‘-아 잇-’의 융합과 ‘-습-’의 기능의미 바뀜
The Fusion of ‘-아 잇-’ and the Functional Change of ‘-습-’
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to show the diachronic change of ‘-습-’ in the ending ‘-습니다’. The diachronic change shows that, in the 15th, ‘-앗-’ resulted from the fusion of ‘-아 잇-’ changed functionally as a pre-ending, which caused the change of ‘-습-’. According to the process of the change, first, ‘-앗-’ became the pre-ending. This change influenced on the syntactic function of ‘-습-’. It means that the functional meaning of ‘-습-’ changed as an honorific ending to the listener. In the 17th century some of the fusion sequences was not orderly. It seems that the syntactic structure of ‘-시-’ had been recovered. And the fusion of ‘-아-+-잇-’ showed in the corpus of the 18th century seems to be occurred by the same cause. The new functional meaning of ‘-습-’ was overlapped with the function of ‘-이-’ and it lost ‘-이-’, which triggered the ending to have an honorific function for the listener. This change seems to influence on the fusion of ‘-습-’ with the ending. In the corpus of 18th century, the order of ‘-습-+-앗-’ appeared in the conjunct clause and an included sentence. It is resulted from the reason that the persistence and connected place of ‘-습-’ could not represent an honorific function to the listener.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to show the diachronic change of ‘-습-’ in the ending ‘-습니다’. The diachronic change shows that, in the 15th, ‘-앗-’ resulted from the fusion of ‘-아 잇-’ changed functionally as a pre-ending, which caused the change of ‘-습-’. According to the process of the change, first, ‘-앗-’ became the pre-ending. This change influenced on the syntactic function of ‘-습-’. It means that the functional meaning of ‘-습-’ changed as an honorific ending to the listener. In the 17th century some of the fusion sequences was not orderly. It seems that the syntactic structure of ‘-시-’ had been recovered. And the fusion of ‘-아-+-잇-’ showed in the corpus of the 18th century seems to be occurred by the same cause. The new functional meaning of ‘-습-’ was overlapped with the function of ‘-이-’ and it lost ‘-이-’, which triggered the ending to have an honorific function for the listener. This change seems to influence on the fusion of ‘-습-’ with the ending. In the corpus of 18th century, the order of ‘-습-+-앗-’ appeared in the conjunct clause and an included sentence. It is resulted from the reason that the persistence and connected place of ‘-습-’ could not represent an honorific function to the listener.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김동식, "객체높임법의 ‘삽’에 대한 검토", 관악어문연구, 9, pp.81~99 (1984)
- 김영욱, "문법형태의 역사적 연구" (1995), 박이정
- 김유범, "근대국어문법의 이해" (1998), 박이정
- 김정수, "17세기 한국말의 높임법과 그 15세기로부터의 변천", 박사, 언어학과, pp.1984
- 김형규, "국어 경어법 연구", 동양학, pp.29~42 (1975)
- 박부자, "한국어 선어말어미 통합순서의 역사적 변화에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 안병희, "중세국어의 겸양법 연구에 대한 반성", 국어학, 11, pp.1~23 (1982)
- 유동석, "국어의 매개변인 문법" (1995), 신구문화사
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이숭녕, "겸양법 연구", 아세아연구, 5, pp.134~184 (1962)
- 이숭녕, "경어법 연구", 진단학보, 25, pp.311~366 (1964)
- 이익섭, "국어경어법의 체계화 문제", 국어학, 2, pp.39~64 (1974)
- 이현희, "문법과 텍스트" (2002), 서울대학교 출판부
- 임홍빈, "국어문법의 심층" (1998), 태학사
- 전재관, "‘삽 따위’ 겸양사의 산고", 경북대학교 논문집, 2, pp.117~137 (1958)
- 주경미, "근대국어의 선어말어미에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.1990
- 최기호, "17세기 국어 {삽}의 통사기능", 말, 6, pp.133~167 (1981)
- 최동주, "국어 선어말어미 배열순서의 역사적 변화", 언어학, 17, pp.317~335 (1995)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1983), 정음문화사
- 황부영, "15세기 조선어 존칭범주의 연구" (1959), 과학원출판사
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사