본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선후기 부와 가사 문학 비교 - 李鈺의 <後蛙鳴賦>와 가사 <愚夫歌>를 중심으로 -

Study for comparison ‘Boo’ with ‘Gasa’ during the later of the Chosun -focusing attention on Lee Ok's ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-ga’

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study has the purpose to set connection of ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’, by comparison ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ with ‘WooBoo-Ga’ during the later of the Chosun. There is a difference that ‘Boo’ was written by Chinese letter and ‘Gasa’ was written by Korean letter. However those have something in common with that they are standing on intermediate position of poetry and prose. And also those have comparatively free form to be lengthened. These commons suggest possibility that ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ have effects on each other. Therefore, some close connection with ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ could be verified by comparison ‘HooWa Myung-Boo’ with ‘WooBoo-Ga’ of the same age. This study considered connection ‘Boo’ with ‘Gasa’ by comparison expression, function and form of ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo- Ga’. In the way of expression, ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ commonly have enumeration and antithesis. ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ has enumerations of historical events. Enumerations of ‘WooBoo-Ga’ were used to criticize immoral behaviors of three WooBooes. There is only one antithesis of ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’, this is considered that antithesis was not worthy to express the subject. In ‘WooBoo-Ga’ antithesis with enumeration were used several places to expose WooBoo's behaviors. ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ have same purpose which is instruction by admonition. This commonness is verified by characteristics of genre of ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’. Those have commonly intermediate character of poetry and prose, this character is suitable to enlighten people. At last, in the way of formal side, ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ have comparatively free form to be lengthened. By this characteristic those could express substantial contents and explanation about matters which cannot be handled by Chinese poetry and Shijo. Besides ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ was written in question and answer form and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ was in description. These styles - commonly found in ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ - were chosen by writers' intentions not by a characteristic of genre.

Abstract

This study has the purpose to set connection of ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’, by comparison ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ with ‘WooBoo-Ga’ during the later of the Chosun. There is a difference that ‘Boo’ was written by Chinese letter and ‘Gasa’ was written by Korean letter. However those have something in common with that they are standing on intermediate position of poetry and prose. And also those have comparatively free form to be lengthened. These commons suggest possibility that ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ have effects on each other. Therefore, some close connection with ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ could be verified by comparison ‘HooWa Myung-Boo’ with ‘WooBoo-Ga’ of the same age. This study considered connection ‘Boo’ with ‘Gasa’ by comparison expression, function and form of ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo- Ga’. In the way of expression, ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ commonly have enumeration and antithesis. ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ has enumerations of historical events. Enumerations of ‘WooBoo-Ga’ were used to criticize immoral behaviors of three WooBooes. There is only one antithesis of ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’, this is considered that antithesis was not worthy to express the subject. In ‘WooBoo-Ga’ antithesis with enumeration were used several places to expose WooBoo's behaviors. ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ have same purpose which is instruction by admonition. This commonness is verified by characteristics of genre of ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’. Those have commonly intermediate character of poetry and prose, this character is suitable to enlighten people. At last, in the way of formal side, ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ have comparatively free form to be lengthened. By this characteristic those could express substantial contents and explanation about matters which cannot be handled by Chinese poetry and Shijo. Besides ‘HooWaMyung-Boo’ was written in question and answer form and ‘WooBoo-Ga’ was in description. These styles - commonly found in ‘Boo’ and ‘Gasa’ - were chosen by writers' intentions not by a characteristic of genre.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "李鈺全集 권1", ~
  2. 김근, "한시의 비밀" (2008), 소나무
  3. 김문기, "서민가사연구" (1983), 형설출판사
  4. 김성수, "韓國 辭賦의 理解" (1996), 국학자료원
  5. 吳戰壘, "중국시학의 이해" (2003), 태학사
  6. 임기중, "역대가사문학전집 15" (1999), 아세아 문화사
  7. 조동일, "문학연구방법" (1980), 지식산업사
  8. 조동일, "한국문학통사 2" (1994), 지식산업사
  9. 강경호, "서민가사의 실체성 연구", 석사, pp.2002
  10. 강명관, "우부가연구 in: 한국가사문학연구" (1996), 태학사
  11. 고미숙, "고전시가 연구방법론의 비판적 검토", 민족문학사연구 (1991), 민족문학사 연구소
  12. 김광조, "우부가 화자의 대상인물에 대한 태도와 그 표현방식 in: 한국고전시가작품론2" (1992), 집문당
  13. 김대행, "윤리적 삶의 시대성 in: 시가시학연구" (1991), 이화여대 출판부
  14. 김미진, "가사에 나타난 미의식 연구", 석사, pp.1994
  15. 김병민, "서민가사에 나타난 리얼리즘양상", 석사, pp.1998
  16. 김상홍, "다산의 부문학 연구", 동양학, 15 (1985), 단국대학교 동양학연구소
  17. 김성수, "辭賦의 정의", 성신한문학, 3 (1991), 성신한문학회
  18. 김성수, "韓國賦의 형식", 한국고전연구, 4 (1993), 한국한문고전학회
  19. 김용철, "우부가 ; 부정적 경제 영웅의 성립과 비판", 민족문학사연구, 12 (1998), 민족문학사연구소
  20. 김지영, "조선후기 평민가사의 창작의식", 석사, pp.2007
  21. 김진경, "高麗時代 辭賦 硏究 - 作品槪觀과 存在樣相을 중심으로 -", 어문논집, (50), pp.65~108 (2004), 민족어문학회
  22. 김형태, "대화체 가사 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  23. 박성규, "用語의 槪念 in: 고전비평용어연구" (1998), 태학사
  24. 박세욱, "한중 賦의 형태학적 비교 연구-≪동문선≫에 실린 작품을 중심으로-", 중국어문학, 46(46), pp.323~352 (2005), 영남중국어문학회
  25. 송재소, "이조후기가사의 한 특징 in: 백영정병욱선생환갑기념논총" (1982), 신구문화사
  26. 양수찬, "조선후기 서민가사 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  27. 유기옥, "신광한의 사부문학", 한국언어문학, 45 (2000), 한국언어문학회
  28. 이동준, "愚夫歌의 작가층과 작가의식", 啓明語文學, 8 (1993), 계명대학교
  29. 임종옥, "韓國 賦 文學 硏究 試論 in: 한국한문학의 이론과 양상" (2001), 이회문화사
  30. 성원경, "松江문학에서의 동파영향고-관동별곡과 적벽부를 중심으로-", 새국어교육, 50 (1993), 한국국어교육학회
  31. 정기철, "조선후기 가사의 담론 기반과 특성 &#8722;서민가사와 규방가사를 중심으로&#8722;", 한국언어문학, 52(52), pp.269~292 (2004), 한국언어문학회
  32. 정재호, "우부가고 in: 한국가사문학론" (1982), 집문당
  33. 정훈, "이옥 부의 기법적 특성과 주제구현양상", 한국사상과 문화, (25), pp.65~86 (2004), 한국사상문화학회
  34. 조세형, "후기가사의 표현 특성과 그 문학사적 의미", 한국시가연구, (22), pp.241~268 (2007), 한국시가학회
  35. 한창훈, "고전문학 감상 교육에 있어서 역사적 상상력의 역할에 관한 試論- <愚夫歌><庸婦歌>의 풍자적 성격과 그 해석을 대상으로 -", 문학교육학, 9, pp.265~287 (2002), 한국문학교육학회
  36. 황재국, "관어대소부와 적벽부소고", 비교문학, 8 (1983), 한국비교문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)