임자말로 기능하는 ‘-기’이름마디의 통시적 연구 - 16세기에서 18세기까지 -
A Diachronic Study on Subject function ‘-ki’ Nominal Clauses in Korean(From 16th Century to 18th Century)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find changing features of subject function ‘-기’nominal clauses from 16th century to 18th century's in Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows: In the 15th century, 「-ɨm」 functioned as an inflectional ending, and 「-ki」 functioned as a derivational suffix. In this century, 「-ki」 was rare. From the 16th century, 「-ki」 began to function as an inflectional ending, but it was rare. And the great part of the 「-ki」-nominal clauses functioned as the object. From the 17th century, 「-ki」 regularly began to function as an inflectional ending, but it was yet fewer than 「-ɨm」. In the 18th century, 「-ki」-nominal clauses that functioned as the subject were more found than the 17th century. As time goes by, the function of 「-ɨm」and 「-ki」 crossed each other. And we can see the 17th and 18th century was the crossing point.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find changing features of subject function ‘-기’nominal clauses from 16th century to 18th century's in Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows: In the 15th century, 「-ɨm」 functioned as an inflectional ending, and 「-ki」 functioned as a derivational suffix. In this century, 「-ki」 was rare. From the 16th century, 「-ki」 began to function as an inflectional ending, but it was rare. And the great part of the 「-ki」-nominal clauses functioned as the object. From the 17th century, 「-ki」 regularly began to function as an inflectional ending, but it was yet fewer than 「-ɨm」. In the 18th century, 「-ki」-nominal clauses that functioned as the subject were more found than the 17th century. As time goes by, the function of 「-ɨm」and 「-ki」 crossed each other. And we can see the 17th and 18th century was the crossing point.
참고문헌 (21)
- 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론" (1997), 집문당
- 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1985), 집문당
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
- 권재일, "한국어 문법사" (1998), 박이정
- 김석득, "우리말 형태론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색" (1988), 탑출판사
- 김용하, "한국어 격과 어순의 최소주의 문법" (1999), 한국문화사
- 김주원, "통사변화의 한 양상", 언어학, 7 (1984), 한국언어학회
- 김차균, "우리말 시제와 상의 연구", 태학사 (1990)
- 남기심, "국어 문법의 탐구 Ⅱ" (1996), 태학사
- 서정수, "한국어 문법 연구의 개관" (1991), 한국문화사
- 서태룡, "내포와 접속", 국어학, 8 (1979), 국어학회
- 안병희, "중세국어 문법론" (1992), 학연사
- 이현희, "국어 문법사 연구 30년(1959~1989)", 국어학, 19 (1989), 국어학회
- 이현희, "중세국어 명사문의 성격, 국어학의 새로운 인식과 전개 in: 김완진 선생 회갑기념논총" (1991), 민음사
- 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사 구조에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 24, pp.1~59 (1998), 서울대학교
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1978), 정음사
- 하치근, "우리 말본의 이해" (1999), 한국문화사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사