汉语“NP1+VP1+得+NP2+VP2”致使句对应的韩语形式 - 基于语料库的研究
A corpus-based study on the correspondence in Korean lanuage for Chinese imperative sentence structure "NP1+VP1+得+NP2+VP2"
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper makes a study on the usage of “得” in modern Chinese based onthe theory of corpus linguistics and actual language practice. The selected samplesare language resources from Chinese modern fictions, including 许三观卖血记 、兄弟 、 在细雨中呼喊 、 红高粱家族 、 生死疲劳 . All these novels have beenpublished in Korea under the names of 허삼관매혈기 . 형제 , 가랑비속의 외침 ,홍까오량가족 and 인생은고달파 , By comparing the Korean translation of “得”with its original using situation, we conclude its usage in modern Chinese. We compare the corresponding sentences when Korean and Chinese “得” beingused in the selected samples and categorize the results into four classes, i.e., assertion,ordinary statement, syntax and phrases. The frequencies of these four classes are47.84%, 44.80%, 7.14% and 0.22%。Studies show that sentences with “得”corresponds to Korean assertion and ordinary statement in practice. Next, the modern usage of “得” is investigated with individual correspondence. It has almost the same occurrence frequency with phrases “-게하다” and “-게만들다”. Apparently it indicates that “sentence structures are mainly determined by keywords”seems to be more common in the amount of all languages, but one can make sure thatthese sentences may show slightly difference structures. The sentence structure inChinese “NP1+VP2+得+NP2+VP2” corresponds to the form “NP1+NP2+(VP1)+VP2”in Korean language. “VP1” is omitted if one can confirm and determine the differencebetween the control of verbs. In the author’s corpus, “得” corresponds to a verb when being used. It seems that “쫓아내다” is just a significantly low-frequency correspondence that is discovered. It is expected that this study can provide some help to Chinese educationalistsengaged in education by analyzing and comparing the samples in practical corpus. However, “得” still needs more analysis and pragmatics on Korean sentences inmany environment to seek a meaningful correspondencein the modern Koreanlanguage. Detailed analysis will be made in the following research projects.
Abstract
This paper makes a study on the usage of “得” in modern Chinese based onthe theory of corpus linguistics and actual language practice. The selected samplesare language resources from Chinese modern fictions, including 许三观卖血记 、兄弟 、 在细雨中呼喊 、 红高粱家族 、 生死疲劳 . All these novels have beenpublished in Korea under the names of 허삼관매혈기 . 형제 , 가랑비속의 외침 ,홍까오량가족 and 인생은고달파 , By comparing the Korean translation of “得”with its original using situation, we conclude its usage in modern Chinese. We compare the corresponding sentences when Korean and Chinese “得” beingused in the selected samples and categorize the results into four classes, i.e., assertion,ordinary statement, syntax and phrases. The frequencies of these four classes are47.84%, 44.80%, 7.14% and 0.22%。Studies show that sentences with “得”corresponds to Korean assertion and ordinary statement in practice. Next, the modern usage of “得” is investigated with individual correspondence. It has almost the same occurrence frequency with phrases “-게하다” and “-게만들다”. Apparently it indicates that “sentence structures are mainly determined by keywords”seems to be more common in the amount of all languages, but one can make sure thatthese sentences may show slightly difference structures. The sentence structure inChinese “NP1+VP2+得+NP2+VP2” corresponds to the form “NP1+NP2+(VP1)+VP2”in Korean language. “VP1” is omitted if one can confirm and determine the differencebetween the control of verbs. In the author’s corpus, “得” corresponds to a verb when being used. It seems that “쫓아내다” is just a significantly low-frequency correspondence that is discovered. It is expected that this study can provide some help to Chinese educationalistsengaged in education by analyzing and comparing the samples in practical corpus. However, “得” still needs more analysis and pragmatics on Korean sentences inmany environment to seek a meaningful correspondencein the modern Koreanlanguage. Detailed analysis will be made in the following research projects.
참고문헌 (43)
- 陈昌来, "论现代汉语的致使结构", 井冈山师范学院学报, (3) (2001)
- 程丽丽, "“N1+P1得+N2+P2”句式中P2的语义指向" (2000), 首都师大出版社
- 程琪龙, "Jackendoff “致使概念结构”评介", 国外语言学, (3) (1997)
- 丁恒顺, "“N1+V得+N2+VP”句式", 中国语文, (3) (1989)
- 范 晓, "得句的“得”后成分", 汉语学习, (6) (1992)
- 范晓, "论致使结构" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 范晓, "“V得”后主谓结构的语义分析", 中国学研究, (4) (2001)
- 郭姝慧, "现代汉语致使句式研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 郭锐, "致使表达的类型学和汉语的致使表达", 第一届肯特岗国际汉语语言学圆桌会议论文(新加坡) (2001)
- 金海月, "从朝鲜语反观汉语的“V得“致使结构", 汉语学习, (2) (2008)
- 金海月, "中韩使动句范畴对比研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 李梅, "“N1+V得+N2+VP”句式考察", 烟台师范大学学报 (1999)
- 牛顺心, "汉语中致使范畴的结构类型研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 张璐, "现代汉语“得”字补语句研究", 博士, pp.2003
- 周红, "现代汉语致使范畴研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 周红, "现代汉语致使范畴研究" (2005), 复旦大学出版社
- 周红, "客体致使句的认知语义分析", 语言研究, (3) (2006)
- 周红, "汉语致使范畴建构研究", 渤海大学学报, (1) (2006)
- 周红, "次第致使和组元致使的认知语义差别与功能特征", 云南师范大学学报, (2) (2007)
- 周红, "致使表达的现实性语虚拟性及其功能特征", 广播电视大学学报, (1) (2007)
- 고영근, "표준국어문법론" (2005), 탑출판사
- 김덕규, "현대 한어 사동문의 직접사동과 간접사동", 외국문화연구, (1) (1992), 조선대
- 金英熙, "國語의 被動과 使動", 석사, pp.1989
- 김영희, "‘-게 하-’사동 구문의 세 유형", 어문학, 54 (1993)
- 김성주, "사동의 의미에 대한 小考", 목멱어문, 2 (1987)
- 金成周, "현대국어 장형사동 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1989
- 김성주, "국어 사동문 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
- 김성주, "‘-시키-’ 동사의 유형과 국어의 사동문", 국어국문학, 132, pp.5~22 (2003), 국어국문학회
- 김성주, "한국어의 사동" (2003), 한국문화사
- 김정대, "“-게하다”가동구문의기저구조", 인문과학논총, 2 (1989)
- 김형배, "국어의 사동사 연구" (1997), 도서출판 박이정
- 박미정, "현대중국어의 사동표현 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2002
- 朴連玉, "중·한 사동문 대조 연구", 박사, 국제한국언어문화학과 한국어교육전공, pp.2012
- 박은석, "중한 실의사동동사문 연구", 중국문화연구, (18), pp.29~58 (2011), 중국문화연구학회[DOI]
- 박은석, "한중 분석형 사동 구조 연구를 통해 본 한중 문법 대조 연구", 한국언어문화교육학회 학술대회 (2012)
- 배혜연, "단형 사동과 장형 사동의 의미 해석에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 서정수, "“게”와 “도록”에 관하여", 인문과학논총, 14 (1988)
- 이상억, "국어의 사동․피동구문연구", 국어연구, 26 (1970)
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 柳性基, "國語 使動詞에 관한 通時的 연구", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1993
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1980), 탑 출판사
- "표준국어대사전"