주체높임을 나타내는 어미 ‘-(으)ㅂ시-’의 발달 ― {-시-}의 형성과 ‘-(으)ㅂ시-’에 이른 변화 ―
The Development of the Subject-Honorific Marker -(u)psi- in Korean: The formation of {-sopsi-} and the change of it into -(u)psi Kwang
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to explain the development of the pre-final ending -(u)psi- indicating subject-honorification in Korean. The degree of honorificity of -(u)psi- is higher than that of another subject-honorific marker -(u)si-. It is believed that -(u)psi- is the descendant of Middle Korean {-sopsi-} (-zopsi-/-sopsi-/-copsi-), which I interpret to be a fused form of the two pre-final endings {-sop-} and {-usi-}. {-sop-} has three types of allomorphs -zop-/-zoW-~-sop-/-soW~ -cop-/-coW- and normal sequences of {-sop-} and {-usi-} are -zoWosi- (/zʌßʌsi/), -soWosi- and -coWosi-. {-sop-} denotes respect for the person referred to by the noun in the verb phrase. According to the social relationship between the speaker, the hearer, the person referred to by the subject, and the person referred to by the noun in the verb phrase, there are four cases: one in which both {-sop-} and {-usi-} are necessary, one in which only {-sop-} is necessary, one in which only {-usi-} is necessary, and one in which neither {-sop-} nor {-usi-} is necessary. Speakers of Middle Korean had to make judgments instantaneously about which to choose among the four cases and may have often made errors. For example, they may have often produced pwo-zop-kwo instead of pwo-si-kwo by error. They may have often realized the error before completing pwo-zop-kwo and attempted to correct the error. In those cases pwo-zopsi-kwo may have often been produced. Hence came the fused form {-sopsi-}, I believe. The fused form {-sopsi-} created by error was reinterpreted as a form indicating higher honorificity than {-usi-} and thus it could survive. In Present-day Korean the descendant of {-sop-} is -p-/-sup- (postvocalic vs. postconsonantal allomorph) and so the expected descendant of {-sopsi-} is -psi-/-supsi-. However, the real one is -psi-/-upsi-, i.e. -(u)psi-. This situation is explained as follows. The expected descendant of the postconsonantal -sopsi-/-copsi- is -supsi-. But the former had already been replaced by -sowosi-/-cowosi- before the 17th century. The replacement is interpreted to be the effect of a dissimilatory force. Korean has a tendency to avoid two s sounds occurring in adjacent syllables, which is a fact that has emerged in this paper. The avoidance may be due to the feature [+strident] of s sound. Now -psi-/-upsi- should be regarded as the descendant of -opsi-/-sowosi-/-cowosi-. The overwhelming frequency of the postvocalic -opsi- made it extend its distribution to the postconsonantal position and -sowosi-/-cowosi- disappeared eventually. The initial vowel of -opsi- was deleted postvocalically and we have -psi-/-upsi- today.
Abstract
This paper aims to explain the development of the pre-final ending -(u)psi- indicating subject-honorification in Korean. The degree of honorificity of -(u)psi- is higher than that of another subject-honorific marker -(u)si-. It is believed that -(u)psi- is the descendant of Middle Korean {-sopsi-} (-zopsi-/-sopsi-/-copsi-), which I interpret to be a fused form of the two pre-final endings {-sop-} and {-usi-}. {-sop-} has three types of allomorphs -zop-/-zoW-~-sop-/-soW~ -cop-/-coW- and normal sequences of {-sop-} and {-usi-} are -zoWosi- (/zʌßʌsi/), -soWosi- and -coWosi-. {-sop-} denotes respect for the person referred to by the noun in the verb phrase. According to the social relationship between the speaker, the hearer, the person referred to by the subject, and the person referred to by the noun in the verb phrase, there are four cases: one in which both {-sop-} and {-usi-} are necessary, one in which only {-sop-} is necessary, one in which only {-usi-} is necessary, and one in which neither {-sop-} nor {-usi-} is necessary. Speakers of Middle Korean had to make judgments instantaneously about which to choose among the four cases and may have often made errors. For example, they may have often produced pwo-zop-kwo instead of pwo-si-kwo by error. They may have often realized the error before completing pwo-zop-kwo and attempted to correct the error. In those cases pwo-zopsi-kwo may have often been produced. Hence came the fused form {-sopsi-}, I believe. The fused form {-sopsi-} created by error was reinterpreted as a form indicating higher honorificity than {-usi-} and thus it could survive. In Present-day Korean the descendant of {-sop-} is -p-/-sup- (postvocalic vs. postconsonantal allomorph) and so the expected descendant of {-sopsi-} is -psi-/-supsi-. However, the real one is -psi-/-upsi-, i.e. -(u)psi-. This situation is explained as follows. The expected descendant of the postconsonantal -sopsi-/-copsi- is -supsi-. But the former had already been replaced by -sowosi-/-cowosi- before the 17th century. The replacement is interpreted to be the effect of a dissimilatory force. Korean has a tendency to avoid two s sounds occurring in adjacent syllables, which is a fact that has emerged in this paper. The avoidance may be due to the feature [+strident] of s sound. Now -psi-/-upsi- should be regarded as the descendant of -opsi-/-sowosi-/-cowosi-. The overwhelming frequency of the postvocalic -opsi- made it extend its distribution to the postconsonantal position and -sowosi-/-cowosi- disappeared eventually. The initial vowel of -opsi- was deleted postvocalically and we have -psi-/-upsi- today.
