근무성적평정 공정성인식 영향요인에 대한 탐색적 이론화 연구: 중앙부처산하 공공부문을 중심으로

키워드

참고문헌 (76)

1. 권향원, "근거이론적 방법의 이론화 논리에 대한 이해: 한국행정학의 비맥락성과 방법론적 편향성 문제를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 45(1), pp.275~302 (2011), 한국행정학회
2. 권향원, "근거이론의 수행방법에 대한 이해: 실천적 가이드라인과 이론적 쟁점을 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 20(2), pp.181~216 (2016), 한국정책과학학회
3. 권향원, "행정이론의 한국화를 위한 연구방법 및 이론화 전략: 보편성과 특수성의 이분법적 흑백논리의 극복", 한국행정학보, 51(2), pp.1~31 (2017), 한국행정학회[DOI]
4. 김정희, "미국과 일본의 근무성적평정제도 동향과 시사점", 비교교육연구, 14(1), pp.269~287 (2004), 한국비교교육학회
5. 김종수, "근무성적평정 결과의 공개가 조직구성원 성과에 미치는 영향", 한국인사행정학회보, 11(1), pp.63~85 (2012), 한국인사행정학회
6. 김종현, "근무성적평정과정에서 나타나는 초과근무의 후광효과에 관한 경험적 연구", 현대사회와 행정, 20(1), pp.73~93 (2010), 한국국정관리학회
7. 박시진, "근무성적평가자의 평가동기 모형 적용에 관한 예비조사: 한국 중앙 및 지방 공무원 평가자를 중심으로", 정부학연구, 20(1), pp.195~227 (2014), 정부학연구소
8. 박종민, "정책과 제도의 문화적 분석" (2002), 박영사
9. 박효민, "공정성 이론의 다차원성", 사회와 이론, (27), pp.219~260 (2015), 한국이론사회학회
10. 심재권, "근무평정의 공정성수용인식이 하위직공무원의 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향", 한국행정학보, 41(2), pp.141~166 (2007), 한국행정학회
11. 심재권, "공기업 근무성적평정의 타당성 분석", 한국행정학보, 37(2), pp.131~153 (2003), 한국행정학회
12. 유민봉, "공무원이 조직생활에서 경험하는 체면 현상과 행위에 대한 질적 연구: 근거이론(Grounded Theory)을 적용하여", 한국행정학보, 45(1), pp.199~225 (2011), 한국행정학회
13. 윤견수, "경험의 의미와 질적 연구의 연구 과정:근거이론에 대한 사례를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 17(2), pp.163~200 (2013), 한국정책과학학회
14. 이영철, "근거이론의 근거에 대한 음미: 방법론과 방법", 한국정책과학학회보, 18(1), pp.187~214 (2014), 한국정책과학학회
15. 이준호, "중국 국유기업의 조직공정성, 꽌시작용(guanxi practice)과 조직시민행동 간의 관계 : 성과평가수용성의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 47(3), pp.235~259 (2013), 한국행정학회
16. 허준영, "‘일과 삶 균형’ 저해요인에 관한 탐색적 이론화 연구: 세종시 중앙부처 공무원에 대한 근거이론의 적용", 행정논총, 54(2), pp.1~30 (2016), 한국행정연구소
17. Adams, J. S., "Towards an understanding of inequity", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), pp.422~ (1963)
18. Adams, J. S., "Advances in experimental social psychology", pp.267~299 (1965), Academic Press
19. Anderson, D., "Changing a culture of entitlement into a culture of merit", The CPA Journal, 72(11), pp.16~ (2002)
20. Bae, J., "Beyond Seniority-based Systems : A Paradigm Shift in Korean HRM?", Asia Pacific Business Review, 3(4), pp.82~110 (1997)
21. Billig, M., "Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour", European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), pp.27~52 (1973)
22. Bozionelos, N., "An Investigation on the Attitudes of Chinese Workers towards Individually Based Performance-related Reward Systems", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2), pp.284~302 (2007)
23. Castilla, E. J., "The paradox of meritocracy in organizations", Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), pp.543~676 (2010)
24. Charmaz, K., "Constructing Grounded Theory" (2006), Sage
25. Chen, C. C., "New trends in rewards allocation preferences : A Sino-US comparison", Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), pp.408~428 (1995)
26. Chen, Y. -L., "Determinants of biased subjective performance evaluations : evidence from a Taiwanese public sector organization", Accounting and Business Research, 44(6), pp.656~675 (2014)
27. Charmaz, K., "Constructing Grounded Theory" (2006), Sage
28. Cho, J. Y., "Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis : Similarities and differences", The Qualitative Report, 19(32), pp.1~20 (2014)
29. correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, "Applied multiple regression", pp.2013, Cohen, J.
30. Cresswell, J. W., "Mixed Methods" (2007), Sage Publications
31. Deutsch, M., "Distributive justice" (1985), Yale University Press
32. Edmondson, A. C., "Methodological Fit in Management Filed Research", Academy of Management Review, 32(4), pp.1155~1179 (2007)
33. Ferris, G. R., "The performance evaluation context : Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components", Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), pp.146~163 (2008)
34. Festinger, L., "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes", Human Relations, 7(2), pp.117~140 (1954)
35. Fiss, P. C., "Social Influence Effects and Managerial Compensation Evidence from Germany", Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), pp.1013~1031 (2006)
36. Frumkin, P., "Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), pp.283~307 (2004)
37. Gabris, G. T., "Improving Employee Acceptance Toward Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay Systems The Role of Leadership Credibility", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1), pp.41~53 (2000)
38. Giacobbe-Miller, J. K., "A comparison of Russian and U. S. pay allocation decisions, distributive justice judgments, and productivity under different payment conditions", Personnel Psychology, 51(1), pp.137~163 (1998)
39. Gioia, D. A., "Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation : Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia", Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), pp.370~403 (1996)
40. Glaser, B. G., "The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research" (1967), Aldine de Gruyter
41. Glaser, B. G., "Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory" (1978), Sociology Press
42. Glaser, B. G., "Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis" (1992), Sociology Press
