본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

여성의 인지적 가시화를 위한 대안적인 언어형식의 효과

Effects of Alternative Linguistic Forms on the Cognitive Visibility of Women

권영수
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2010.09|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제54호|pp. 1-20

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

총칭적인 남성형(generic masculine)대안적인 언어형식(alternative linguistic forms)양성명명(feminine- masculine pairs)대문자 I(capital I)여성의 인지적 가시화(cognitive visibility of women)
주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to examine what kind of mental representations are evoked by the ‘generic masculine' and ‘alternative linguistic forms'(feminine-masculine pairs and capital I) in the German language. Feminist linguistics have assumed that ‘generic masculine' nouns facilitate male images and therefore make women less visible. This issue has been addressed only in few studies in Germany. Four experiments are corroborated that were performed concerning the German language to determine the influence of language variations when using nouns on the cognitive representation of women. According to the experimental studies, in the generic masculine condition we perceived a lower cognitive visibility of women than in the alternative language conditions. On the basis of the results, the use of the alternative linguistic forms is recommended as more appropriate if both men and women are to be referred to.

Abstract

This study aims to examine what kind of mental representations are evoked by the ‘generic masculine' and ‘alternative linguistic forms'(feminine-masculine pairs and capital I) in the German language. Feminist linguistics have assumed that ‘generic masculine' nouns facilitate male images and therefore make women less visible. This issue has been addressed only in few studies in Germany. Four experiments are corroborated that were performed concerning the German language to determine the influence of language variations when using nouns on the cognitive representation of women. According to the experimental studies, in the generic masculine condition we perceived a lower cognitive visibility of women than in the alternative language conditions. On the basis of the results, the use of the alternative linguistic forms is recommended as more appropriate if both men and women are to be referred to.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Bem, S. L, "Does Sex-biased Job Advertising ‘Aid and Abet’ Sex Discrimination?", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, pp.6~18 (1973)
  2. Braun, F, "Was hat Sprache mit Geschlecht zu tun? Zum Stand linguistischer Frauenforschung. in: Frauenforschung in universitären Disziplinen - Man räume ihnen Kanzeln und Lehrstühle ein", pp.189~227 (1993), Leske & Budrich
  3. Braun, F, "Das große I und seine Schwestern - eine kritische Bewertung", Deutschunterricht, 1, pp.54~62 (1996)
  4. Braun, F, "Geschlecht im Türkischen. Untersuchungen zum sprachlichen Umgang mit einer sozialen Kategorie" (2000), Vieweg
  5. Braun, F., "Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen", Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 26, pp.265~283 (1998)
  6. Braun, F., "Das generische Maskulinum und die Alternativen", Germanistische Linguistik, 167, pp.77~87 (2002)
  7. Briere, J, "Sex-role Related Effects of Sex Bias in Language", Sex Roles, 9, pp.625~632 (1983)
  8. Flumm, E, "Gedanklichen Einbeziehung von Frauen im generischen Maskulinum vs. geschlechterspezifizierenden Sprachformen: Effekte der Sprachversion und der Einstellung zu einer geschlechtergerechten Sprache", 석사, pp.1997
  9. Gastil, J, "Generic Pronouns and Sexist Language: The Oxymoronic Character of Masculine Generics", Sex Roles, 23, pp.629~643 (1990)
  10. Grabrucker, M, "Vater Staat hat keine Muttersprache" (1993), Fischer
  11. Grimm, Jacob, "Deutsche Grammatik 3. Teil" (1890), Olms
  12. Hamilton, M. C., "Jury Instructions Worded in the Masculine Generic: Can a Woman Claim Self-defence When “He” is Threatened?. in: New Directions in Feminist Psychology. Practise, Theory, and Research(Springer Series: Focus on Women, Vol. 13)", pp.169~178 (1992), Springer Publishing Company
  13. Hellinger, M, "Kontrastive Feministische Linguistik" (1990), Max Hueber Verlag
  14. Hyde, J. S, "Children's Understanding of Sexist Language", Developmental Psychology, 20, pp.697~707 (1984)
  15. "Beeinflußt das grammatische Geschlecht die Repräsentation von Personen in einem mentalen Modell? Ein Vergleich zwischen einer englischsprachigen und einer deutschsprachigen Stichprobe, 42. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Reinbek: Rowohlt", ~ (2000)
  16. Irmen, L, "Zur Psychologie des 'generischen' Maskulinums", Sprache & Kognition, 15, pp.152~166 (1996)
  17. Käge, O, "Sprache und Geschlecht. Die sprachliche (Selbst)darstellung von Frau und Mann", Wirkendes Wort, Heft, 4, pp.258~269 (1983)
  18. Kalverkämper, H, "Die Frauen und die Sprache", Linguistische Berichte, 62, pp.55~71 (1979)
  19. Kindsvater, S, "Sexismus in der Sprache", 석사, pp.1996
  20. Kirdorf, B, "Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen und die gedankliche Einbeziehung von Frauen: Effekte der Sprachversion und der Geschlechtsrollenorientierung", pp.1997
  21. Klein, W, "Benachteiligung der Frau im generischen Maskulinum - eine feministische Schimäre oder Psycholinguistische Realität. in: Vorträge des Germanistentages Berlin 1987: Germanistik und Deutschunterricht im Zeitalter der Technologie. Selbstbestimmung und Anpassung Bd. 1", pp.310~319 (1988), Niemeyer
  22. MacKay, D. G, "On the Comprehension and Production of Pronouns", Journal of Verbal Leaning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp.661~673 (1979)
  23. Moulton, J., "Sex Bias in Language Use. 'Neutral' Pronouns that aren't", American Psychologist, 33, pp.1032~1036 (1978)
  24. Prentice, D. A, "Do Language Reforms Change Our Way of Thinking?", Journal of Language and Psychology, 13, pp.3~19 (1994)
  25. Pusch, L. F, "Der Mensch ist ein Gewohnheitstier, doch weiter kommt man ohne ihr. in: Das Deutsche als Männersprache", pp.20~42 (1984), Suhrkamp
  26. Rothermund, K, "Automatische geschlechtsspezifische Assoziationen beim Lesen von Texten mit geschlechtseindeutigen und generisch maskulinen Text-Subjekten", Sprache & Kognition, 17, pp.152~166 (1998)
  27. Scheele, B, "Wählen Wissenschaftler ihre Probleme anders aus als WissenschaftlerInnen? Das Genus-Sexus-Problem als paradigmatischer Fall der linguistischen Relativiätsthese", Sprache & Kognition, 12, pp.59~72 (1993)
  28. Stahlberg, D, "Effects of Sexist and Non-sexist Language in German. in: XIIth General Meeting, European Association of Experimental Social Psychology" (1999), Blackwell
  29. Stahlberg, D, "Generisches Maskulinum und alternative Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen", Psychologische Rundschau, 52, pp.131~140 (2001)
  30. Trömel-Plötz, S, "Frauensprache- Sprache der Veränderung" (1982), Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag
  31. Ulrich, M, "Neutrale Männer-markierte Frauen. Feminismus und Sprachwissenschaft", Sprachwissenschaft, 13, pp.383~399 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

