存在的焦虑：高行健的《一个人的圣经》与米兰ㆍ昆德拉的《不能承受的生命之轻》互文对话
The Presence of Anxiety: The Intertextual Dialogue of Gao Xingjian’s One Man’s Bible and Milan Kundera’s The Unbearable Lightness of Being
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the meaning of life and existence by analyzing the dialogue in Gao Xingjian’s One Man’s Bible and Milan Kundera’s The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Roland Barthes deems that every text holds intertextualness in various forms with different presentations. Eliot comments that the literature writers should observe literature in historical contexts of which in order to get more inspirations. Gao and Kundera convey existentialism in a multidimensional space. However, the themes expressed in Kundera’s The Unbearable Lightness of Being are less transparent and meaningful than Gao’s One Man’s Bible. The Unbearable Lightness of Being encompasses the life of a few individual characters and introduces philosophical thoughts through their choices of life. For example, the reminiscence of the past, custom rituals, oblivion and the co-incidenceness of time are analyzed. However, Gao’s One Man’s Bible depicts the turmoil in Cultural Revolution, which has been experienced by different parties, but not a single individual. Although both Gao and Kundera have inherited the core philosophies of Sartre’s existentialism, Gao opposes to the social functions of literature. For Kundera, he tends to achieve self-actualization through the literature and investigate the meaning of life.
Abstract
This paper explores the meaning of life and existence by analyzing the dialogue in Gao Xingjian’s One Man’s Bible and Milan Kundera’s The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Roland Barthes deems that every text holds intertextualness in various forms with different presentations. Eliot comments that the literature writers should observe literature in historical contexts of which in order to get more inspirations. Gao and Kundera convey existentialism in a multidimensional space. However, the themes expressed in Kundera’s The Unbearable Lightness of Being are less transparent and meaningful than Gao’s One Man’s Bible. The Unbearable Lightness of Being encompasses the life of a few individual characters and introduces philosophical thoughts through their choices of life. For example, the reminiscence of the past, custom rituals, oblivion and the co-incidenceness of time are analyzed. However, Gao’s One Man’s Bible depicts the turmoil in Cultural Revolution, which has been experienced by different parties, but not a single individual. Although both Gao and Kundera have inherited the core philosophies of Sartre’s existentialism, Gao opposes to the social functions of literature. For Kundera, he tends to achieve self-actualization through the literature and investigate the meaning of life.
참고문헌 (19)
- 高行健, "一个人的圣经" (2011), 联经
- 高行健, "没有主义" (2001), 联经
- 米兰, "不能承受的生命之轻" (2010), 上海译文出版社
- 米兰, "小说的艺术" (2012), 上海译文出版社
- 罗兰ㆍ巴特, "<作者之死>，《文之悦》，东文选，（韩文版）"
- 程光炜著, "中国当代诗歌史" (2003), 中国人民大学出版社
- 高行健专访, "台湾联合报二零零年十二月十日，第三版", ~ (2000)
- 刘再复, "多元社会中的‘群’‘己’权利界限", 2011年首尔国际文学论坛-全球化中的生活与写作》论文集, 5, pp.24~26 (2011), 大山文化财团
- 李永求, "高行健的<一个人的圣经>小考", 中国研究, 40
- 艾略特, "传统与个人才能 in 艾略特文学论文集" (1994), 百花洲文艺出版社
- 밀란, "참을 수 없는 존재의 가벼움" (2012), 민음사
- 방미경, "삶은 다른 곳에" (2011), 민음사
- 가오싱젠, "나혼자만의 성경1, 2" (2002), 현대문학북스
- 사르트르, "존재와 무" (2010), 동서문화사
- "한중언어문화연구 30집", 한국현대중국연구회, ~ (2012)
- 김영명, "≪靈山≫에 나타난 始原 文化 硏究", 석사, 중어중문학과, pp.2012
- 김성곤, "문학에 이르는 길 (공저)" (1989), 열음사
- 金英明, "《灵山》与《楚辞》比较研究", 世界比较文化研究, 36 (2011)
- 金英明, "高行健与李仁星小说比较研究", 中国文学研究, 47 (2012)