43. Greenberg, J., "A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories", Academy of Management Review, 12(1), pp.9~22 (1987)
44. Harrington, J. R., "What Drives Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal? Exploring the Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on Employees’Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal in U. S. Federal Agencies", Public Personnel Management, 44(2), pp.214~238 (2015)
45. Hartmann, J., "Culture Change Refined and Revitalized : The Road Show and Guides for Pragmatic Action", Public Administration Review, 70(6), pp.845~856 (2010)
46. Hassan, S., "Does Fair Treatment in the Workplace Matter? An Assessment of Organizational Fairness and Employee Outcomes in Government", The American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), pp.539~557 (2012)
47. Hogan, T. D., "Executive Compensation : Performance Versus Personal Characteristics", Southern Economic Journal, 46(4), pp.1060~1068 (1980)
48. Homans, G. C., "Human behavior: Its elementary forms" (1961), Harcourt, Brace
49. Seok Eun Kim, "Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisals in the Federal Government", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(4), pp.329~348 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
50. Taehee Kim, "Public Employees and Performance Appraisal", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), pp.31~56 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
51. Kwon, H. W., "A Social Embeddedness Perspective on Turnover Intention : The Role of Informal Networks and Social Identity Evidence From South Korea. Public Personnel Management", Public Personnel Management (2017)
52. Leung, K., "The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), pp.793~ (1984)
53. Levy, P. E., "The social context of performance appraisal : A review and framework for the future", Journal of Management, 30(6), pp.881~905 (2004)
54. Liu, X., "Development of the Civil Servants’ Performance Appraisal System in China : Challenges and Improvements", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), pp.149~168 (2012)
55. Long, J. S., "Regression Model for Categorical Dependent Variables Using STATA" (2001), A STATA Press Publication
56. Martin, D. C., "Performance appraisal : Maintaining system effectiveness", Public Personnel Management, 27(2), pp.223~230 (1998)
57. Meyer, K., "Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence", Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2), pp.119~137 (2006)
58. Miles, M. B., "Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods" (1984), Sage Publications
59. Morris, M., "Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice", Applied Psychology, 49(1), pp.100~132 (2000)
60. Moynihan, D. P., "The Ties that Bind : Social Networks, Person-Organization Value Fit, and Turnover Intention", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), pp.205~227 (2008)
61. Nathan, B. R., "Interpersonal Relations as a Context For the Effects of Appraisal Interviews on Performance and Satisfaction : A Longitudinal Study", Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), pp.352~369 (1991)
62. Park, S., "Motivation of Public Managers as Raters in Performance Appraisal Developing a Model of Rater Motivation", Public Personnel Management, 43(4), pp.387~414 (2014)
63. Peters, B. G., "Policy transfers between governments : the case of administrative reforms", West European Politics, 20(4), pp.71~88 (1997)
64. Proudfoot, D., "The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace", pp.371~385 (2015)
65. Rainey, H. G., "Understanding and Managing Public Organizations" (2003), Jossey-Bass
66. Ridgeway, C. L., "The psychology of gender", pp.358~ (2004), Guilford Press
67. Roberson, L., "When group identities matter : Bias in performance appraisal", The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), pp.617~650 (2007)
68. Roberts, G. E., "Maximizing performance appraisal system acceptance : Perspectives from municipal government personnel administrators", Public Personnel Management, 23(4), pp.525~549 (1994)
69. Roberts, G. E., "Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation : A Technique That Works", Public Personnel Management, 32(1), pp.89~98 (2003)
70. Saldaña, J., "The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers" (2012), Sage Publications
71. Seidman, I., "Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences" (2006), Teachers College Press
72. Tsui, A. S., "Being Different : Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment", Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), pp.549~579 (1992)
73. Tyler, T. R., "The psychology of procedural justice : A test of the group-value model", Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), pp.830~ (1989)
74. Wayne, S. J., "The effects of impression management on the performance appraisal process", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(1), pp.70~88 (1991)[DOI]
75. Yamagishi, T., "In‐group Bias and Culture of Collectivism", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), pp.315~328 (1998)
76. Zhou, J., "Chinese and American Managers' Compensation Award Decisions : A Comparative Policy-Capturing Study", Personnel Psychology, 54(1), pp.115~145 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천