존칭 주격조사 ‘-께서’의 형성: 의미적 혼태의 한 사례
The Formation of the Honorific Subject Marker -kkeyse in Korean: A Case of Semantic Contamination
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The honorific subject marker -kkeyse (-께서) in Present-day Korean has two antecedent forms: -kyesye (-겨셔) and -skuysye (-셔). The former began to appear in the second half of the 16th century and the latter did in the first half of the 17th century. Present day's -kkeyse has resulted from blending the two antecedent forms and some sound changes. Originally -skuysye was an honorific ablative marker. The topic of this paper is how it has developed into a subject marker. I believe that it is hardly or very rarely possible for an ablative marker to develop spontaneously into a subject marker. We should pay attention to the similar shapes of -kyesye and -skuysye, which were phonemically /kjəsjə/ and /k'ɨjsjə/, respectively. I argue that through semantic contamination -skuysye has gained its function as a subject marker from -kyesye, the preexisting honorific subject marker.
Abstract
The honorific subject marker -kkeyse (-께서) in Present-day Korean has two antecedent forms: -kyesye (-겨셔) and -skuysye (-셔). The former began to appear in the second half of the 16th century and the latter did in the first half of the 17th century. Present day's -kkeyse has resulted from blending the two antecedent forms and some sound changes. Originally -skuysye was an honorific ablative marker. The topic of this paper is how it has developed into a subject marker. I believe that it is hardly or very rarely possible for an ablative marker to develop spontaneously into a subject marker. We should pay attention to the similar shapes of -kyesye and -skuysye, which were phonemically /kjəsjə/ and /k'ɨjsjə/, respectively. I argue that through semantic contamination -skuysye has gained its function as a subject marker from -kyesye, the preexisting honorific subject marker.
참고문헌 (35)
- 고광모, "주체높임을 나타내는 어미 ‘-(으)ㅂ시-’의 발달 ― {-시-}의 형성과 ‘-(으)ㅂ시-’에 이른 변화 ―", 언어학, (76), pp.57~85 (2016), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사 2, "국립국어원", 국립국어원, ~ (2005)
- 김민국, "‘에서’ 주어의 통사와 의미", 國語學, (81), pp.145~190 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 김민국, "한국어 비주격 주어 표지의 문법화 - 존재 구문 및 탈격을 기원으로 하는 형식을 중심으로 -", 배달말, (65), pp.1~48 (2019), 배달말학회[DOI]
- 김정수, "17세기 한국말의 높임법과 그 15세기로부터의 변천" (1984), 정음사
- 김현주, "主語 標識 {-께서}의 形成에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(4), pp.133~159 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 박양규, "존칭 체언의 통사론적 특징", 진단학보, 40, pp.81~108 (1975)
- 박진호, "언어에서의 전염 현상", 언어, 40(4), pp.619~632 (2015), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 백두현, "현풍곽씨언간 주해" (2003), 태학사
- 엥흐볼드 엥흐투르, "한국어와 몽골어의 주격조사와 호격조사 비교 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2014
- 유창돈, "이조어 사전" (1964), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이광호, "처격어미 {에}, {에서}의 의미와 그 통합 양상", 어문학논총, 3, pp.87~105 (1984)
- 이익섭, "국어 문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이지영, "‘-로서’ 구문의 통시적 변화", 국어국문학, (165), pp.151~182 (2013), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 이태영, "근대국어 {-셔}, {-겨셔}의 변천과정 재론", 주시경학보, 8, pp.88~107 (1991)
- 이태영, "역주 첩해신어" (1997), 태학사
- 이현희, "‘멀리서’의 통시적 문법", 관악어문연구, 31, pp.25~93 (2006)
- 전형대, "역주 병자일기" (1991), 예전사
- 조항범, "주해 순천김씨묘출토간찰" (1998), 태학사
- 편무진, "『첩해신어』의 주격 표현에 대하여", 일본학보, 37, pp.421~434 (1996)
- 한국정신문화연구원, "한국 방언 자료집Ⅰ～Ⅸ" (1987), 한국정신문화연구원
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
- 홍윤표, "근대국어 연구(1)" (1994), 태학사
- 安田章, "개수첩해신어" (1991), 태학사
- 穆欣, "カラの主語性に関する研究―コーパス検索および文処理実験―", ことばの科学, 28, pp.71~90 (2014), 名古屋大学言語文化研究会
- 白井純, "助詞ヨリ", カラの主格標示用法について―キリシタン文献を中心として―, 2001, pp.52(3), 1~14[DOI]
- Algeo, J., "The Origins and Development of the English Language" (2013), Wadsworth
- Bybee, J., "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Hasegawa, Yoko, "Metaphors and Multiple Thematic Relations in Case Marking:An RRG analysis of Japanese ablative kara", Paper presented at the International Conference on Functional Approaches to Grammar, Summer LSA Institute (1995), University of New Mexico
- Heine, B., "World Lexicon of Grammaticalization" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Hock, H. H., "Principles of Historical Linguistics" (1986), Mouton de Gruyter
- Jenny, M., "Differential Subject Marking without Ergativity : The case of colloquial Burmese", Studies in Language, 37(4), pp.693~735 (2013)
- LaPolla, R., "‘Ergative’ Marking in Tibeto-Burman", Senri Ethnological Studies, 41, pp.189~228 (1995)
- Lehmann, Christian, "Thoughts on Grammaticalization, Second, revised edition", Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt (2002)
- Palancar, E. L., "The Origin of Agent Markers" (2002), Akademie Verlag