총칭적 남성형의 성별에 대한 정신적인 표상권영수한국영어영문학회 · 영어영문학2014 · 제19권 제4호독일어의 총칭적 남성형과 성 중립성 확보를 위한 제안 고찰김정민한국독일어문학회 · 독일어문학2009 · 제17권 제1호성차별 언어 접촉 경험의 성별 효과 : 감정, 인지 그리고 행동이수연, 이혜림한국여성정책연구원 · 여성연구2019 · 제103권 제4호대명사의 성별단서에 담긴 사회인지적 표상이재호한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2015 · 제34권 제1호총칭적 남성형과 교육적 함의권영수언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2013 · 제67호독일어의 총칭적 남성형김정민한국독어학회 · 독어학2008 · 제18호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

개념적 은유를 촉발하는 언어 표현김태현pp. 21-40새로운 중국어능력평가방식 新HSK 분석연구 - 新HSK 5급과 舊HSK 초·중급의 비교를 중심으로 -성윤숙pp. 41-82감정표현소 웃음의 경계설정 및 생리적 환유와 담화기능: 러시아어 담화텍스트를 중심으로엄순천pp. 83-104<훈민정음 언해본>의 번역학적 연구여찬영pp. 105-122중학교 영어 교과서와 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 기능별 비교분석이수지, 김은정pp. 123-142
원문 보기