본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구 -17․18세기 중심으로-

A Syntactic Study of Adverbial Clausesin 17․18th Century Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in adverbial clauses in 17․18th century’s Korean. This study is based on the paper of adverbial clauses in 15․16th century’s Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows:The basic structure of the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause is ‘A가 B를 [adverbial clause] nəgida’. The object(B를) is transformed from subject in a adverbial clause. The predicate in the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause can be classified into ‘feeling adjective’ and ‘judgment adjective’. When the feeling adjective is the predicate in the adverbial clause, adverbial clause contains a predicative clause. In ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause in 17․18th century’s Korean, ‘-ke’ adverbial clauses are rarely found than ‘-i’ adverbial clauses. Four illustrative sentences are found in 17th century and twenty seven illustrative sentences are found in 18th century’s Korean. The predicates in the adverbial clause appeared from 18th centry, that is selected various words. Generally ‘-soi(소이)’ was discussed as a adverbial derivational suffix, but this paper consider it as adverbial endings. This is because it should suppose subject in a adverbial clause at deep structure, a syntactic function should be more valued than a form. In addition, It seems to make a quotative adverbial clause when it compared ‘-soi(소이)’ and ‘-i(이)’. The predicates in the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause appeared adjective in 15․16th century’s Korean, but appear rarely psychological verbs in 17․18th century’s Korean.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in adverbial clauses in 17․18th century’s Korean. This study is based on the paper of adverbial clauses in 15․16th century’s Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows:The basic structure of the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause is ‘A가 B를 [adverbial clause] nəgida’. The object(B를) is transformed from subject in a adverbial clause. The predicate in the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause can be classified into ‘feeling adjective’ and ‘judgment adjective’. When the feeling adjective is the predicate in the adverbial clause, adverbial clause contains a predicative clause. In ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause in 17․18th century’s Korean, ‘-ke’ adverbial clauses are rarely found than ‘-i’ adverbial clauses. Four illustrative sentences are found in 17th century and twenty seven illustrative sentences are found in 18th century’s Korean. The predicates in the adverbial clause appeared from 18th centry, that is selected various words. Generally ‘-soi(소이)’ was discussed as a adverbial derivational suffix, but this paper consider it as adverbial endings. This is because it should suppose subject in a adverbial clause at deep structure, a syntactic function should be more valued than a form. In addition, It seems to make a quotative adverbial clause when it compared ‘-soi(소이)’ and ‘-i(이)’. The predicates in the ‘nə-gi-da(너기다)’ adverbial clause appeared adjective in 15․16th century’s Korean, but appear rarely psychological verbs in 17․18th century’s Korean.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론" (1997), 집문당
  2. 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
  3. 김영희, "내포 접속문", 한글, 261, pp.173~206 (2003), 한글학회
  4. 김용경, "문법화의 단계성에 대한 고찰", 한글, 256, pp.45~68 (2002), 한글학회
  5. 박동근, "한국어 형태론 연구의 새로운 모색", 소통, 85~107 (2008)
  6. 박성훈, "노걸대언해 사전" (2009), 태학사
  7. 박주영, "‘것’의 문법화: 분포적 특성을 중심으로", 한말연구, 7, pp.201~220 (2000), 한말연구학회
  8. 윤혜영, "‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구 - 15ㆍ16세기 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (23), pp.235~266 (2008), 한말연구학회
  9. 이근영, "첩해몽어의 음운학적 연구", 한말연구, pp.145~163 (2003), 한말연구학회
  10. 이태영, "譯註 捷解新語" (1997), 태학사
  11. 전정례, "새로운 ‘-오-’ 연구" (1995), 한국문화사
  12. 조오현, "국어의 이유구문 연구" (1991), 한신문화사
  13. 조오현, "예술적 표현 형용사 연구-특히, ‘편하다류’ 형용사를 중심으로", 한글, 248, pp.5~48 (2000), 한글학회
  14. 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
  15. 허 웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
  16. 허 웅, "국어학" (1989), 샘문화사
  17. 허 웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
  18. 허 웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
  19. 어찌마디의 통어적 연구, "한글", 2002, 99~128, pp.한글학회
  20. 허원욱, "16세기 어찌마디의 통어론적 연구", 한말연구, pp.181~203 (2003), 한말연구학회
  21. 허원욱, "16세기 통어론" (2004), 신성출판사
  22. 허원욱, "15세기 통어론" (2005), 한국학술정보(주).
  23. 허원욱, "17세기 어찌마디의 통어적 연구", 한글, (270), pp.87~110 (2005), 한글학회
  24. 홍윤표, "17세기 국어사전" (1995), 한국정신문화연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)