미국 유권자들의 정치적 감정극화 양상과 효과 연구: 정치관여도, 사회참여도, 시민신뢰도, 인종 호감도를 중심으로

키워드

참고문헌 (58)

1. 가상준, "미국 의회의 양극화를 통해 본 미국정치의 변화", 한국정치학회보, 40(3), pp.211~236 (2006), 한국정치학회
2. 김하늬, "정치적 태도 극화 및 적대감 증가 요인과 그 결과에 대한 탐색 연구: 커뮤니케이션 변인, 정치참여, 사회자본을 중심으로", 정치커뮤니케이션연구, (43), pp.45~82 (2016), 한국정치커뮤니케이션학회[DOI]
3. 엄기홍, "정치엘리트 양극화, 유권자 양극화 그리고 정치참여: 미국 연방선거조사 자료의 경험적 분석", 한국과 국제정치, 23(1), pp.121~152 (2007), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
4. 오미영, "인터넷 여론과 소통의 집단 극화(極化)", 현상과 인식, 35(3), pp.39~60 (2011), 한국인문사회과학회
5. 유성진, "오바마 이후 미국의회, 양극화는 완화되었나?", 한국정당학회보, 11(3), pp.187~211 (2012), 한국정당학회
6. 이상신, "18대 대선과 태도극화: 정치적 소통은 분열을 심화시키는가?", 한국정당학회보, 12(1), pp.217~242 (2013), 한국정당학회
7. 이소영, "2016 미국 대선과 미국사회의 균열", 의정연구, 22(3), pp.39~82 (2016), 한국의회발전연구회
8. Abramowitz, A., "United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America", The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), pp.137~156 (2019)
9. Abramowitz, A. I., "Negative partisanship : Why americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans", Political Psychology, 39, pp.119~135 (2018)
10. Ajzen, I., "The theory of planned behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp.179~211 (1991)
11. Banda, K. K., "Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization", Electoral Studies, 56, pp.90~101 (2018)
12. Benoit, W. L., "The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication", pp.195~207 (2017)
13. Billig, M., "Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour", European journal of social Psychology, 3(1), pp.27~52 (1973)
14. Delacre, M., "Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test", International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1) (2017)
15. DiMaggio, P., "Have american's social attitudes become more polarized", American journal of Sociology, 102(3), pp.690~755 (1996)
16. America is exceptional in the nature of its political divide, "Dimock, M.", Pew Research Center, ~ (2020)
17. "The illusion of affective polarization" (2019)[URL]
18. Eveland Jr, W. P., "The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts", Communication Research, 28(5), pp.571~601 (2001)
19. Eveland Jr, W. P., "Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation", Political Communication, 17(3), pp.215~237 (2000)
20. Fiorina, M. P., "Polarization in the American public : Misconceptions and misreadings", The Journal of Politics, 70(2), pp.556~560 (2008)
21. Fiorina, M. P., "Political polarization in the American public", Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp.563~588 (2008)
22. "Congress and the Public" (2021)[URL]
23. Greene, S., "The structure of partisan attitudes : Reexamining partisan dimensionality and ambivalence", Political Psychology, 26(5), pp.809~822 (2005)
24. Hare, C., "The polarization of contemporary American politics", Polity, 46(3), pp.411~429 (2014)
25. Hawdon, J., "Social media use, political polarization, and social capital: Is social media tearing the US apart?", international conference on human-computer interaction, pp.243~260 (2020)
26. Helfstein, S., "Social capital and terrorism", Defence and Peace Economics, 25(4), pp.363~380 (2014)
27. Hetherington, M. J., "Consequences and correction of America’s polarized politics, 2", pp.1~33 (2008)
28. Hetherington, M. J., "Why Washington won't work" (2015), University of Chicago Press
29. Hogg, M. A., "Polarized norms and social frames of reference : A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(1), pp.77~100 (1990)
30. Huber, G. A., "Political homophily in social relationships : Evidence from online dating behavior", The Journal of Politics, 79(1), pp.269~283 (2017)
31. Iyengar, S., "The home as a political fortress : Family agreement in an era of polarization", The Journal of Politics, 80(4), pp.1326~1338 (2018)
32. Iyengar, S., "The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States", Annual Review of Political Science, 22, pp.129~146 (2019)
33. Iyengar, S., "Affect, not ideologya social identity perspective on polarization", Public opinion quarterly, 76(3), pp.405~431 (2012)
34. Iyengar, S., "Fear and loathing across party lines : New evidence on group polarization", American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), pp.690~707 (2015)
35. Jung, N., "The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation", Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), pp.407~430 (2011)
36. Kim, B., "Testing political knowledge as a mediator of the relationship between news use and affective polarization", The Social Science Journal, pp.1~13 (2020)
37. Kiousis, S., "Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength : Political figures during the 1996 presidential election", Communication Research, 31(1), pp.36~57 (2004)
38. Klofstad, C. A., "Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction", Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(2), pp.100~108 (2012)
39. Layman, G. C., "Party polarization in American politics : Characteristics, causes, and consequences", Annual Review of Political Science, 9, pp.83~110 (2006)
40. Lelkes, Y., "The hostile audience : The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect", American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), pp.5~20 (2017)
41. Levendusky, M. S., "Americans, not partisans: Can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization?", The Journal of Politics, 80(1), pp.59~70 (2018)
42. Marschall, M. J., "Race and the city : Neighborhood context and the development of generalized trust", Political behavior, 26(2), pp.125~153 (2004)
43. Mason, L., "The rise of uncivil agreement : Issue versus behavioral polarization in the American electorate", American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), pp.140~159 (2013)
44. Mutz, D. C., "The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation", American Journal of Political Science, pp.838~855 (2002)
45. "National Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted" (2020)[URL]
46. Petty, R. E., "Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences" (2014), Psychology Press
47. The partisan divide on political values grows even wider, "Pew Research Center", Pew Research Center, ~ (2017)
48. Price, V., "Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict", Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), pp.197~224 (1989)
49. Putnam, R. D., "Culture and politics", pp.223~234 (2000), Palgrave Macmillan
50. Robison, J., "Elite polarization and public opinion: How polarization is communicated and its effects", Political Communication, 33(2), pp.261~282 (2016)
51. Rogowski, J. C., "How ideology fuels affective polarization", Political Behavior, 38(2), pp.485~508 (2016)
52. "How couples meet and stay together, waves 1, 2, and 3. Machine Readable Data File" (2011)[URL]
53. Rudolph, T. J., "Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings", International Journal of Public Opinion Research (2021)
54. Soroka, S. N., "Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences" (2014), Cambridge University Press
55. Tajfel, H., "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict", Organizational identity: A reader, 56(65) (1979)
56. "Negative ads dominate in campaing’s final days" (2016)[URL]
57. "Mad Money: TV ads in the 2012 presidential campaign" (2012)[URL]
58. Webster, S. W., "The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the US electorate", American Politics Research, 45(4), pp.621~647 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천