18세기 어찌마디의 통어론적 연구
A Syntactic Study of Adverbial Clauses in 18th Century Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in adverbial clauses in 18th century’s Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows：Adverbial endings in 18th century are ‘-tʌs, -tʌrok, -ke’ and ‘-i’. Bound nouns that make adverbial clauses are ‘tʌs/tʌsi’, ‘tɜro’ and ‘yang’. ‘-i’ was described as a derivational suffix in 15th century, but from 16th century it should be described as an adverbial ending. This is because a syntactic function should be more valued than a form. In this paper, the syntactic rules are examined in three directions. First, which grammatical informations appear in the predicate of an adverbial clause? Second, is the subject in an adverbial clause the same as the subject in a holding clause? Last, what kind of relation exist between the predicate in an adverbial clause and the predicate in a holding clause?
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in adverbial clauses in 18th century’s Korean. This paper can be summarized as follows：Adverbial endings in 18th century are ‘-tʌs, -tʌrok, -ke’ and ‘-i’. Bound nouns that make adverbial clauses are ‘tʌs/tʌsi’, ‘tɜro’ and ‘yang’. ‘-i’ was described as a derivational suffix in 15th century, but from 16th century it should be described as an adverbial ending. This is because a syntactic function should be more valued than a form. In this paper, the syntactic rules are examined in three directions. First, which grammatical informations appear in the predicate of an adverbial clause? Second, is the subject in an adverbial clause the same as the subject in a holding clause? Last, what kind of relation exist between the predicate in an adverbial clause and the predicate in a holding clause?
참고문헌 (21)
- 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론", pp.362~365 (1987), 집문당
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론", pp.286~321 (1992), 민음사
- 김병건, "서술법 씨끝의 변화 유형 연구 －근대국어를 중심으로－", 한말연구, (28), pp.5~24 (2011), 한말연구학회
- 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색", pp.160~191 (1988), 탑출판사
- 김용경, "문법화의 단계성에 대한 고찰", 한글, 256, pp.45~68 (2002), 한글학회
- 박동근, "한국어의 통사적 접사 설정에 대한 비판적 검토", 한말연구, 7, pp.149~172 (2000), 한말연구학회
- 서정수, "한국어 문법 연구의 개관", pp.163~220 (1991), 한국문화사
- 윤혜영, "‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구 －17․18세기 중심으로－", 한말연구, (27), pp.157~194 (2010), 한말연구학회
- 이광호, "중세국어 부동사 어미 ‘-게’와 ‘-긔’의 의미 기능", 어문학논총, 10 (1991), 국민대어문학연구소
- 이상춘, "국어 문법" (1947), 조선국어학회
- 이현희, "국어 문법사 연구 30년(1959~1989)", 국어학, 19 (1989), 국어학회
- 장숙영, "<노걸대>언해류에 나타난 문장 구조 연구", 한말연구, (28), pp.253~280 (2011), 한말연구학회
- 전정례, "언어는 왜, 어떻게 변화하는가", 한말연구, (19), pp.347~369 (2006), 한말연구학회
- 車賢實, "中世國語의 凝縮補文 硏究", 박사, pp.1981
- 최대희, "17세기 이름마디 체계의 형성 과정", 한말연구, (26), pp.209~237 (2010), 한말연구학회
- 하치근, "우리 말본의 이해", pp.257~270 (1999), 한국문화사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본", pp.330~359 (1975), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본", pp.532~534 (1989), 샘문화사
- 허원욱, "15세기 국어의 어찌마디", 한글, 231, pp.119~148 (1996)
- 허원욱, "16세기 어찌마디의 통어론적 제약", 한말연구, 12, pp.181~203 (2002), 한말연구학회
- 허원욱, "17세기 어찌마디의 통어적 연구", 한글, (270), pp.87~110 (2005), 한글학회