~86 (2003), John Benjamins
- Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C, "Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness", pp.16~45 (2013), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- 이성범, "A Pragmatic Analysis of Defamation and Slanderous Remarks", 언어, 37(2), pp.401~416 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Luginbühl, M, "Conversational Violence in Political TV debates: Forms and Functions", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), pp.1371~1387 (2007)
- Márquez Reiter, R, "A Contrastive Study of Conventional Indirectness in Spanish: Evidence from Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish", Pragmatics, 12, pp.135~151 (2002)
- Stadler, S. A, "Coding Speech Acts for Their Degree of Explicitness", Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), pp.36~50 (2011)
- Tiersma, P. M, "The Language of Defamation", Texas Law Review, 66(2), pp.303~350 (1987)
- van Dijk, T. A, "Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis", Discourse & Society, 4(2), pp.249~283 (1993)
- van Dijk, T. A, "Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach" (1998), Sage Publications
- Vorderwülbecke, K, "Vor-Sätze zu einer Neuen Deutschen Grammatik", pp.247~279 (1986), Narr