참고문헌 (42)
- 강신항, "치음과 한글 표기", 국어학, 12, pp.13~34 (1983)
- 강한영, "계축일기" (1974), 을유문화사
- 고광모, "16세기 국어의 명령법 어미 `-소", 소, 언어학, pp.2000, (27)[DOI]
- 고광모, "상대높임의 조사 ‘-요’와 ‘-(이)ㅂ쇼’의 기원과 형성 과정", 국어학, 36, pp.259~282 (2000)
- 고광모, "일부 방언들의 주체 높임법에 나타나는 ‘-겨-’의 역사(2) - 선어말 어미 ‘-어겨-’의 형성과 ‘-겨-’의 분포 변화", 언어학, (28), pp.3~26 (2001), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 고광모, "중부 방언과 남부 방언의 ‘-소", 오’계 어미들의 역사 ―명령법을중심으로―, 2001, pp.253, 135~167
- 고광모, "상대높임의 조사 ‘-요’의 형성에 대한 재론 ―정승철(2002)에 대한비판―", 형태론, 5(2), pp.379~387 (2003)
- 고광모, "중세 국어의 선어말어미 ‘-삽-’의 발달에 대하여", 언어학, (65), pp.39~59 (2013), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 고광모, "체언 끝의 변화 ‘ㄷ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅌ>ㅅ’에 대한 재론", 언어학, (70), pp.205~254 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 신소설의 언어 사용 실태 조사, "국립국어연구원", 국립국어연구원, ~ (1994)
- 金星奎, "중세국어의 聲調 변화에 대한 연구", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1994
- 김영신, "경남 방언의 굴곡론적 연구 ―창원 방언을 중심으로―", 한국방언학, 2, pp.13~38 (1982), 한국방언학회
- 김일근, "언간의 연구" (1991), 건국대학교 출판부
- 김재문, "서부 경남 방언의 문법 연구(1)―종지형을 중심으로―", 진주교대 논문집, 17, pp.37~54 (1978)
- 김정수, "17세기 한국말의 높임법과 그 15세기로부터의 변천" (1984), 정음사
- 백두현, "현풍곽씨언간 주해" (2003), 태학사
- 서정목, "명령법 어미와 공손법의 등급 ―근대국어와 경상도 방언의 경우―", 관악어문연구, 8, pp.213~246 (1983)
- 서정목, "한국어 청자 대우 등급의 형태론적 해석(1)―‘옵니다체’의 해명을위하여―", 국어학, 17, pp.97~151 (1988)
- 안병희, "주체겸양법의 접미사 「--」에 대하여", 진단학보, 22, pp.103~126 (1961)
- 안병희, "한국문화사대계 Ⅴ 언어⋅문학사(상)", pp.165~261 (1965), 고려대학교 민족문화연구소
- 안병희, "개간 법화경언해에 대하여", 동방학지, 12, pp.235~246 (1971), 연세대학교 동방학연구소
- 유창돈, "이조 국어사 연구" (1980), 이우출판사
- 이기갑, "국어 방언 문법" (2003), 태학사
- 이기갑, "전남 방언 사전" (1998), 태학사
- 이기문, "개정 국어사 개설" (1972), 민중서관
- 이기문, "국어 음운사 연구" (1977), 탑출판사
- 이기문, "16세기 국어의 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
- 이상규, "경북 방언의 경어법", 새국어생활, 1(3), pp.59~82 (1991)
- 이태영, "역주 첩해신어" (1997), 태학사
- 이혁화, "경북 서부방언의 상대경어법", 정신문화연구, 30(4), pp.251~278 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원
- 이현희, "근대국어 경어법의 몇 문제", 한신어문연구, 1, pp.7~28 (1985), 한신대학 국어국문학과
- 조항범, "주해 순천김씨묘출토간찰" (1998), 태학사
- 한글학회, "큰 사전" (1947), 을유문화사
- 허웅, "중세 국어 연구" (1963), 정음사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 홍윤표, "17세기 국어 사전" (1995), 태학사
- 황문환, "16, 17세기 언간의 상대경어법" (2002), 태학사
- Bybee, J, "The Handbook of Historical Linguistics", pp.602~623 (2003), Blackwell
- Bye, P, "The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. Ⅲ: Phonological Processes", pp.1408~1433 (2011), Blackwell
- Hattori, S, "Remarks on the Sounds of Middle Korean of the Late Fifteenth Century", Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium, National Academy of Sciences, Republic of Korea, pp.81~90 (1979)
- Phillips, B. S, "Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change", Language, 60, pp.320~342 (1984)
- Weisler, S. E, "Theory of Language" (2000), MIT Press
