화행이론에 의한 모욕죄·명예훼손죄 분석
An Analysis of Insult and Defamation within Speech Act Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper we try to analyse the cases of insulting or defamation from the viewpoint of speech act theory. In general, lawyers judge the cases depending on whether the utterance include the expressions which can lower the reputation of hearers. But the methodology is considered to be subjective, so the judgement often remains in controversy. Instead we present an objective method which is based mainly on the speech act theory. Following Tiersma (1987), we assume that language crimes such as insult or defamation consist of an illocutionary act and a perlocutionary act. The analysis proceeds as follows: Firstly we find out the expression reflecting the concept of ‘social face’, based on the work of Kim and Yang (2011). Secondly we check out the felicity conditions of the proposed illocutionary act ‘defaming’ which contains the concept ‘social face’ as its component. Lastly we examine if the utterance violates the ‘social face’ in the sense of impoliteness strategies in Culpeper (1996). We analyse some precedents by the proposed framework, which show that our linguistic analysis can complement the legal analysis which may contain some errors.
Abstract
In this paper we try to analyse the cases of insulting or defamation from the viewpoint of speech act theory. In general, lawyers judge the cases depending on whether the utterance include the expressions which can lower the reputation of hearers. But the methodology is considered to be subjective, so the judgement often remains in controversy. Instead we present an objective method which is based mainly on the speech act theory. Following Tiersma (1987), we assume that language crimes such as insult or defamation consist of an illocutionary act and a perlocutionary act. The analysis proceeds as follows: Firstly we find out the expression reflecting the concept of ‘social face’, based on the work of Kim and Yang (2011). Secondly we check out the felicity conditions of the proposed illocutionary act ‘defaming’ which contains the concept ‘social face’ as its component. Lastly we examine if the utterance violates the ‘social face’ in the sense of impoliteness strategies in Culpeper (1996). We analyse some precedents by the proposed framework, which show that our linguistic analysis can complement the legal analysis which may contain some errors.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김갑년, "독일어에 나타난 욕설의 화행론적 고찰", 텍스트언어학, 7, pp.447~465 (1999)
- 박경신, "모욕죄의 보호법익 및 법원의 현행 적용방식에 대한 헌법적 평가", 언론과 법, 10(2), pp.441~467 (2011), (사)한국언론법학회
- 이경재, "모욕죄의 쟁점사항과 관련 판례 고찰 - 대법원 2015. 12. 24. 선고 2015도6622 판결 -", 법조, 65(8), pp.626~649 (2016), 법조협회[DOI]
- 이해윤, "화행이론에 의한 협박죄 분석", 텍스트언어학, 41, pp.219~244 (2016), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 이혜용, "한국어 정표화행 연구 : 정표화행의 유형 분류와 수행 형식", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2010
- 조국, "사실적시 명예훼손죄 및 모욕죄의 재구성", 형사정책, 25(3), pp.9~46 (2013), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
- 표성수, "형법상 모욕죄의 문제와 개선방안", 법조, 64(4), pp.5~44 (2015), 법조협회[DOI]
- Austin, J. L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Oxford University Press
- Bonacchi, Silvia, "Der Mensch und seine Sprachen", pp.1~20 (2012), Peter Lang
- Bousfield, Derek, "Impoliteness in Interaction" (2008), John Benjamins
- Brown, P., "Politeness" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Culpeper, Jonathan, "Towards an anatomy of impoliteness", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.349~369 (1996)
- Culpeper, Jonathan, "Impoliteness: using language to cause offence" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Danet, B., "Language in the legal process", Law & Society Review, 14, pp.445~564 (1980)
- Fobbe, Eilika, "Forensische Linguistik: Eine Einführung" (2011), Narr Verlag
- Gibbons, John, "Forensic Linguistics: an Introduction to Language in the Justice System" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
- Graumann, Carl-Friedrich, "Verletzende Worte: die Grammatik sprachlicher Mißachtung", pp.147~177 (2007)
- Greenawalt, K., "Speech, Crime and the Uses of Language" (1989), Oxford University Press
- Harras, Gisela, "Handbuch deutscher Kommunikationsverben" (2004), De Gruyter
- Hundsnurscher, Franz, "Intention-Bedeutung- Kommunikation", pp.363~376 (1997), Westdeutscher Verlag
- Kauffeld, Fred, "Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing", OSSA Conference Archive (1997)
- Kim, Yungwook, "The influence of Chemyon on facework and conflict styles: Searching for the Korean face and its impact", Public Relations Review, 37, pp.60~67 (2011)
- Kniffka, Hannes, "Working in Language and Law: A German Perspective" (2007), Palgrave Mamillan
- Lim,Tae-Seop, "Communication in personal relationships across cultures", pp.122~136 (1996), Sage
- Marten-Cleef, Susanne, "Gefühle ausdrücken: die expressiven Sprechakte" (1991), Kümmerle
- Meibauer, Jörg, "Pejoration", pp.145~166 (2016), John Benjamins
- Neu, Jerome, "Sticks and Stones. The Philosophy of Insults" (2008), Oxford University Press
- SCHULZE Florian, "Beschimpfungen in der Phraseologie - Untersuchung zu semantischen und pragmatischen Aspekten", 독어독문학, 53(4), pp.281~301 (2012), 한국독어독문학회[DOI]
- Searle, John R., "Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Searle, John R., "Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science 9: language, mind and knowledge", pp.344~369 (1975)
- Shuy, Roger W., "Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom" (1993), Blackwell
- Shuy, Roger W., "The Language of Defamation Cases" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M., "Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations", Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp.529~545 (2002)
- Tiersma, Peter, "The language of defamation", Texas Law Review, 66 (1987)